She has about a 60% chance to make 90.Ruth Bader Ginsberg just gave Trump the finger
What % of people that reach 85 go on to reach age 90?
Actuarial Life Table
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She has about a 60% chance to make 90.Ruth Bader Ginsberg just gave Trump the finger
What % of people that reach 85 go on to reach age 90?
Interesting. So you have to go back 150 years to find a similar instance and it was during the tenure of one of the two Presidents to go through impeachment proceedings.Show us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyoneReally? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?Robert Bork was treated just like any other nominee. He was given a Senate hearing and a full Senate vote which he lost 58-42
Reagan’s next choice Kennedy was easily accepted
That is how the process works
Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented
Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented
You are incorrect.
Really.
U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789
View attachment 207722
In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.
View attachment 207724
Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.
Interesting. So you have to go back 150 years to find a similar instance and it was during the tenure of one of the two Presidents to go through impeachment proceedings.Show us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyoneReally? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented
You are incorrect.
Really.
U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789
View attachment 207722
In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.
View attachment 207724
Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.
Interesting. So you have to go back 150 years to find a similar instance and it was during the tenure of one of the two Presidents to go through impeachment proceedings.Show us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyoneReally? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented
You are incorrect.
Really.
U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789
View attachment 207722
In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.
View attachment 207724
Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.
I agree but Europe is in FAR better shape than we are. Country after country is electing nationalist governments and they are taking their countries back. Their political systems are different there and since the majority of those countries are still pretty white and free of Jewish propaganda they can and do back their leaders pretty well and give them a free hand in fixing things. America is different between the Jewish owned and controlled media and their pet groups its hard to get much to change here. Hell its even harder when your own party lacks a backbone.I am a bit more radical when it comes to the solution in Europe.Then I don't see a problem. I am just pretty much done trying to sway people to the correct view of things...I am more of a violence and war kind of person...I leave the academic and persuasive writing/talking to others who do it better.That is my goal as well.People are either with me or against me. Matters not to me. My ONLY goal is the survival and advancement of the White race.You are never going to get me to go that far.Indeed. I am not a white nationalist. I am a Racial Loyalist. My ideology is Creativity and Racial Socialism. I am sure you have read Benjamin Klassen's books? That's what I adhere to. I am reading the Racial Loyalist Manifesto right now by Matthew Hale. You should give it a read,its interesting so far and I need to buy his other white White Slavery.
I am not going to try to stop you from doing what you think you need to do for now because your radicalism helps purge the cucks, but you will be opposed by me directly at some point because defeating Western/white decline is all that we need.
If you were smart you would be more pragmatic and help people like me to move the overton window towards your direction.
Merkel should have her head on a pike and those migrant ghettos need to be dusted. Kai Murros has the right idea over there.
Go ahead and let you anti white hatred shine...we all know you hate White people...even if you are white its not a surprise there are lots of mentally ill disloyal scum like you who hate being white.That is my goal as well.People are either with me or against me. Matters not to me. My ONLY goal is the survival and advancement of the White race.You are never going to get me to go that far.Indeed. I am not a white nationalist. I am a Racial Loyalist. My ideology is Creativity and Racial Socialism. I am sure you have read Benjamin Klassen's books? That's what I adhere to. I am reading the Racial Loyalist Manifesto right now by Matthew Hale. You should give it a read,its interesting so far and I need to buy his other white White Slavery.There are degrees of pro-white activism and white nationalism.
You are extreme even for a white nationalist site.
I am not going to try to stop you from doing what you think you need to do for now because your radicalism helps purge the cucks, but you will be opposed by me directly at some point because defeating Western/white decline is all that we need.
If you were smart you would be more pragmatic and help people like me to move the overton window towards your direction.
My ONLY goal is the survival and advancement of the White race.
No- not a complete outlier with Trump voters.
Go wave your amurican flag,thump your constitution that's done NOTHING to stop the destruction of the very race that FOUNDED this fucking country. Race before anything else. PERIOD.She's a Jewess. She is the ultimate enemy. I care nothing about politics I care about what's best for my race and that old jewish bitch IS NOT good for my race.You're letting politics mean way too much if you actually think that.Retire or Die...either is fine with me. Maybe someone will Scalia her....we can only hope.
Damn, you're one ignorant SOB. Lose the race baiting bullshit already.
.
Maybe you should take your hillbilly ass to school and try learning some real history.
.
I am not disputing she said it, but want to watch the video of her saying it. How old is she? Can someone send a link of the video? Didn't pay attention to most of the thread.Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated
Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court
The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.
Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.
"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."
someone that openly hates the Constitution after the First Amendment should have been dragged from office long ago.Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated
Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court
The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.
Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.
"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."
Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated
Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court
The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.
Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.
"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."
ExactlyShow us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyoneReally? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?Robert Bork was treated just like any other nominee. He was given a Senate hearing and a full Senate vote which he lost 58-42
Reagan’s next choice Kennedy was easily accepted
That is how the process works
Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented
Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented
You are incorrect.
Really.
U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789
View attachment 207722
In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.
View attachment 207724
Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.
Ruth is not 75 lbs overweight with a nasty cheeseburger habit and refuses to exerciseTales of her demise are greatly exaggerated
Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court
The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.
Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.
"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."
John Paul Stevens diddnt have two bouts of cancer either. Ruth don’t need to retire, the reaper coming for her old ass will do. Maybe he can grab her when he comes for John McTumor.
ExactlyShow us another case where a nominee was not considered and the sitting President was denied the right to nominate anyoneReally? When did it happen before Merrick Garland?Denying to even consider a nominee is unprecedented
You are incorrect.
Really.
U.S. Senate: Supreme Court Nominations: present-1789
View attachment 207722
In 10 cases, the Senate took no action.
In other instances, after the Senate stalled, candidates withdrew.
View attachment 207724
Johnson's nomination in 1866 was ignored and no one was seated until 1869.
Those who no action was taken eventually were seated on the court
Are Republicans going to seat Merrick Garland?
Ruth is not 75 lbs overweight with a nasty cheeseburger habit and refuses to exerciseTales of her demise are greatly exaggerated
Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court
The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.
Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.
"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."
John Paul Stevens diddnt have two bouts of cancer either. Ruth don’t need to retire, the reaper coming for her old ass will do. Maybe he can grab her when he comes for John McTumor.
She will dance on Trumps grave
Ruth is not 75 lbs overweight with a nasty cheeseburger habit and refuses to exerciseTales of her demise are greatly exaggerated
Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court
The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.
Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.
"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."
John Paul Stevens diddnt have two bouts of cancer either. Ruth don’t need to retire, the reaper coming for her old ass will do. Maybe he can grab her when he comes for John McTumor.
She will dance on Trumps grave
She is d as hell and has had two bouts with cancer and doesn’t have to use token negro care (a good thing for her). The old bitch will die.
/——/ Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg calls in sick again.Tales of her demise are greatly exaggerated
Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she has 'at least five more years' on Supreme Court
The notorious RBG isn't going anywhere.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Sunday that she intended to stay on the bench for "at least five more years," putting off retirement until after her 90th birthday.
Her reasoning? Well, that's what retired justice John Paul Stevens did.
"I'm now 85," Ginsburg said in New York, according to CNN. "My senior colleague, Justice John Paul Stevens, he stepped down when he was 90, so think I have about at least five more years."