No, not talking about Hillary again.
This is about the YouTube shooter.
Family of alleged YouTube shooter warned police 'she might do something'
That's right, a die hard Vegan and animal rights supporter.
And yes, the police were warned and did nothing.
Blah, blah, blah.
Let's consider this thread and the author.
Today it's apparent the shooter was a troubled individual, and her parents notified the authorities.
What could local authorities legally do? Clearly, the author of this idiot-gram, thread variety, has no clue.
Should the Police have put out a BOLO, and been notified the young women had a gun? If they did, under what authority did the police have in disarming her?
What proof did the parents have that she was troubled and a threat? Police and other agencies (Probation, Social Service, county health) commonly receive calls from persons making such allegations. And all of these agencies are running short of staff and resources, a result of the no tax, no way ideology of the GOP.
If they had issued a BOLO, the same author would have claimed they had no right to do so, since it would be an infringement of the 2nd A. and no violence had yet happened.
And, BTW, the author of this thread opened with an attack on HRC and a judgment based on his total ignorance of the law and jurisprudence.
Something obvious that he is not the only one who has no clue (see the post above for one more example).