Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is separation of church and state in the constitution?If we truly believe in Separation of Church and State why de we allow so called reverends to run for office. Seems to be this should bar any clergyman be it a minister, priest or rabbi from holding office.
It ain't there. Libs are wrong on this one. If Congress wants to set up a national religion, they can do so.Where is separation of church and state in the constitution?
No they can't. It violates the 1st amendment.It ain't there. Libs are wrong on this one. If Congress wants to set up a national religion, they can do so.
To the Marxists anything public especially schools, there cant be any teaching of God, because then the kids grow up knowing God will take care of them, not government. But what is so fucking hypocritical is when Rafael Wormnocker, advertises for running for senate and he is still a murdering baby killer minister for BLM blacks. What is worse, are the dumbass blacks in Georgia who will vote for such an EVIL creature.If we truly believe in Separation of Church and State why de we allow so called reverends to run for office. Seems to be this should bar any clergyman be it a minister, priest or rabbi from holding office.
Start with taxing churches and banning them from being used as voting sitesIf we truly believe in Separation of Church and State why de we allow so called reverends to run for office. Seems to be this should bar any clergyman be it a minister, priest or rabbi from holding office.
Good point. Black politicians who assume the title of Reverend are usually democrats and they get a pass in the political arena. There are no Christian priests in recent political positions nor are there any white Christian pastors. The modern version of "separation of church and state" had no basis in Constitutional law and was an invention of a liberal Supreme Court in the late 40's. The majority opinion was authored by a former KKK member who was appointed to the Court by FDR. The reason for the decision seems to be centered on the proliferation of Christian and mostly Catholic elementary schools that were springing up at the time. The FDR loyalists in the Court wanted to stop the challenge to the federal education system and a former KKK member who once pledged an abiding hatred toward Papists as well as blacks would be the perfect ploy.If we truly believe in Separation of Church and State why de we allow so called reverends to run for office. Seems to be this should bar any clergyman be it a minister, priest or rabbi from holding office.
Good point. Black politicians who assume the title of Reverend are usually democrats and they get a pass in the political arena. There are no Christian priests in recent political positions nor are there any white Christian pastors. The modern version of "separation of church and state" had no basis in Constitutional law and was an invention of a liberal Supreme Court in the late 40's. The majority opinion was authored by a former KKK member who was appointed to the Court by FDR. The reason for the decision seems to be centered on the proliferation of Christian and mostly Catholic elementary schools that were springing up at the time. The FDR loyalists in the Court wanted to stop the challenge to the federal education system and a former KKK member who once pledged an abiding hatred toward Papists as well as blacks would be the perfect ploy.
Everson v Board of Education 1947. Justice Black majority opinionWhat ruling is this supposedly?
Everson v Board of Education 1947. Justice Black majority opinion
The First Amendment.Where is separation of church and state in the constitution?
Good point. Black politicians who assume the title of Reverend are usually democrats and they get a pass in the political arena. There are no Christian priests in recent political positions nor are there any white Christian pastors. The modern version of "separation of church and state" had no basis in Constitutional law and was an invention of a liberal Supreme Court in the late 40's. The majority opinion was authored by a former KKK member who was appointed to the Court by FDR. The reason for the decision seems to be centered on the proliferation of Christian and mostly Catholic elementary schools that were springing up at the time. The FDR loyalists in the Court wanted to stop the challenge to the federal education system and a former KKK member who once pledged an abiding hatred toward Papists as well as blacks would be the perfect ploy.
Dumbass blacks in Georgia? I can't imagine why black folk aren't just swarming to join your party.To the Marxists anything public especially schools, there cant be any teaching of God, because then the kids grow up knowing God will take care of them, not government. But what is so fucking hypocritical is when Rafael Wormnocker, advertises for running for senate and he is still a murdering baby killer minister for BLM blacks. What is worse, are the dumbass blacks in Georgia who will vote for such an EVIL creature.
Raphael Warnock Called 'A Servant Of Satan' For 'Pro-Choice Pastor' Claims
The controversial senator is on the spotlight again for calling himself a "pro-choice pastor" - an obvious contradiction.www.christianitydaily.com
who said we believe in something that doesnt exist???If we truly believe in Separation of Church and State why de we allow so called reverends to run for office. Seems to be this should bar any clergyman be it a minister, priest or rabbi from holding office.