Saving Polar Bears without destroying Economy

Laslow

Platinum Member
Mar 2, 2022
507
458
528
Instead of a forced transition to EV, why don't we just up our grants for green energy? We can say we are leading the world on creating clean fuel ideas, while at the same time ramping back up our gas and fuel production. To make it better, we can create things that don't need Chinese Materials. Right now, China is laughing its butt off at Western Society tanking their economies while at the same time being forced to buy things China controls. We can save the polar bears by being the green leader in technology, take a market away from China, and let Europe, Australia, and Canada chop wood. In about thirty years, when the technology is good enough, maybe people would actually CHOOSE it as a better option. Would the left and the greenies accept such an arrangement?
 
Instead of a forced transition to EV, why don't we just up our grants for green energy? We can say we are leading the world on creating clean fuel ideas, while at the same time ramping back up our gas and fuel production. To make it better, we can create things that don't need Chinese Materials. Right now, China is laughing its butt off at Western Society tanking their economies while at the same time being forced to buy things China controls. We can save the polar bears by being the green leader in technology, take a market away from China, and let Europe, Australia, and Canada chop wood. In about thirty years, when the technology is good enough, maybe people would actually CHOOSE it as a better option. Would the left and the greenies accept such an arrangement?

Instead of a forced transition to EV, why don't we just up our grants for green energy?

Excellent!!!

How many new nuclear power plants should we build?
 
Instead of a forced transition to EV, why don't we just up our grants for green energy? We can say we are leading the world on creating clean fuel ideas, while at the same time ramping back up our gas and fuel production. To make it better, we can create things that don't need Chinese Materials. Right now, China is laughing its butt off at Western Society tanking their economies while at the same time being forced to buy things China controls. We can save the polar bears by being the green leader in technology, take a market away from China, and let Europe, Australia, and Canada chop wood. In about thirty years, when the technology is good enough, maybe people would actually CHOOSE it as a better option. Would the left and the greenies accept such an arrangement?
The goal is no more to save the polar bears for democrats as it is to save blacks or women or gays, etc.

Polar bears are just one more issue to virtue signal over, so they can promote their policies that will no more save the polar bear as other policies will save blacks and the rest of their social justice demagoguery.
 
I was just looking for some kind of logic the greenies would accept so that we could have cheap gas and the Germans would keep chopping wood.
 

Forum List

Back
Top