Couple Called 911 After ‘Disoriented’ Woman Knocked on Their Door. She Froze to Death While Waiting for Help to Arrive: Lawsuit

[EvilCat Breath]

Legally. No

Ethically and morally he’s a piece of shit

So......

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I never claimed that. You claimed that if they offered any help they could be held responsible which is false. Go back to school and learn how to read.

If they offered any help they COULD be held responsible, which, incidentally, is exactly what you said. They could, not would, not must, COULD.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If they offered any help they COULD be held responsible, which, incidentally, is exactly what you said. They could, not would, not must, COULD.

Learn to ******* read! My God, are you senile, demented or just plain old retarded?

They cannot be held responsible for aiding the person. Read the part I quoted on your linked information.

It says: The Good Samaritan may be held liable if they are negligent in providing those services or if their negligence causes injury either to the person on whose behalf the Good Samaritan is performing services or to a foreseeable third party.

Key on the words in orange. Do you know what those words mean?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Learn to ******* read! My God, are you senile, demented or just plain old retarded?

They cannot be held responsible for aiding the person. Read the part I quoted on your linked information.

No matter how many times you want liability free aid, it doesn't say that. Injury resulting from negligently provided aid is actionable. Of course intentional injury will always be either criminal or tort. However you have YET to show something that says failure to render aid is actionable..

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No matter how many times you want liability free aid, it doesn't say that. Injury resulting from negligently provided aid is actionable. Of course intentional injury will always be either criminal or tort. However you have YET to show something that says failure to render aid is actionable..

You obviously cannot read orange text, yet you used it in your post. How is that possible?

I never said that failure to render aid is actionable. You claimed that any assistance made them liable which I proved is not true. Do I need to quote what you said again so you can have a child read it to you?

It says: The Good Samaritan may be held liable if they are negligent in providing those services or if their negligence causes injury either to the person on whose behalf the Good Samaritan is performing services or to a foreseeable third party.
Does your diploma say "Special education" somewhere on it? Make sure that child doesn't have an IEP for reading before having them read it for you.

 

[Mac-7]

Having a mental condition is not an excuse for what happened.

In fact the cops at LEAST… should have realized that and dealt with it accordingly

The guy who locked her out in the cold is just pure shit

Ok, do you want to shoot the 9-11 operator, the cops or the people in the apartment?

Or just throw them all in prison?

Its not a perfect world we live in and no one is to blame for a series of accidents that added up to the woman’s death

 

[Jarlaxle]

I would have helped in some way.

And I think poorly of anyone else who wouldn't have, even if I can acknowledge the initial reluctance.

It's not worth the risk. It's a high rick-low reward gamble.

It's the state of the world we live in today. You hear all the time of people helping strangers - then those strangers killing the good samaritans.
Myself - I would have realized the situation of a young woman freezing to death and would had got her out of the cold until help arrived. But, I can understand why many people would be hesitant.

Or a man helping a woman and getting accused of something. Not worth the risk.

Legally there is no obligation to help anyone. Now had the they helped her and she died of unknown causes, they would be fully responsible.

Or had she accused them of assaulting her.

You are a scared little man.

No, he is prudent.