Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

[jc456]

It doesn't warm JACK SHIT.

Sincerely,

highly correlated satellite and balloon data

Well convection ends it

 

[EMH]

Well convection ends it

Why did the highly correlated satellite and balloon data show no warming in the atmosphere for decades during rising Co2?

 

[jc456]

Why did the highly correlated satellite and balloon data show no warming in the atmosphere for decades during rising Co2?

Convection

 

[EMH]

the movement caused within a fluid by the tendency of hotter and therefore less dense material to rise, and colder, denser material to sink under the influence of gravity, which consequently results in transfer of heat.


That's day to day shit, not 3+ decades, nice try genius....

 

[irosie91]

Why did the highly correlated satellite and balloon data show no warming in the atmosphere for decades during rising Co2?

read up on KREBS

 

[EMH]

read up on KREBS

Which star system??

 

[irosie91]

Which star system??

the energy of life----the KREBS CYCLE

 

[EMH]

the energy of life----the KREBS CYCLE

and precisely what does that have to do with highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing NO WARMING in the atmosphere for 3+ decades of rising Co2??

 

[irosie91]

and precisely what does that have to do with highly correlated satellite and balloon data showing NO WARMING in the atmosphere for 3+ decades of rising Co2??

I am responding to your idiot statement "CO2 does nothing"

 

[EMH]

I am responding to your idiot statement "CO2 does nothing"

LOL!!!

Your side has a THEORY, that increasing atmospheric Co2 warms the atmosphere. We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temperature readings, satellites and balloons. For more than three decades (and for the balloons much longer) the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere during a period of rising Co2. Then both data series were FUDGED with laughable BS that doesn't stand up to any scrutiny in 2005...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"


Now, in the practice of actual science, when you have a theory and the ACTUAL DATA refutes the theory you

REJECT THE THEORY

 

[irosie91]

LOL!!!

Your side has a THEORY, that increasing atmospheric Co2 warms the atmosphere. We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temperature readings, satellites and balloons. For more than three decades (and for the balloons much longer) the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere during a period of rising Co2. Then both data series were FUDGED with laughable BS that doesn't stand up to any scrutiny in 2005...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"


Now, in the practice of actual science, when you have a theory and the ACTUAL DATA refutes the theory you

REJECT THE THEORY

ATMOSPHERIC WARMING? what happened to "global warming"?

 

[EMH]

ATMOSPHERIC WARMING? what happened to "global warming"?

LOL!!!

Actually, Co2 is in the atmosphere. If the atmosphere isn't warming, then increasing Co2 does nothing...

 

[irosie91]

LOL!!!

Actually, Co2 is in the atmosphere. If the atmosphere isn't warming, then increasing Co2 does nothing...

what does that ^^^^ mean. There is no question in my mind that variation in
levels of CO2 have profound effects ON THE GLOBAL SYSTEM. CO2 is a huge issue
in all living systems-----we is-----as noted on some Star Trek episode long ago
"SIX CARBON UNITS" Even the fishes of the sea are "SIX CARBON UNITS"----
all the way down to the amebas

 

[EMH]

what does that ^^^^ mean. There is no question in my mind that variation in
levels of CO2 have profound effects ON THE GLOBAL SYSTEM. CO2 is a huge issue
in all living systems-----we is-----as noted on some Star Trek episode long ago
"SIX CARBON UNITS" Even the fishes of the sea are "SIX CARBON UNITS"----
all the way down to the amebas

Co2 is necessary for life as we know it.

OK.

But when Co2 is increased in the atmosphere, does it cause warming?

According to the two and only two measures we have of atmospheric temps, the answer is NO...

But if you watch Star Trek, there is still hope for you....

 

[Dagosa]

The first part is understanding what is climate and what is weather. Climate is the parameters of Earth that allow certain ranges of weather. We don't get Cat 10 canes now, but we would if Earth had no ice.

What are the parameters of climate that can change?

Ocean levels
Atmospheric thickness
Temperature
Humidity


What controls those?

The amount of ice on the planet. Period. Ocean level is 100% inversely correlated to Earth ice content (on land, not sea ice, which is pathetically small) - duh. Trapped in ice age glacier is compressed gas. When it snows 10 feet, you can compress that into a few inches of ice, and the rest is air, which also gets compressed, when it is under 100k years of ice layers on top of it. When that ice melts, that compressed air is released back into the atmosphere, making it denser. Clearly more ice makes things colder, but it is the discrepancy between the polar circles today that is key to understanding Earth climate change and how it occurs.

90% of Earth Ice is on Antarctica
7% is on Greenland

97% of Earth ice is on the two land masses closest to the poles.... and land moves.

Air that passes over the Antarctic Circle cools 50F (58F from the above image) more than air that passes over Arctic.

Antarctica also puts 9 times the ice into the oceans, some 46 times the H2O the Mississippi River puts in the Gulf, and that ice is colder than Arctic ice.


The Antarctic Circle cools Earth much more than the Arctic Circle does.


All about land near the poles. And land moves.

Hi dufus. The Antartica has snow ice dufus. That’s why there is mire if it. It snows there and accumulates.

 

[EMH]

Hi dufus. The Antartica has snow ice dufus. That’s why there is mire if it. It snows there and accumulates.

Why is there more "snow ice" in the Antarctic vs the Arctic?

 

[ding]

How the ocean distributes heat to the polar regions. That's what causes the climate to change.

 

[EMH]

How the ocean distributes heat to the polar regions. That's what causes the climate to change.

Bullshit. Ocean currents do not change Earth heat content, any more than wind does.

 

[ding]

Bullshit. Ocean currents do not change Earth heat content, any more than wind does.

They distribute heat and that's what makes climate. Maybe try using google.

 

[EMH]

They distribute heat and that's what makes climate. Maybe try using google.

distributing heat on a sphere doesn't change the heat content of the sphere, MORON.

If you switched the Arctic Circle and the Antarctic Circle, America would be colder, but Earth would NOT be colder, because the southern hemisphere would be warmer.

You really are an embarrassment to the practice of actual science.