Should IanC's Racist Threads be Equally Valued?

[Ravi]

Mani has been known to comment on posts of zero value.

For example, he comments on my posts.

Now show where I have stated that AA wasn't racist.

You said discrimination based on race isn't racism. You defined racism narrowly as believing in the inherent superiority of one race over another.

If you REALLY REALLY REALLY want me to go find the links then make it worth my while.

***** a little more and call me out in the flame zone. I'll then be happy to oblige.

That is the definition of racism.

 

[Ravi]

Poor grammar is a sign of poor intelligence. Unless English is your second language, Ian, you should quit posting until you can make yourself at least look intelligent.

he'd look intelligent if he posted in white font.

Nah...

 

[manifold]

Now show where I have stated that AA wasn't racist.

You said discrimination based on race isn't racism. You defined racism narrowly as believing in the inherent superiority of one race over another.

If you REALLY REALLY REALLY want me to go find the links then make it worth my while.

***** a little more and call me out in the flame zone. I'll then be happy to oblige.

That is the definition of racism.

It is A definition. But there is more than one.

 

[del]

Poor grammar is a sign of poor intelligence. Unless English is your second language, Ian, you should quit posting until you can make yourself at least look intelligent.

he'd look intelligent if he posted in white font.

Nah...

you're probably right.

again. *sigh*

 

[Ravi]

You said discrimination based on race isn't racism. You defined racism narrowly as believing in the inherent superiority of one race over another.

If you REALLY REALLY REALLY want me to go find the links then make it worth my while.

***** a little more and call me out in the flame zone. I'll then be happy to oblige.

That is the definition of racism.

It is A definition. But there is more than one.

Nope. It is the only one.

 

[Ravi]

he'd look intelligent if he posted in white font.

Nah...

you're probably right.

again. *sigh*

 

[manifold]

That is the definition of racism.

It is A definition. But there is more than one.

Nope. It is the only one.

Glad to know I can group you in with Lonestar as believing that segregation and anti-miscegenation laws are not racist.

 

[Ravi]

It is A definition. But there is more than one.

Nope. It is the only one.

Glad to know I can group you in with Lonestar as believing that segregation and anti-miscegenation laws are not racist.

If they are based on the belief that blacks are inferior then they certainly are racist.

I can't imagine that even you would think they weren't based on that belief.

 

[Samson]

I just gave you one. Grammar is absolutely vital when trying to make yourself understood and convince those that disagree with you to see your point. You've convinced no one of anything...you've had a few chimps that agree with you applaud you, but that is all.

perhaps, perhaps not. pointing things out to people is good enough in its own right. I never would have read The Bell Curve if I hadn't read two specious and strident books denouncing it.

I wouldn't expect anyone to publicly agree with me here because of the taint of political correctness anyways.

I've never noticed any societal pressure to agree with retards.

I'm forced to agree with you.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

especially on elite messageboards like USMB, and other forums that people post to, IanC's threads are admittedly marked with lower grammatical proficiency, receive lower replies and pass independent scrutiny at a lower rate than other people's threads. is it reasonable to give him the same credit for a thread when the chances are that they will underwhelm?

I love the grammatical errors in a post faulting a poster for grammatical errors .

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Poor grammar is a sign of poor intelligence. .

Or simply not caring about grammar.

 

[Samson]

Quote: Originally Posted by Ravi
btw, Ian, if these kids aren't genetically tested to prove race how can we be sure that the data is even correct? I always put "other" when I fill out these race questionnaires...heck, sometimes I even LIE.

hmmm...if you put other then you basically don't get counted. but if you lie...interesting. you would probably hurt both averages.

hahaha. you never answered whether you understood this little dig at you. do you need me to explain it to you? hahaha

I'm taking a page out of Sampson's playbook by asking the same question over and over.

Ravi--do you understand the insult in this message or not? I think you don't. hahaha

Gee....if imitation is supposed to be the highest form of flattery, why do I feel I need a shower.

 

[Ravi]

perhaps, perhaps not. pointing things out to people is good enough in its own right. I never would have read The Bell Curve if I hadn't read two specious and strident books denouncing it.

I wouldn't expect anyone to publicly agree with me here because of the taint of political correctness anyways.

I've never noticed any societal pressure to agree with retards.

I'm forced to agree with you.

Ouch! That was just mean. Damn mean.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Now show where I have stated that AA wasn't racist.

You said discrimination based on race isn't racism. You defined racism narrowly as believing in the inherent superiority of one race over another.

If you REALLY REALLY REALLY want me to go find the links then make it worth my while.

***** a little more and call me out in the flame zone. I'll then be happy to oblige.

That is the definition of racism.

# S: (n) racism (the prejudice that members of one race are intrinsically superior to members of other races)
# S: (n) racism, racialism, racial discrimination (discriminatory or abusive behavior towards members of another race)

WordNet Search - 3.0

See definition #2

 

[☭proletarian☭]

That is the definition of racism.

It is A definition. But there is more than one.

Nope. It is the only one.

Do you own a dictionary?

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Nope. It is the only one.

Glad to know I can group you in with Lonestar as believing that segregation and anti-miscegenation laws are not racist.

If they are based on the belief that blacks are inferior then they certainly are racist.

I can't imagine that even you would think they weren't based on that belief.

I can believe that two groups are better off not mixing without believing either superior to the other.

I can discriminate against any race, btw. You probably think only white people can be racist against non-whites.

 

[Samson]

I've never noticed any societal pressure to agree with retards.

I'm forced to agree with you.

Ouch! That was just mean. Damn mean.

Awwwww....dahlin'.....Ah, jest funnin' wid ya!

******hugs Ravi******

 

[Ravi]

Glad to know I can group you in with Lonestar as believing that segregation and anti-miscegenation laws are not racist.

If they are based on the belief that blacks are inferior then they certainly are racist.

I can't imagine that even you would think they weren't based on that belief.

I can believe that two groups are better off not mixing without believing either superior to the other.

I can discriminate against any race, btw. You probably think only white people can be racist against non-whites.

Do I? I doubt it.

 

[manifold]

especially on elite messageboards like USMB, and other forums that people post to, IanC's threads are admittedly marked with lower grammatical proficiency, receive lower replies and pass independent scrutiny at a lower rate than other people's threads. is it reasonable to give him the same credit for a thread when the chances are that they will underwhelm?

I love the grammatical errors in a post faulting a poster for grammatical errors .

You're pretty new here, so I'm going to go ahead and give you a pass for not understanding the concept of a thread aping.

 

[manifold]

I commend your efforts Pro, but you're wasting your time with Ravi. She's a devoted agenda whore and more than willing to compromise any and all intellectual honesty in support of her agenda.

Discriminating against somebody for no reason other than their race is as clear an example of racism as anyone can ask for. I know this. You know this. Anyone with two working brain cells and a modicum of intellectual honesty knows this. Ravi and Lonestar are two sides of the same hypocritical coin. He says laws that forbid interracial marriage are not racist, but affirmative action is. She says the exact opposite. They are both wrong and they both know it.

So just ask yourself why they would be willing to whore themselves for something they know to be untrue?