Senator Warren wants to pack 4 more judges on the Supreme Court

[eagle1462010]

I know that was supposed to mean something but it didn’t

Your side only cares about the law when it doesnt affect you

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That's not what they're doing.

Except the ones who have been arrested for it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The only partisan judges are those that ignore the overreach of Roe v Wade and vote not to overturn it. That would be Democrats.

A idiotic comment. Especially in light of both the many conservative judges who have upheld it and the fact that the three Trump abortion fairy judges all had to lie about it in their confirmations. So, you lie too. It's the marching orders.

 

[DBA]

A idiotic comment. Especially in light of both the many conservative judges who have upheld it and the fact that the three Trump abortion fairy judges all had to lie about it in their confirmations. So, you lie too. It's the marching orders.

Maybe you should just wait to read the ruling. Not that you will read it with an open mind, but at least give it a shot. The Democrats who will likely disagree will have a much tougher time writing their dissent. They may be forced to take the easy way out and simply claim it is settled law as if that is any justification. Arguing the law's merits based on the Constitution is a no-win situation.

 

[BS Filter]

A idiotic comment. Especially in light of both the many conservative judges who have upheld it and the fact that the three Trump abortion fairy judges all had to lie about it in their confirmations. So, you lie too. It's the marching orders.

I assume you believe in the fairytale of "Settled Law". Correct?

 

[DBA]

A idiotic comment. Especially in light of both the many conservative judges who have upheld it and the fact that the three Trump abortion fairy judges all had to lie about it in their confirmations. So, you lie too. It's the marching orders.

Just to add to this. The last time this Roe v Wade was challenged was Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The plurality's basis for not overturning Roe v Wade was largely based on stare decisis, not the merits of the law. It is the primary function of the Supreme Court to uphold the Constitution and if that means correcting past unconstitutional rulings, so be it. It isn't as if that hasn't been done before. Even the Supreme Court makes mistakes and Roe v Wade was a large one.

 

[mudwhistle]

Just to add to this. The last time this Roe v Wade was challenged was Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The plurality's basis for not overturning Roe v Wade was largely based on stare decisis, not the merits of the law. It is the primary function of the Supreme Court to uphold the Constitution and if that means correcting past unconstitutional rulings, so be it. It isn't as if that hasn't been done before. Even the Supreme Court makes mistakes and Roe v Wade was a large one.

Yuge.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Maybe you should just wait to read the ruling. Not that you will read it with an open mind, but at least give it a shot. The Democrats who will likely disagree will have a much tougher time writing their dissent. They may be forced to take the easy way out and simply claim it is settled law as if that is any justification. Arguing the law's merits based on the Constitution is a no-win situation.

I understand the arguments. They are the same arguments that have failed repeatedly in front of judges appointed by both parties

Then the GOP lied and cheated to get 3 judges to get a prescribed decision. Trump and McConnell explicitly said they would do it, then they did it. It's not a secret.

That's what history will record. Your equivocation will not be a footnote.

And now we get to watch the fireworks in the states. Look for ad hoc religious groups to apply for religious exemptions from the draconian state laws. Look for Democrat statehouse to pass similar, weaselly laws as Texas passed, but regarding pet issues of the right wing, to out them to the test in court.

 

[AZrailwhale]

FDR THREATENED to pack the courts but did not...

He in effect did. He forced the majority of the Justices to retire by political pressure over the years. He changed the entire composition of the court by appointing pro-new deal activist judges, his friends and politicians who owed him political favors. By 1941 he had appointed the entire court.

 

[AZrailwhale]

FDR THREATENED to pack the courts but did not...

He appointed NINE justices in ten years.

 

[otto105]

The woman has the IQ of a carrot

Yeah, and you with you HS diploma.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There is s 6-3 majority for overturning Roe in the Supreme Court...something vby 30% of the population

That's sounds pretty UNdemocratic

The 70% should be able to pass the laws they want on their state level.

 

[struth]

A idiotic comment. Especially in light of both the many conservative judges who have upheld it and the fact that the three Trump abortion fairy judges all had to lie about it in their confirmations. So, you lie too. It's the marching orders.

Even RBG thought it was incorrectly decided.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They said they wouldn't seat garland a year before an election and then sat ACB with just a few months before an election. It was stolen. Obama had the right to seat his pick.

They said they wouldn't seat garland a year before an election

Yes. President and Senate of different parties.

and then sat ACB with just a few months before an election.

President and Senate of the same party.

It was stolen. Obama had the right to seat his pick.

LOL! Elections have consequences.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The reason they didn't have even a hearing is because smart people would of found out that they rejected garland because the right wing wanted to wait to install their own pick and stole a seat on the supreme. You got nothing.

The reason they didn't have even a hearing is because

Because Fuck You!

the right wing wanted to wait to install their own pick

You're damn right. Suck it!

You got nothing.

Except that seat on the Court.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If the Senate just gets to pick a year out from an election who gets to get a hearing and vote for supreme court nominees then it's the Senate picking who will sit on the court and not the president.

Advice and consent. Or in Garland's case.....NOT!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So did McConnell have a hearing for garland like the constitution demands.

The Constitution doesn't demand hearings. Liar.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why cause he didn't want the american people to find out he was blocking a supreme court nominee for Obama.

Blocking the shit out of him.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Elizabeth Warren has said 'it's time' to start packing the Supreme Court, claiming that the current set of judges 'threaten the democratic foundations of our nation.'
She said she supported expanding the high court by at least four seats and urged Congress to act after the 'extremist' justices upheld the 'racist Muslim ban' and 'threatened to eliminate Roe v. Wade.'

Elizabeth Warren calls for expansion of the Supreme Court

The progressive Senator claimed the 'radical court' had 'trampled on the Constitution' and urged Congress to restore 'balance and integrity to the broken institution.'

www.dailymail.co.uk

Comment:
Warren is a delusional far left extremist.
There was no "Muslim ban" and Muslims are not a race.
Reversing Roe v Wade would just make abortion a State issue.
The real threat to our democracy are the corrupt Democrat Party's abuses of power.
Obama illegally used the IRS, CIA, FBI, DOJ and FISA court as political weapons, and he got away with it.
The corrupt Democrat Senator Adam Schiff is fabricating evidence in a 110% political witch hunt.
The corrupt Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton illegally destroyed incriminating evidence, and she got away with it.
The Democrat Party's crazy Russian Collusion conspiracy and the Mueller Report was a thinly veiled coup attempt against President Trump.
Pelosi's two bogus impeachments against Trump were a blow against our democracy.
The Democrats are using the Tech Giants to censor political opinions.
Blocking Voter ID laws and mandating Mail-In ballots are a threat to legitimate secure elections and a threat to our democracy.
But finally, packing the Supreme Court with far left extremist judges does not girder our democracy, it does the opposite.
The Voters of MA should be ashamed of themselves.

Sad she wasn't aborted. Kill one to save millions

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Threats of violence arent protected by the first amendment.
When threats against school boards are widespread, then it needs a national response.

Send in the national guard!!!