Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I said you wanted them to do something worse. You did not say it, I did, clearly therefore I think it's worse. I can't believe I have to explain this to you. It's like explaining chess to the pigeon that's walking all over the board pooping on it.No, you said I want something worse. I don't. Please try to keep this straught:
You
.
.
.
.
Me
They are separate. Thanks.
Glad you admit it hasn't happened yet. Some on here are acting like it has.What bizarre equivocation. What silly, blinded stuttering.
"But you might get a rubber stamp Republican Supreme court"
Gee, I hope THAT doesn't happen... wtf
I don't want them to do something worse. That's 3 times now. Move on, or sit there and play with your own poo. Your call.I said you wanted them to do something worse. You did not say it, I did, clearly therefore I think it's worse. I can't believe I have to explain this to you. It's like explaining chess to the pigeon that's walking all over the board pooping on it.
Basically, you have situational ethics and only care who is doing the thing you're either mad about or applauding.
I didn't admit that. In fact,I mocked that idea, as anyone with a functioning brain cell can discern from my post.Glad you admit it hasn't happened yet. Some on here are acting like it has.
Exactly, you mocked the idea that we could have a Republican rubber stamp Court. Some on here, however, seem to think we already have such. I am agreeing that nothing of the sort is going on.I didn't admit that. In fact,I mocked that idea, as anyone with a functioning brain cell can discern from my post.
See? You're like a child.
You want them to do something I think is worse. Has that managed to sink in yet?I don't want them to do something worse. That's 3 times now. Move on, or sit there and play with your own poo. Your call.
HahahaExactly, you mocked the idea that we could have a Republican rubber stamp Court.
There you go, using your big boy words now. Good job.You want them to do something I think is worse. Has that managed to sink in yet?
I can always tell when you've run out of ammo.There you go, using your big boy words now. Good job.
We will, however, get one if the democrats go full blown insane and pack the court. The next Republican administration will just add more and appoint more and the court will sink into irrelevancy.Hahaha
No.
Damn son. You are in a full on tailspin.
Oh no!We will, however, get one if the democrats go full blown insane and pack the court
If tey make terroristic threats and actions it sure as hell is ...dick wadIf a parent gets out of line, that isn't the job of the FBI, dickwad.
That's not what they're doing. They're pissed because these educators are perverting their kids and allowing them to be raped in their bathrooms. They also are pissed about the mask mandates.If tey make terroristic threats and actions it sure as hell is ...dick wad
is that all the stuff you use to justify violence, i.e you dont like gays.Well the only reason it may be widespread is because the left is teaching porn in the classroom nationwide.
But in reality....Obama's ACORN which switched their name to SEIU is now teaching porn all over the world.
They call themselves SKITTLES AND SPLASH.
Skittles is for kid 12-18 and Splash is for kids in Kindergarten up to 11.
View attachment 642865
Links
An Adorable, Accessible Way to Explain a Complicated Concept » The Genderbread Person
Breaking a complicated concept into bite-sized, digestible pieces. So, you want to better understand gender, or need help explaining it to someone else? Used by — and contributed to by — countless people around the world and throughout the decades, the genderbread person (and all of the...www.genderbread.org
View attachment 642869
GAY TIMES and SKITTLES® to host Eurovision party at Everyman Broadgate
GAY TIMES is teaming up with SKITTLES® to host a fabulous, large-scale screening event for the Eurovision Song Contest 2022.www.gaytimes.co.uk
About
We clean water for kids. | Splash is a social justice organization committed to the poor, an international development agency disciplined around urban economies, a social enterprise dedicated to putting ourselves out of business, and a safe water company focused on children. Put this odd...development.splash.org
Skittles Launches Gray Pride Packs Featuring Designs by LGBTQ+ Artists
In a June full of rainbows, Skittles is going gray again.www.pride.com
No more than liberals have done by nominating and confirming liberal and ultra-liberal justices when they controlled the Senate and Presidency.Well the cons packed the court.
There is nothing saying the a Senate has to vote on a nominee. Obama was within his rights to nominate potential justices until he found one that was acceptable to both him and the Senate. He chose not to do so. Typically of Obama, it was his way or the highway.They could have held the vote and rejected Garland, then The Fragile One would have had to start all over. Same result. They operated under the rules in play at the time, only moving to fill a vacancy caused by a sitting Justice leaving the bench. Packing is adding an arbitrary number of seats then finding idealogues to put in them.
No.....it's not that. My sister is gay.is that all the stuff you use to justify violence, i.e you dont like gays.
this didn’t age wellLike allowing the Texas abortion law to stand
Blatantly unconstitutional
Sorry, you need to read the Constitution. The Senate does have the right to determine who sits on SCOTUS. All the president can do is nominate potential justices. When the opposition controls the Senate, presidential nominees have almost never been confirmed in an election year.If the Senate just gets to pick a year out from an election who gets to get a hearing and vote for supreme court nominees then it's the Senate picking who will sit on the court and not the president. Which isn't the way it's supposed to go. They didn't want a hearing because McConnell knew that it was unlikely a democratic president would win after eight years because of the history of presidential elections.
Garland was qualified and the right wing didn't want hearings because they couldn't find any good reason to not seat him on the court.
Nope, it’s a matter for local law enforcement.Threats of violence arent protected by the first amendment.
When threats against school boards are widespread, then it needs a national response.
