Should The Donald Demand More Debates?

[Snouter]

He breezes through them will ease and by increasing the number it prevents the MSM from coordinating their response with centralized orchestration like with the first debate, and will also make managing Crooked Hillary's severe medical issues easier to expose, like her coughing episode yesterday which was previously cured with 3 days of antibiotics.

Oct 4 is the VP debate. My guess is the MSM have already planned and rehearsed their response as to why Pence didn't really win. They will possibly use a fat, qu33r immigrant as their poster child who is so happy being married to another qu33r. The poster child qu33rs now have a house, picket fence, a dog and are working on their first offspring with the help of local scientists and look forward to free college.

Oct 9 is the second President debate. And it "will take the form of a town meeting, in which half of the questions will be posed directly by citizen participants and the other half will be posed by the moderator based on topics of broad public interest as reflected in social media and other sources. " It is strange the establishment uses the sexist word "broad" so much but probably the hottest topic in social media is Crooked Hillary's apparent Parkinson's disease. I wonder if that topic will be brought up since unlike other diseases, it invariably result in severe dementia.

 

[Norman]

A debate, so that Hillary Clinton could call him misogynist, racist, xenophobe and homophobe in person again?

Personally I avoid the sort of people whose only "argument" is that.

 

[Onyx]

Considering he tanked from the last one, I'd advise him to stay quiet.

He always does better when he keeps his mouth shut and lets his campaign staff speaks on his behalf.

 

[Snouter]

Norman, it is true all Crooked Hillary can do is fling bogus personal insults. And the Clintons are famous more being clever in the mud with the help of the MSM. But there are a couple of simple things The Donald can do to neutralize Crooked Hillary's lies and deception and force her to address the facts.

 

[Toro]

Considering that he has been falling further behind since the last debate, yes.

 

[midcan5]

Sniffles can't debate, he proved that already. He can only name call. The right wing conservatives and republicans cannot take responsibility for their candidates. It is always the media's fault, or the moderator, or the mic. What a sad, weak bunch of people. Face it folks your candidate is a fool and all the sane republican newspapers and commentators admit that today. It is only the immature and naive partisans online that fail to acknowledge reality. Cry on children your savior is a fool and proves it daily.

 

[Mac1958]

It was clear long before the first debate that Trump didn't have the temperament, political skills or knowledge of the issues to do a traditional debate.

None of those deficiencies mattered when he was winning the GOP nomination, but they do now.

He has displayed two gears: (1) The buffoonish, brutish, loud-mouthed salesman and (2) the tamed, frustrated teleprompter-reader. Neither of those require the precise intellectual dexterity that a candidate must possess when going up against an experienced politician in a nationally-televised debate.

That said, no doubt he'd love more debates, because BELIEVE ME!


.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Norman, it is true all Crooked Hillary can do is fling bogus personal insults. And the Clintons are famous more being clever in the mud with the help of the MSM. But there are a couple of simple things The Donald can do to neutralize Crooked Hillary's lies and deception and force her to address the facts.

If he's going to do any debates, he needs to put the time and energy in order to win the debates. He can't wing it like he originally thought. That was fine in the primaries when he had time to stand there and think of replies while the other 15 candidates spoke. You simply can't do that one on one. You have to plan and be ready with a response in a matter of seconds. You have to practice and practice so when a good opening does come up, you can capitalize on it.

 

[Norman]

Sniffles can't debate, he proved that already. He can only name call. The right wing conservatives and republicans cannot take responsibility for their candidates. It is always the media's fault, or the moderator, or the mic. What a sad, weak bunch of people. Face it folks your candidate is a fool and all the sane republican newspapers and commentators admit that today. It is only the immature and naive partisans online that fail to acknowledge reality. Cry on children your savior is a fool and proves it daily.

Racist... sexist... homophobe... racist... xenophobe... ageist... misogynist... racist... homophobe... The library of Clinton arguments.


Do you see the irony?

 

[Norman]

It was clear long before the first debate that Trump didn't have the temperament, political skills or knowledge of the issues to do a traditional debate.

None of those deficiencies mattered when he was winning the GOP nomination, but they do now.

He has displayed two gears: (1) The buffoonish, brutish, loud-mouthed salesman and (2) the tamed, frustrated teleprompter-reader. Neither of those require the precise intellectual dexterity that a candidate must possess when going up against an experienced politician in a nationally-televised debate.

That said, no doubt he'd love more debates, because BELIEVE ME!


.

Erm... he did fine in the debate. You are biased beyond belief. He is a very good speaker as well, whether you agree with him or not. Just a fact...

 

[bullwinkle]

He breezes through them will ease and by increasing the number it prevents the MSM from coordinating their response with centralized orchestration like with the first debate, and will also make managing Crooked Hillary's severe medical issues easier to expose, like her coughing episode yesterday which was previously cured with 3 days of antibiotics.

Oct 4 is the VP debate. My guess is the MSM have already planned and rehearsed their response as to why Pence didn't really win. They will possibly use a fat, qu33r immigrant as their poster child who is so happy being married to another qu33r. The poster child qu33rs now have a house, picket fence, a dog and are working on their first offspring with the help of local scientists and look forward to free college.

Oct 9 is the second President debate. And it "will take the form of a town meeting, in which half of the questions will be posed directly by citizen participants and the other half will be posed by the moderator based on topics of broad public interest as reflected in social media and other sources. " It is strange the establishment uses the sexist word "broad" so much but probably the hottest topic in social media is Crooked Hillary's apparent Parkinson's disease. I wonder if that topic will be brought up since unlike other diseases, it invariably result in severe dementia.

Snouter, it's curious how differently you and I see the debates. Trump didn't look comfortable at all to me. He looked petulant and petty. And I get so darn miffed that he seldom, if ever, completes a sentence. He leaves one dangling and goes on to the next without finishing, often on a completely different subject making it look like a diversion. His interruptions didn't help. And the after-excuses were weak too, about the mike and dais height, even if they were taken up with gusto by his sycophants.

However, your contempt for Americans who are gay clears up a lot of confusion about your preference of a candidate for president.

I suspect the word 'broad' is used because the first debate was limited to 3 subjects, and 'broad' will go a ways into satisfying all those who complain about how certain 'pet' topics outside the 3 focused issues weren't covered. I for one, appreciate a more in-depth debate on a few issues rather than all over the issue map when more debates are scheduled. Maybe the next debate will satisfy your 'gay' issue more clearly.

 

[Mac1958]

It was clear long before the first debate that Trump didn't have the temperament, political skills or knowledge of the issues to do a traditional debate.

None of those deficiencies mattered when he was winning the GOP nomination, but they do now.

He has displayed two gears: (1) The buffoonish, brutish, loud-mouthed salesman and (2) the tamed, frustrated teleprompter-reader. Neither of those require the precise intellectual dexterity that a candidate must possess when going up against an experienced politician in a nationally-televised debate.

That said, no doubt he'd love more debates, because BELIEVE ME!


.

Erm... he did fine in the debate. You are biased beyond belief. He is a very good speaker as well, whether you agree with him or not. Just a fact...

Even Republicans admit they were frustrated that he missed openings to go after Hillary. That's where the experience and intellectual dexterity are critical in a debate.

He also allowed himself to be cornered on the attacks in the second half of the debate. Same thing.

His fans thought he did great, sure, that was predictable. The question here is the undecideds.
.

 

[Snouter]

Crooked Hillary memorizing canned lines is NOT mental dexterity. If The Donald zombied out like Crooked Hillary and just stared and grinned like The Joker when The Donald talked about her melt down in Vegas, etc. then what? The MSM would be claiming he was on drugs, as Crooked Hillary obviously was.

You have to plan and be ready with a response in a matter of seconds. You have to practice and practice so when a good opening does come up, you can capitalize on it.

Good point in terms of debating democrats. But The Donald is truly such a nice, honest guy underneath it all, he is not used to doing that. No doubt he has got to get his game up for the American people and shred Crooked Hillary on the next one. IMO Pence is seriously badass and is going to fuck up Kaine and Crooked Hillary at the Pence/Kaine debate to set the stage.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Good point in terms of debating democrats. But The Donald is truly such a nice, honest guy underneath it all, he is not used to doing that. No doubt he has got to get his game up for the people and shred Crooked Hillary on the next one. IMO Pence is going to fuck up Kaine bad to set the stage.

Which is fine if anybody really paid attention to the VP debate, but nobody really does.

There were so many openings to attack Hillary in the last debate that it isn't funny. Not once do I recall him using the term Basket of Deplorables. And when Hil-liar said everybody in the country has prejudices against black people, Trump should have made that a half-hour of the debate so it would have made headlines for the next five weeks. Instead, MSM made sure they buried that comment.

Hillbilly did everything she could to make Trump look like he hated women. He could have done the exact same thing to her with her past and current comment about blacks and Trump voters. He needs to learn to stop interrupting her while she talks (makes him look rude and obnoxious) and think while she's talking instead.

 

[SwimExpert]

There has been speculation that Trump's aim all along was to be a Trojan horse and get Clinton elected. If that really is his goal them yes, he should request 20 more debates.

 

[LoneLaugher]

It was clear long before the first debate that Trump didn't have the temperament, political skills or knowledge of the issues to do a traditional debate.

None of those deficiencies mattered when he was winning the GOP nomination, but they do now.

He has displayed two gears: (1) The buffoonish, brutish, loud-mouthed salesman and (2) the tamed, frustrated teleprompter-reader. Neither of those require the precise intellectual dexterity that a candidate must possess when going up against an experienced politician in a nationally-televised debate.

That said, no doubt he'd love more debates, because BELIEVE ME!


.

Erm... he did fine in the debate. You are biased beyond belief. He is a very good speaker as well, whether you agree with him or not. Just a fact...

This is interesting. Now for some truth.

Donald Trump is not a very good speaker.

Hillary Clinton is not a very good speaker.

Donald Trump did not do fine in that debate.

Hillary Clinton did well enough in that debate to win it.

Mac is not biased beyond belief. He is unbiased beyond belief.

Mac will now claim, with a straight face, that you and I represent opposite sides of the same coin.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There has been speculation that Trump's aim all along was to be a Trojan horse and get Clinton elected. If that really is his goal them yes, he should request 20 more debates.

Yeah, I'm sure he spent all this time and money to get Hillary elected. After all, he really has nothing better to do.

 

[SwimExpert]

There has been speculation that Trump's aim all along was to be a Trojan horse and get Clinton elected. If that really is his goal them yes, he should request 20 more debates.

Yeah, I'm sure he spent all this time and money to get Hillary elected. After all, he really has nothing better to do.

He doesn't.

 

[Snouter]

LoneLaugher, can you post something that supports your claim Crooked Hillary is a good speaker?

Follow up, do you consider the anal sex porn woman Crooked Hillary invoked after The Donald discussed the Iran Deal disaster a win?

If so, what are you fucked up on man. Come on. Get off the drugs.

 

[Crixus]

Norman, it is true all Crooked Hillary can do is fling bogus personal insults. And the Clintons are famous more being clever in the mud with the help of the MSM. But there are a couple of simple things The Donald can do to neutralize Crooked Hillary's lies and deception and force her to address the facts.

No, but she can present her case while at the same time having a hook in Donald. He did not just lose his debate, hiller had him on strings and made him dance. Trump should have won. A pumpkin sitting on the podium should have won a debate with Hillery, but he lost. He has to nail it from here on out if he expects to win.