Should The US Nuke Iran?

Should The US Nuke Iran?


  • Total voters
    34
What Trump is doing makes little sense to me. What exactly is he expecting from the Iranians? A promise that they will abandon their pursuit of nuclear capability? They have made similar commitments several times in the past, and repeated U.S. military pressure has not produced a lasting solution.


My concern is that, once the political pressure from Republicans in Congress becomes strong enough, Trump will ultimately accept yet another agreement in which Iran promises to scale back its nuclear ambitions and present itself as cooperative. He will then declare victory, claim he has saved America from a nuclear threat, hold a large public celebration, and perhaps even try to turn it into a national holiday.
Agreed. His shrinking MAGAt base believes he's playing 5D Chess, but the reality appears to be he is mostly hot air. Due to his age, probably dementia along with fear of death. Trump is a mammon-worshiper and he's starting to realize he can't take his mammon with him.
 
I'm a woman. You were right. You know what that means don't you?
That you're a hypocrite but a little butch too?

I strongly doubt Christ gives a shit if you are butch or not just like I strongly doubt Christ would approve of mass murder by nuking Iran.

Trump is not a Christian. He's not the anti-Christ either, just an evil, greedy old man who would happily nuke Iran.

Why do you admire him so much, Christi?

ahp4ym.jpg
 
They're dumping oil into the ocean, brah. That can go on until the pumps are destroyed.


Well I suppose some of it could be leakage possibly but I know that they have to be pumping it into it as well.
 
How does Iran deliver such a nuclear device?
Aside from dirty bombs, I don’t know, that isn’t the point, however
Ummm....creating an atomic bomb is one thing but delivering it is another. It adds to the threat.

Delivery can be by ship, cargo aircraft or rowboat. It doesn't have to be an ICBM.
 
He is waging economic War hoping the people will Revolt.

Given they are out of storage for oil they may soon be screwed Royally with their wells.
If that's his reasoning, we are in deep shit. The population is 92 million. The largest protests were only a very small fraction of the population. Also, most of those protestors were not seeking an overthrow of the goverment but more freedom in their daily lives. The Supreme Leader is the highest-ranking political and religious authority in Iran, serving as head of state and commander-in-chief. The biggest problem is that there has been no political figure that has the support of people nor is able to unite the varied political interests.
Do to years of religious indoctrination, the military is fiercely loyal to the leader. They may not be able to stand up against the US military but they will certainly be able to put down any uprising.

Baring nuclear weapons, there is only only one way to subue Iran, a full scale military invasion with boots on the ground.
 
Last edited:
I know that Trump currently is trying a blockade hoping that Iran will negotiate, but now apparently Iran has started pumping their oil into the water which will cause a mass pollution for the environment and wild life and innocent people. So Trump has already set out a warning that if the Iranians don't sign an agreement soon Iran will glow.


Here's the question though, are nukes the ONLY way to solve the problem and end this war because it seems like there's just going to be a whole lot more problems if Trump gave the order than if he still was trying to negotiate with them even though they clearly have no interest in it. I just worry about the innocent Iranian people though.





(That's no leak btw, you can count on that.)



How do you think the rest of the world will respond if that happens.
 
How do you think the rest of the world will respond if that happens.


Right now this is between Iran, Israel, and the US.


The fact remains Trump is the least empathetic President in my lifetime. Even Nixon had more empathy for others. Nixon never threatened to nuke a city, but Trump has advocated doing so.



Yeah but Trump is the first president with enough guts to go after Iran.
 
They have nothing that will reach the USA. No Trucks of theirs will reach the USA. None of their boats comes to the USA.
They can certainly hit our allies. Explain how a boat from Iran cant sail across the ocean. Shit up, retard.
 
15th post
I know that Trump currently is trying a blockade hoping that Iran will negotiate, but now apparently Iran has started pumping their oil into the water which will cause a mass pollution for the environment and wild life and innocent people. So Trump has already set out a warning that if the Iranians don't sign an agreement soon Iran will glow.


Here's the question though, are nukes the ONLY way to solve the problem and end this war because it seems like there's just going to be a whole lot more problems if Trump gave the order than if he still was trying to negotiate with them even though they clearly have no interest in it. I just worry about the innocent Iranian people though.





(That's no leak btw, you can count on that.)



They should run low impact nuetron bombs all the way up and down the 3oo mile cost that harbors the speed boats
 
Trump? Yes if he's actually, I mean Iran isn't exactly cooperating with us, but I'm still personal on the fence about it because I know how dangerous nuclear weapons are.
if they spread several hundred small warheads ...nuetron bombs...not N bombs....up and down the 3oo mile coast where the speed boast live in culvits and caves the would have to abandon the area....
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom