Should Twitter ban Kamala like it did Trump?


"...In another briefing on South Asia, Trump’s advisors brought a map of the region from Afghanistan to Bangladesh, according to intelligence officers with knowledge of the meeting and congressional officials who were briefed on it. Trump, they said, pointed at the map and said he knew that Nepal was part of India, only to be told that it is an independent nation. When said he was familiar with Bhutan and knew it, too, was part of India, his briefers told him that Bhutan was an independent kingdom."

Think that's all? Nope.

It turns out, as Politico has reported, that this briefing took place before Trump's meeting in 2017 with Prime Minister Narendra Modi -- and the US president "mispronounced Nepal as 'nipple' and laughingly referred to Bhutan as 'button'," while he looked at a map of South Asia.
 
Deciding what to allow someone to communicate and what not to is not allowing them to communicate idiot.

Hey fuckstick, here's the meat off the bone.

" we have determined that these Tweets are in violation of the Glorification of Violence Policy and the user @realDonaldTrump should be immediately permanently suspended from the service."

Of course if twitter was one of only three national broadcasting networks maybe the old Fairness Doctrine could have applied, but lets not pretend that there's not many different channels of communication available to the former Grumpyone in Chief to get his violence encouraging messages across to his thugs.
 
Post violence porn, get banned from Twitter. Awwwwww. :crybaby:

Just like this forum.
 
Hey fuckstick, here's the meat off the bone.

" we have determined that these Tweets are in violation of the Glorification of Violence Policy and the user @realDonaldTrump should be immediately permanently suspended from the service."

Of course if twitter was one of only three national broadcasting networks maybe the old Fairness Doctrine could have applied, but lets not pretend that there's not many different channels of communication available to the former Grumpyone in Chief to get his violence encouraging messages across to his thugs.
The Democratic party just pays people for violence, maybe Trump should try that too.
 
What else do you do when a person in a position of great responsibility displays such ignorance?

She wasn't deserving of the role and it was one she had to accept so it's hard to pity her.
 
She wasn't deserving of the role and it was one she had to accept so it's hard to pity her.
True that it's hard to pity someone whose greed and hubris made them accept a role that was far too big for them. I'll have to reconsider how I feel about Quid Pro. And she didn't have to accept it, she could have easily let Quid Pro know she was off the market when he reached out to her.
 
Twitter banned Trump for inciting an insurrection in the last days of his sore loserness.

They do not ban people for making gaffes like Kamala did, or else Trump would have been banned in the first week of his presidency.
 

Twitter banned Trump to prevent him from communicating to the world

But perhaps they should do the same for Kamala, but for a different reason, it's because she is a total idiot.


Vice President Kamala Harris was caught in a precarious blunder again when she implied in a tweet that Ukraine was a part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin has cited the possibility of Ukraine joining NATO as part of his justification for invading the former Soviet republic as a matter of national defense.

"When I was in Poland, I met with U.S. and Polish service members, thanking them for standing with our NATO allies for freedom, peace, and security," read the tweet from the @KamalaHarris account. "The United States stands firmly with the Ukrainian people in defense of the NATO alliance."

Harris' false claim that Ukraine had already joined NATO was an embarrassing and potentially harmful blunder.
Twitter/facebook banned Trump because they felt he was inciting more violence and supporting the violence and attack that happened....

I didn't take Kamala's statement posted as saying the Ukraine was a PART of NATO. I read it as saying that supporting Ukraine was supporting NATO, because the Russian war and aggression in the Ukraine was a threat to the NATO countries bordering Ukraine.
 

Forum List

Back
Top