Ruth Bader Ginsberg.......I am not going anywhere

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ruth Bader Ginsberg just gave Trump the finger

What % of people that reach 85 go on to reach age 90?

She has about a 60% chance to make 90.

Actuarial Life Table

 

[Borillar]

Robert Bork was treated just like any other nominee. He was given a Senate hearing and a full Senate vote which he lost 58-42

Reagan’s next choice Kennedy was easily accepted

That is how the process works

Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented

Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented

You are incorrect.

Really? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?

Really.

U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789

Show us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyone

View attachment 207722

In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.

View attachment 207724

Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.

Interesting. So you have to go back 150 years to find a similar instance and it was during the tenure of one of the two Presidents to go through impeachment proceedings.

 

[Mike473]

Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented

You are incorrect.

Really? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?

Really.

U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789

Show us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyone

View attachment 207722

In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.

View attachment 207724

Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.

Interesting. So you have to go back 150 years to find a similar instance and it was during the tenure of one of the two Presidents to go through impeachment proceedings.

I guess they could have voted on Merrick Garland without bothering with the hearings. Then again, Merrick Garland was never getting on the Supreme Court, so it mattered very little in the end.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented

You are incorrect.

Really? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?

Really.

U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789

Show us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyone

View attachment 207722

In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.

View attachment 207724

Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.

Interesting. So you have to go back 150 years to find a similar instance and it was during the tenure of one of the two Presidents to go through impeachment proceedings.

9 earlier cases where the Senate took no action. Not unprecedented.

 

[Preacher]

Indeed. I am not a white nationalist. I am a Racial Loyalist. My ideology is Creativity and Racial Socialism. I am sure you have read Benjamin Klassen's books? That's what I adhere to. I am reading the Racial Loyalist Manifesto right now by Matthew Hale. You should give it a read,its interesting so far and I need to buy his other white White Slavery.

You are never going to get me to go that far.

I am not going to try to stop you from doing what you think you need to do for now because your radicalism helps purge the cucks, but you will be opposed by me directly at some point because defeating Western/white decline is all that we need.

If you were smart you would be more pragmatic and help people like me to move the overton window towards your direction.

People are either with me or against me. Matters not to me. My ONLY goal is the survival and advancement of the White race.

That is my goal as well.

Then I don't see a problem. I am just pretty much done trying to sway people to the correct view of things...I am more of a violence and war kind of person...I leave the academic and persuasive writing/talking to others who do it better.

I am a bit more radical when it comes to the solution in Europe.

Merkel should have her head on a pike and those migrant ghettos need to be dusted. Kai Murros has the right idea over there.

I agree but Europe is in FAR better shape than we are. Country after country is electing nationalist governments and they are taking their countries back. Their political systems are different there and since the majority of those countries are still pretty white and free of Jewish propaganda they can and do back their leaders pretty well and give them a free hand in fixing things. America is different between the Jewish owned and controlled media and their pet groups its hard to get much to change here. Hell its even harder when your own party lacks a backbone.

There are degrees of pro-white activism and white nationalism.

You are extreme even for a white nationalist site.

Indeed. I am not a white nationalist. I am a Racial Loyalist. My ideology is Creativity and Racial Socialism. I am sure you have read Benjamin Klassen's books? That's what I adhere to. I am reading the Racial Loyalist Manifesto right now by Matthew Hale. You should give it a read,its interesting so far and I need to buy his other white White Slavery.

You are never going to get me to go that far.

I am not going to try to stop you from doing what you think you need to do for now because your radicalism helps purge the cucks, but you will be opposed by me directly at some point because defeating Western/white decline is all that we need.

If you were smart you would be more pragmatic and help people like me to move the overton window towards your direction.

People are either with me or against me. Matters not to me. My ONLY goal is the survival and advancement of the White race.

That is my goal as well.

My ONLY goal is the survival and advancement of the White race.

No- not a complete outlier with Trump voters.

Go ahead and let you anti white hatred shine...we all know you hate White people...even if you are white its not a surprise there are lots of mentally ill disloyal scum like you who hate being white.

Retire or Die...either is fine with me. Maybe someone will Scalia her....we can only hope.

You're letting politics mean way too much if you actually think that.

She's a Jewess. She is the ultimate enemy. I care nothing about politics I care about what's best for my race and that old jewish bitch IS NOT good for my race.

Damn, you're one ignorant SOB. Lose the race baiting bullshit already.

.

Go wave your amurican flag,thump your constitution that's done NOTHING to stop the destruction of the very race that FOUNDED this fucking country. Race before anything else. PERIOD.

Maybe you should take your hillbilly ass to school and try learning some real history.

.

Triggered much snowflake. Read the naturalization acts of the 1790's and the federalist papers this country was intended for WHITE people and their progeny NOT some fucking rainbow nation of shit!

 

[Preacher]

Ginsburg doesn't have to croak or retire Breyer is 80 in just 2 weeks another leftist scum who might retire or die,Sotomayor is 64 and has diabetes which don't exactly help for a long life...she may retire before she is 70...ANY of the leftists dying or retiring will work. Hell Thomas retiring would be fine with me he is 70 and President Trump can then nominate someone young to take over his seat so its safe for 40 years.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Six months TOPS!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[JBond]

Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court

The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.

Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.

"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."

I am not disputing she said it, but want to watch the video of her saying it. How old is she? Can someone send a link of the video? Didn't pay attention to most of the thread.

 

[blastoff]

Anyone check the Vegas over/under re the old bag going another five years?

 

[Two Thumbs]

Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court

The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.

Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.

"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."

someone that openly hates the Constitution after the First Amendment should have been dragged from office long ago.

 

[Crixus]

Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court

The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.

Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.

"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."

John Paul Stevens diddnt have two bouts of cancer either. Ruth don’t need to retire, the reaper coming for her old ass will do. Maybe he can grab her when he comes for John McTumor.

 

[rightwinger]

Robert Bork was treated just like any other nominee. He was given a Senate hearing and a full Senate vote which he lost 58-42

Reagan’s next choice Kennedy was easily accepted

That is how the process works

Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented

Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented

You are incorrect.

Really? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?

Really.

U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789

Show us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyone

View attachment 207722

In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.

View attachment 207724

Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.

Exactly
Those who no action was taken eventually were seated on the court
Are Republicans going to seat Merrick Garland?

 

[rightwinger]

Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court

The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.

Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.

"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."

John Paul Stevens diddnt have two bouts of cancer either. Ruth don’t need to retire, the reaper coming for her old ass will do. Maybe he can grab her when he comes for John McTumor.

Ruth is not 75 lbs overweight with a nasty cheeseburger habit and refuses to exercise

She will dance on Trumps grave

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented

You are incorrect.

Really? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?

Really.

U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789

Show us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyone

View attachment 207722

In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.

View attachment 207724

Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.

Exactly
Those who no action was taken eventually were seated on the court
Are Republicans going to seat Merrick Garland?

Those who no action was taken eventually were seated on the court

You're mistaken.

 

[Crixus]

Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court

The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.

Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.

"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."

John Paul Stevens diddnt have two bouts of cancer either. Ruth don’t need to retire, the reaper coming for her old ass will do. Maybe he can grab her when he comes for John McTumor.

Ruth is not 75 lbs overweight with a nasty cheeseburger habit and refuses to exercise

She will dance on Trumps grave

She is d as hell and has had two bouts with cancer and doesn’t have to use token negro care (a good thing for her). The old bitch will die.

 

[rightwinger]

Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court

The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.

Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.

"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."

John Paul Stevens diddnt have two bouts of cancer either. Ruth don’t need to retire, the reaper coming for her old ass will do. Maybe he can grab her when he comes for John McTumor.

Ruth is not 75 lbs overweight with a nasty cheeseburger habit and refuses to exercise

She will dance on Trumps grave

She is d as hell and has had two bouts with cancer and doesn’t have to use token negro care (a good thing for her). The old bitch will die.

She is a wiry old lady
She will live to 100

Fat Donnie will croak or go to prison

 

[Cellblock2429]

Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated

Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court

The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.

Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.

"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."

/——/ Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg calls in sick again.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will miss next week’s oral arguments, but her recovery from surgery remains “on track,” the Supreme Court said in a statement Friday.

 

[Claudette]

Woman should retire and enjoy the rest of her life.

She's earned it.

 

[sartre play]

Justices should be picked for there knowledge of the law & the constitution. and there ability to render opinion on that basics, not because of there political party.

 

[CrusaderFrank]