- Thread starter
- #141
Does anybody ever miss the point more than you? Duke is #1 in the nation. The skin color of the coach has nothing to do with that.Who is the coach for Duke. They have had black basketball players there for decades now, but I guess none of them were more qualified than this guy.
View attachment 1089629
Who was the coach before him?
View attachment 1089630
Who was the coach before him?
View attachment 1089632
And before him?
View attachment 1089633
White is a race, and for most of the 249 years America has been a country whites have hired, been admitted into colleges, picked sports teams, and everything else based on color.
Those like you disingenuously try arguing using basketball or football but:
View attachment 1089627
You never talk about all the sports that are predominantly white.
Sports had to be integrated because whites wouldn't let blacks play. But now we see whites whining about 2 sports in order to argue dishonestly about the non athletic workplace.
When more people of color start taking an interest in hockey and make the effort to learn and excel in the game, I'm pretty sure there will be more people of color on hockey teams. To assume that they are not common now is not due to racism unless that is on the part of black people. But there are a couple of dozen black players in the NHL now and as soon as one or two of those becomes a super star, I am pretty sure a lot more black kids will become more interested in hockey. Gradually we are seeing more black athletes in tennis, golf and other sports that black people have traditionally not shown a big interest in.
It isn't always racism or even usually racism. It is usually more a cultural thing or what is of interest.
But I'm pretty sure that is way over your head. Have a nice day.
Last edited: