Should We Get Some Boots On The Ground?

[Natural Citizen]

I just think any poster should think twice about taking a strong and vocal stance on a topic when they haven't even looked into it beyond what the controlled MSM tells them... AND, when they aren't even familiar with the people involved. (For example, on another thread in a conversation about the Epstein operation, someone here didn't know who Dan Bongino was, and barely knew who Kash Patel was.) But anyway, that's all I'm gonna say on that.

Yeah, it was the same tard you're wasting your time and keystrokes on here in this thread who also had to look up who Netanyahu was.

And you're arguing with her over complex middle eastern affairs?

Getting those types to think critically even once is a chore in itself, much less getting them to think twice. lolol...

 

[ChristisKing]

That guy is a lunatic leftist and Biden lover.

 

[buttercup]

Okay I didn't realize that the last video was the president of Israel, but considering the fact that I don't know anything about him, I don't really trust what he's saying.

Thanks for acknowledging that. As I said earlier to eagle, it's possible that their current position on ground troops could change. But I was just going by the latest, I haven't heard anything recent that contradicts that.

 

[ChristisKing]

Thanks for acknowledging that. As I said earlier to eagle, it's possible that their current position on ground troops could change. But I was just going by the latest, I haven't heard anything recent that contradicts that.

Look up. I found out that he's a Biden lover and a lunatic leftist. He said that Biden strengthened Israel and he did no such thing.

 

[ChristisKing]

If he means what he says then he's an asshole.

 

[buttercup]

Yeah, it was the same tard you're wasting your time and keystrokes on here in this thread who also had to look up who Netanyahu was.

And you're arguing with her over middle eastern affairs.

Getting those types to think critically even once is a chore in itself, much less getting them to think twice. lolol...

I'm done arguing on this thread. But as I'm sure you agree...when posting to anyone, sometimes you're mainly posting for anyone reading who IS interested in getting to the truth, or anyone who isn't completely closed-minded and unreasonable.

 

[ChristisKing]

Btw I might not know everything (nobody does except God) but at least I don't believe that we're working with Russia and Iran in the car manufacturing industry.

 

[Natural Citizen]

I'm done arguing on this thread. But as I'm sure you agree...when posting to anyone, sometimes you're mainly posting for anyone reading who IS interested in getting to the truth, or anyone who isn't completely closed-minded and unreasonable.

Yeah, I get all of that.

I just think that it's far wiser and a more practical use of one's time and keystrokes to do so with people who are at least knowledgeable and capable of carrying on intelligent, relevant dialigue, without the clown show, regardless of whether they agree or disagree with you.

That's the kind of dialogue that serious people would benefit most from as observers and casual passers-by.

They do not and will not benefit from having to reduce yourself and your talking points to accomodate the shallow level of the uninformed with a juvenile, clown-like mindset. May as well be playing whak-a-mole. And, really, doing so renders you ''occupied'' and less likely to ever progress relevant dialogue to any deeper degree.

Anyway. Have a great rest of the afternoon...

 

[toomuchtime_]

I'm getting the feeling that a couple of you didn't even see the link I posted, much less click on it.

Israel Rules Out Ground Troops in Any U.S. Operation in Iran, Media Repo - JFeed

Israel sets a "firm red line" regarding a potential U.S. ground invasion of Iran. Reports confirm the IDF will provide air and intel su - JFeed Israel News

www.jfeed.com

I was going by the LATEST position, as stated in the article, that Israeli troops would not be sent to Iran. Are you denying what was stated in that article?

So again, IF (according to the latest position) Israeli ground troops will not be sent to Iran, but Netanyahu made it clear that the uranium needs to be taken out, who do you think he wants to go into Iran? Where is the lie in the post you quoted? (#34) Be specific.

The article is two months old and there is no source named for this information. Furthermore, Bullshitter, it does not refer to the mission to retrieve the 60% enriched uranium, just to some undefined ground operation.

Disabuse yourself of the notion you are being clever, Bullshitter.

 

[buttercup]

The article is two months old and there is no source named for this information. Furthermore, Bullshitter, it does not refer to the mission to retrieve the 60% enriched uranium, just to some undefined ground operation.

Disabuse yourself of the notion you are being clever, Bullshitter.

You might want to read recent posts on a thread before saying something that was already addressed. If that source wasn't good enough for you, see post #94. Are all those false too? Furthermore, if you had actually read the string of conversation that led to that, we were talking about Israel sending ground troops. That was the point that CiK questioned dblack on, which l replied to. Don't bother replying, evidently all you have is angry nasty name-calling, without even keeping up with a thread.

 

[Cougarbear]

If negotiations haven't been made in say... About thirty days? Give or take that is but I would say that that would be a fair amount of time. I say yes because since Iran has been pumping out oil into the gulf, if being shot to death doesn't kill the Iranian people, pollution will at some point.

We should do it now. Trump is back in America. Let Israel do what they said they can do and carry out physically the rest of the plutonium. At the same time, go in and remove all the weapons they have and remove the rest of the leaders.

 

[toomuchtime_]

You might want to read recent posts on a thread before saying something that was already addressed. If that source wasn't good enough for you, see post #94. Are all those false too? Furthermore, if you had actually read the string of conversation that led to that, we were talking about Israel sending ground troops. That was the point that CiK questioned dblack on, which l replied to. Don't bother replying, evidently all you have is angry nasty name-calling, without even keeping up with a thread.

Bullshitter, there is nothing in the article about retrieving the 60% enriched uranium and no definition of what kind of ground operation. Putting the two together is purely the invention of your sick mind.

 

[Moonglow]

If negotiations haven't been made in say... About thirty days? Give or take that is but I would say that that would be a fair amount of time. I say yes because since Iran has been pumping out oil into the gulf, if being shot to death doesn't kill the Iranian people, pollution will at some point.

Dunboat diplomacy and Skullduggery are not pretty.

 

[buttercup]

Bullshitter, there is nothing in the article about retrieving the 60% enriched uranium and no definition of what kind of ground operation. Putting the two together is purely the invention of your sick mind.

What is wrong with you? Did you not read my post? I didn't say anything about "60% uranium" AGAIN, we weren't talking about uranium, we were talking about the question of Israel sending GROUND TROOPS in general. You pretend that there's just one article, even after I linked you to MULTIPLE articles and videos from various sources saying the same thing. And videos of the president of Israel saying there are no plans to send ground troops.

So at this point I have to conclude you either didn't read my reply at all, or you're just flat out dishonest. Not to mention extremely nasty and belligerent.

 

[toomuchtime_]

What is wrong with you? Did you not read my post? You pretend that there's just one article, even after I linked you to MULTIPLE articles and videos from various sources saying the same thing. And videos of the president of Israel saying there are no plans to send ground troops. AGAIN, we weren't talking about the uranium only, we were talking about the question of Israel sending GROUND TROOPS in general.

So at this point I have to conclude you either didn't read my reply at all, or you're just flat out dishonest. Not to mention extremely nasty and belligerent.

Bullshitter, you explicitly linked the Israeli position not to send troops for a conventional ground operation to the mission of retrieving the enriched uranium. Citing other people who are just as sick as you are doesn't make you less sick.

 

[dblack]

What is wrong with you? Did you not read my post? I didn't say anything about "60% uranium" AGAIN, we weren't talking about uranium, we were talking about the question of Israel sending GROUND TROOPS in general. You pretend that there's just one article, even after I linked you to MULTIPLE articles and videos from various sources saying the same thing. And videos of the president of Israel saying there are no plans to send ground troops.

So at this point I have to conclude you either didn't read my reply at all, or you're just flat out dishonest. Not to mention extremely nasty and belligerent.

You're being trolled. Just step around it.

 

[buttercup]

You're being trolled. Just step around it.

Yeah, I was just thinking that. I gave him the benefit of the doubt, thinking maybe he replied without reading my post. But I think you're right, no sincere person who posts in good faith acts like that. Ugh...ugly. He's going on my unofficial ignore list. Which is quite an achievement, as there are only 2 or 3 people on this entire site who made it there.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Yeah, I was just thinking that. I gave him the benefit of the doubt, thinking maybe he replied without reading my post. But I think you're right, no sincere person who posts in good faith acts like that. Ugh...ugly. He's going on my unofficial ignore list. Which is quite an achievement, as there are only 2 or 3 people on this entire site who made it there.

I am going to take that as a compliment, Bullshitter, to the effectiveness of my posts in countering your lies.

 

[dblack]

Yeah, I was just thinking that. I gave him the benefit of the doubt, thinking maybe he replied without reading my post. But I think you're right, no sincere person who posts in good faith acts like that. Ugh...ugly. He's going on my unofficial ignore list. Which is quite an achievement, as there are only 2 or 3 people on this entire site who made it there.

I used to like the idea of not having an ignore list. I like to listen to all views. But many people here consistently shit post. So I have a couple dozen of these nitwits on mine. If I get bored, sometimes I'll click on "show ignorant content". But that makes it a conscious choice. I don't read their bullshit as a matter of course.

 

[ChristisKing]

I am going to take that as a compliment, Bullshitter, to the effectiveness of my posts in countering your lies.

Yep she's full of it alright, but I'm just curious why you answered my poll question as no. What was your reasoning?