SJW's have ruined Movies/TVseries

[bodecea]

Who is beheading anyone in the USA? Who is killing babies and people who disagree? It is obvious that you need help.

Have you not seen the recent Guillotine political emblems of northern Dem candidates? Liberals now asking "Do we really need Billionaires?" etc.

You guys are actually about to go down the militaristic Jacobian/Bolshevik route.

How scary.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Why do you need to behead Christians Jews, The Rich and Conservatives?

It's obvious that you people don't care for fair elections, Due Process or Civil Rights. Why is that? Why do you think you have to kill babies and people who disagree with you? Don't you have some inspiring Bullshit to sell people on your Communist Utopia?

Why won't America trust you to take their guns, limit their free speech, force them in to Government Run Healthcare?

All Socialist States end up in Mass Murder when The Socialists cannot promise what they lied to The People about, and they want them out of office.

Why you want to Behead Us, Bro?

Who is beheading anyone in the USA? Who is killing babies and people who disagree? It is obvious that you need help.

Your Head is Up Your Ass, so technically You are Beheaded. You Leftist Commies killed 60 Million Babies so far.

Why should we trust you with more power when you HATE US?

For communist scum like Lysistrata

 

[Harpy Eagle]

But the topic of this thread is entertainment

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

They are not sacrificing half their profits, you triggered snowflakes do not make up half the population, you are a tiny percent of it

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

 

[Correll]

But the topic of this thread is entertainment

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

They are not sacrificing half their profits, you triggered snowflakes do not make up half the population, you are a tiny percent of it

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Yes, the way you are using it, is a lie. YOur position is a lie.


Why are you defending the lib assholes that abuse their position to put propaganda into entertainment?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

What are you doing? YOu just made a false point, and when called on it, you make another false point, without any addressing of what you making the previous false point.

I did not make a false point, I used your own measures of "good" against you and you ran from it like a mouse from a cat

Why are you defending liberal Hollywood people that abuse their position to slip political propaganda into entertainment?

Two reasons...

1. It is their ******* money, their ******* companies and their choices. I will always defend the rights of private companies to do what they want to do.

2. I will never defend snowflakes like you, if you do not like it, turn it the **** off. But no, you keep watching and then whine about it as if you were somehow forced to watch.

 

[Montrovant]

But the topic of this thread is entertainment

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

They are not sacrificing half their profits, you triggered snowflakes do not make up half the population, you are a tiny percent of it

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Yes, the way you are using it, is a lie. YOur position is a lie.


Why are you defending the lib assholes that abuse their position to put propaganda into entertainment?

How is it abusing their position?

In fact, wait, just who is it you think is abusing their position, and then how are they doing so? What are the rules of video entertainment you think the abusers must follow?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

1. It is their ******* money, their ******* companies and their choices. I will always defend the rights of private companies to do what they want to do.

2. I will never defend snowflakes like you, if you do not like it, turn it the **** off. But no, you keep watching and then whine about it as if you were somehow forced to watch.

Bear in mind (I know this quote is from between you and another poster) that I have never demanded anything of these film producers.

I do however find their self impoverishing choices to be very strange. I cannot find any rational or logical reason for why they would purposely devalue most of their own products ... unless another entity is paying for the devaluation.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

In fact, wait, just who is it you think is abusing their position, and then how are they doing so? What are the rules of video entertainment you think the abusers must follow?

They are abusing the trust of their investors and failing to uphold the well established standards of Fiduciary Responsibility.

They take the money of these investors and then devalue the investment by inserting a slew of SJW shit for personal reasons.

The investors do however make a net gain, but they could be gaining A LOT more, so much more in fact that if any savvy investor ever hired a lawyer and research firm to investigate the loss of potential profit, they would find grounds for a lawsuit against these producers under Fiduciary law.

 

[anynameyouwish]

I was clear that the show was excellent. Why are you lying about what I said?

so excellent it did not even have the ratings for a 3rd season.

What are you doing? YOu just made a false point, and when called on it, you make another false point, without any addressing of what you making the previous false point.


Why are you defending liberal Hollywood people that abuse their position to slip political propaganda into entertainment?

"Why are you defending liberal Hollywood people that abuse their position to slip political propaganda into entertainment?"


rush limbaugh has a constitutional right to slip propaganda into his program 3 hours a day and into every page of his books

fox news, ann coulter, michelle malkin, bill oreilly, sean hannity all have a constitutional right to slip conservative propaganda into their programs

conservative movie makes have a right to slip conservative propaganda into their films.....

only a fascist nazi piece of crap would want to deny liberals the same constitutional right.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Bear in mind (I know this quote is from between you and another poster) that I have never demanded anything of these film producers.

I do however find their self impoverishing choices to be very strange. I cannot find any rational or logical reason for why they would purposely devalue most of their own products ... unless another entity is paying for the devaluation.

They are not self impoverishing choices, you give yourself and your fellow snowflakes far too much credit, there just really is not that many of you on either side.

 

[Correll]

What are you doing? YOu just made a false point, and when called on it, you make another false point, without any addressing of what you making the previous false point.

I did not make a false point, I used your own measures of "good" against you and you ran from it like a mouse from a cat

Why are you defending liberal Hollywood people that abuse their position to slip political propaganda into entertainment?

Two reasons...

1. It is their ******* money, their ******* companies and their choices. I will always defend the rights of private companies to do what they want to do.

2. I will never defend snowflakes like you, if you do not like it, turn it the **** off. But no, you keep watching and then whine about it as if you were somehow forced to watch.

1. Got it. Silly word games. Are you done with that now?

2. But it is not their money. THey have investors that they are supposed to be maximizing profits for. INstead they are abusing their positions to be assholes. So, why are you really defending them?

3. Nothing "snowflake" about feeling insulted by an insult. You keep using these words, to try to "trigger" me, but instead, I am just pointing out that you are using them incorrectly. How many times will you try that and fail, before you stop doing that?

 

[Correll]

Bear in mind (I know this quote is from between you and another poster) that I have never demanded anything of these film producers.

I do however find their self impoverishing choices to be very strange. I cannot find any rational or logical reason for why they would purposely devalue most of their own products ... unless another entity is paying for the devaluation.

They are not self impoverishing choices, you give yourself and your fellow snowflakes far too much credit, there just really is not that many of you on either side.

Why do you think that Black Panther made so much money?

 

[Correll]

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

They are not sacrificing half their profits, you triggered snowflakes do not make up half the population, you are a tiny percent of it

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Yes, the way you are using it, is a lie. YOur position is a lie.


Why are you defending the lib assholes that abuse their position to put propaganda into entertainment?

How is it abusing their position?

In fact, wait, just who is it you think is abusing their position, and then how are they doing so? What are the rules of video entertainment you think the abusers must follow?

Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

rush limbaugh has a constitutional right to slip propaganda into his program 3 hours a day and into every page of his books

fox news, ann coulter, michelle malkin, bill oreilly, sean hannity all have a constitutional right to slip conservative propaganda into their programs

conservative movie makes have a right to slip conservative propaganda into their films.....

only a fascist nazi piece of crap would want to deny liberals the same constitutional right.

It's well known that when you turn on Fox news, CNN, MSNBC or Rush that the program is going to be political. It is also going to repulse a large portion of the US population.

These programs have political target audiences, and aim to derive and maximize their profits from the audience of whom they target.


At no point in this thread did I say film producers "dont have the right to insert their viewpoints."

But as supposedly non-political commercial entities, it makes no sense for them to forcefully insert so many far left SJW themes into their productions, driving away half the US population (if not more than half). And thus it must be assumed that another entity is underwriting these potential profit losses.

How Underwriters Assess the Risk of Insurers

 

[anynameyouwish]

They are not sacrificing half their profits, you triggered snowflakes do not make up half the population, you are a tiny percent of it

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Yes, the way you are using it, is a lie. YOur position is a lie.


Why are you defending the lib assholes that abuse their position to put propaganda into entertainment?

How is it abusing their position?

In fact, wait, just who is it you think is abusing their position, and then how are they doing so? What are the rules of video entertainment you think the abusers must follow?

Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors.

"Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors."

not if the investors are ok with the content.

you seem to want to tell EVERYONE what YOU WANT THEM TO DO and to DEMAND that they NOT offend ....YOU!

sorry, snowflake, but other people get to decide for themselves.

you really should shut the fuk up and stop censoring people

you cons really hate freedom of speech

 

[Correll]

I was clear that the show was excellent. Why are you lying about what I said?

so excellent it did not even have the ratings for a 3rd season.

What are you doing? YOu just made a false point, and when called on it, you make another false point, without any addressing of what you making the previous false point.


Why are you defending liberal Hollywood people that abuse their position to slip political propaganda into entertainment?

"Why are you defending liberal Hollywood people that abuse their position to slip political propaganda into entertainment?"


rush limbaugh has a constitutional right to slip propaganda into his program 3 hours a day and into every page of his books

fox news, ann coulter, michelle malkin, bill oreilly, sean hannity all have a constitutional right to slip conservative propaganda into their programs

conservative movie makes have a right to slip conservative propaganda into their films.....

only a fascist nazi piece of crap would want to deny liberals the same constitutional right.

Rush Limbaugh, built his show on his political views. He was maximizing his investors profits as he did that.


He was not hired to do a romantic comedy and sneakily slipped right wing propaganda into the show.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Bear in mind (I know this quote is from between you and another poster) that I have never demanded anything of these film producers.

I do however find their self impoverishing choices to be very strange. I cannot find any rational or logical reason for why they would purposely devalue most of their own products ... unless another entity is paying for the devaluation.

They are not self impoverishing choices, you give yourself and your fellow snowflakes far too much credit, there just really is not that many of you on either side.

They are.

They've taken some really good films and scenes and ruined them with immersion breaking SJW shit. Star Wars I Phantom Menace would have been awesome without Jar Jar Binks (immersion breaking); just as Star Wars Last Jedi would have been awesome without all the SJW bullshit.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

"Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors."

not if the investors are ok with the content.

you seem to want to tell EVERYONE what YOU WANT THEM TO DO and to DEMAND that they NOT offend ....YOU!

sorry, snowflake, but other people get to decide for themselves.

you really should shut the fuk up and stop censoring people

you cons really hate freedom of speech

If I went to a northern university and raised funds to make a film about "World War II and Rise of the Nazi Germany," and that film instead turned out to be SUPPORT and ENDORSEMENT of Nazis, praising Hitler and showing an "alternate world where Hitler won,"

I would be arrested and convicted of FRAUD.

That is exactly what these SJW criminals do to their investors. They take their money, and instead of returning the maximum possible profit, they short it by 40-60% by REPULSING most/all conservatives.

This video should help you:

 

[Dragonlady]

I think that it is hilarious to hear from all of these people who think that our entire society and entire industries must do their bidding and meet with their approval. They must be catered to. It doesn't work that way. Nobody is forcing them to watch anything, yet they complain that they are being "forced" to watch. This reminds me of that asshole who wants to sue the NFL because of the Superbowl half-time show. He apparently thinks that the NFL needs to run whatever it does by him first and abide by His Royal Highness's opinions. Go figure.

I ask again....why is it that all these so-called right wing alpha males are such crybabies?

It’s a victim mentality. There is no difference between the OP and the rhetoric you still hear from time to time from ethnic minorities who complain about the lack of representation on the screen.

The thing is that non of the "whiners" are alpha males and that includes Trump. Trump is bully and bullies are never alphas, they wanna be alphas but they lack the ability. A true alpha doesn't need to threaten and intimmidate people into doing his bidding. Trump has whined endless that his family has never received the respect of the business and social elites. That's because respect is earned, and he's never earned any.

Business leaders won't work with this White House - the President's Council on business was resolved when all the top leaders quit in protest after Charlottesville.

Most of the world's leaders are alpha's. That's why they laughed at Trump's ridiculous claim at the UN that he was the best President ever. The Australian President mocked him. The world leaders at the G7 were laughing about his speech.

To real alphas, like Rex Tillerson, or Nancy Pelosi, Trump is a "******* moron". And Trump knows it's true, and that's why he whines endlessly about how "unfairly" he's treated.

Nancy Pelosi is Evil and Sold her soul to The Devil a Long Time Ago, and Tillerson was Dishonorable and Disloyal and went behind The President's back and undermined The President's Foreign Policy.

I could care less about people The President has fired.

Of course you don’t. Because all you care about is Donald Trump initiating the Apocalypse and destroying the world so you can go to heaven.

Nothing else matters to you

 

[Correll]

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Yes, the way you are using it, is a lie. YOur position is a lie.


Why are you defending the lib assholes that abuse their position to put propaganda into entertainment?

How is it abusing their position?

In fact, wait, just who is it you think is abusing their position, and then how are they doing so? What are the rules of video entertainment you think the abusers must follow?

Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors.

"Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors."

not if the investors are ok with the content.

you seem to want to tell EVERYONE what YOU WANT THEM TO DO and to DEMAND that they NOT offend ....YOU!

sorry, snowflake, but other people get to decide for themselves.

you really should shut the fuk up and stop censoring people

you cons really hate freedom of speech

The investor may or may not be an expert in the field. Whether he closely monitors the content or not, whether he understand the marketing implications of putting politics into the product or not,


the directors, producers and writers still have their responsibility to produce the best content they can, and not instead undermine that by including political propaganda that they know will undermine their product.


Pointing to a lack of resistance from the investors, does not justify the actions of the libs in question.