Senator Warren wants to pack 4 more judges on the Supreme Court

[AZrailwhale]

You cannot demonstrate this to be true.

It wasn’t until FDR stacked the court after it blocked most of his New Deal programs by offering the sitting justices platinum parachutes if they would retire immediately.

 

[easyt65]

Warren also wants an insurrection, which she called for publicly...for which she should be in DC Gitmo tonight....

 

[Lesh]

That's not what they're doing. They're pissed because these educators are perverting their kids and allowing them to be raped in their bathrooms. They also are pissed about the mask mandates.

That IS what they are doing. At least the ones on the DOJ radar...

Protest respectfully all you want but threaten violence and it's a different animal

 

[Lesh]

It wasn’t until FDR stacked the court after it blocked most of his New Deal programs by offering the sitting justices platinum parachutes if they would retire immediately.

FDR THREATENED to pack the courts but did not...

 

[rightwinger]

this didn’t age well

The Texas law is blatantly unconstitutional and sets a precedent that goes way beyond abortion

Private citizens suing for violations of the law?

 

[DBA]

And you're actually gullible enough to believe that.

The Republicans cheated and lied to get three justices that were chosen for one reason alone and that was their prescribed, very much minority opinion on Roe versus Wade.

The only partisan judges are those that ignore the overreach of Roe v Wade and vote not to overturn it. That would be Democrats.

 

[struth]

The Texas law is blatantly unconstitutional and sets a precedent that goes way beyond abortion

Private citizens suing for violations of the law?

yeah private citizens sue all the time for violations of the law. Someone hits you, they can be charged with a crime, and you can sue. This isn't a new concept.

 

[Lesh]

You clearly don't understand Roe v Wade. It was a horrible decision that was NOT based on the Constitution that should have been struck down years ago. Most legal experts agree even those that are pro-choice.

Names and links please

 

[struth]

Names and links please

RBJ for one....https://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_059254.pdf

 

[mudwhistle]

That IS what they are doing. At least the ones on the DOJ radar...

Protest respectfully all you want but threaten violence and it's a different animal

Again.....you're missing the point.

But that's okay....anyone who still has a Ukraine flag on their account is never going to change or see the light.

 

[Lesh]

Again.....you're missing the point.

But that's okay....anyone who still has a Ukraine flag on their account is never going to change or see the light.

Again...I am not missing anything.

The DOJ was only going after "parents" who were making terroristic threats and engaging in terroristic actions

And why would you hae a problem with the Ukraine flag?

 

[mudwhistle]

Again...I am not missing anything.

The DOJ was only going after "parents" who were making terroristic threats and engaging in terroristic actions

And why would you hae a problem with the Ukraine flag?

The DOJ can't tell what is a terroristic threat anymore.
They have politicized the justice system........because they claim saying "We need a call to arms" is only a threat if a Trump Supporter says it.....or uses the wrong pronoun.
If the Lesbo Mayor of Chicago says the same thing....they consider that righteous indignation and totally harmless.

As with your highly likely support of censorship on Big Tech platforms it's clear any angry statement is considered a threat to your fragile personal dignity. Maybe we should just arrest all of the Republican voters that scare you by pointing a gun finger in your general direction....or shows you a picture of their AR-15, better known as "BIG SCARY GUN".

You people spent the last 2 plus years supporting terrorists while calling people who have a right to be angry terrorists.

 

[hadit]

The DOJ can't tell what is a terroristic threat anymore.
They have politicized the justice system........because they claim saying "We need a call to arms" is only a threat if a Trump Supporter says it.....or uses the wrong pronoun.
If the Lesbo Mayor of Chicago says the same thing....they consider that righteous indignation and totally harmless.

As with your highly likely support of censorship on Big Tech platforms it's clear any angry statement is considered a threat to your fragile personal dignity. Maybe we should just arrest all of the Republican voters that scare you by pointing a gun finger in your general direction....or shows you a picture of their AR-15, better known as "BIG SCARY GUN".

You people spent the last 2 plus years supporting terrorists while calling people who have a right to be angry terrorists.

Don't forget black. Big black and scary is how they fear guns. Paint that thing pink and watch the protests fade.

 

[mudwhistle]

Warren also wants an insurrection, which she called for publicly...for which she should be in DC Gitmo tonight....

No......Gitmo is too cushy....they need to have her breaking rocks at Leavenworth.

 

[eagle1462010]

Send her to India. They are Indians too lmao

 

[Lesh]

The DOJ can't tell what is a terroristic threat anymore.

The fuck they can't

They have politicized the justice system.

No. You're a politicized idiot

 

[eagle1462010]

The fuck they can't

No. You're a politicisezed idiot

As they refuse to enforce the law again. Nothing but a DNC tool at this point

 

[Lesh]

As they refuse to enforce the law again. Nothing but a DNC tool at this point

I know that was supposed to mean something but it didn’t

 

[mudwhistle]

The fuck they can't

No. You're a politicized idiot

No....you're just willfully-ignorant.

 

[mudwhistle]

No....you're just willfully-ignorant.

Comey admitted what he did in public....yet you keep calling me a liar.
ATTENTION: WORDS HAVE MEANING.