Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Military advisers and generals of the Bundeswehr oppose the supply of heavy weapons to Ukraine, but the "feminist, environmental and pacifist" Green Party pushes through supplies, risking unleashing World War III.
Define sanity.Do you know any sane person takes the lead in any western parliament?
I'm not
So what? Better dead than red.The problem is that the Russians have even more nuclear charges and besides, they have delivery systems, that the US air defense is currently unable to intercept.
No.So I would be more careful.
Go ahead and start a nuclear war with NATO.Keep escalating and you'll find out the hard way.
Piss on Russia. They will die right along with everyone else.Europeans shall 'thank' their good-for-nothing corrupted stupid sexual deviant satanic communist 'politicians' who have did anything to instigate WWIII in Ukraine since 2014.
Who from 95% of trash siting in parliaments and president palaces is more skilled and suitable for offices as cleaning personal in ordinary grocery stores?
Now Europa is going to die and insane scum manufactures new 'sanctions' which Russia is laughing about.
Euro has already lost 20%, food shortages, crime sky rocketing, additional to that Russia asks to welcome their unstoppable nukes.
To survive Europeans shall begin to think for themselves and send their lunatic shit calling 'politicians' to insane asylums.
USA, Russia are laughing, only idiotic Europa is gonna lose both its industry and lives of its citizens.
Russian state TV has brazenly simulated how Vladimir Putin would launch a nuclear strike on three capital cities in Europe, declaring there would be 'no survivors', in response to comments made by the UK's Armed Forces Minister supporting Ukrainian strikes on Russian infrastructure.
Hosts on Channel One's 60 Minutes programme announced the cities of London, Paris and Berlin could be hit within 200 seconds of nuclear missiles being launched, as tensions ramp up amid the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Russian propaganda show simulates nuclear missile strike in London
Hosts on Channel One's 60 Minutes programme announced the cities of London, Paris and Berlin could be hit within 200 seconds of nuclear missiles being launched.www.dailymail.co.uk
That's it exactly! Perfect response.Piss on Russia. They will die right along with everyone else.
Most the time simple is the right way.That's it exactly! Perfect response.
Sometimes I blather on because I don't quite think of the right words to say. Your response nailed it.
And this the only option capitalism left for humanity.So what? Better dead than red.
Actually, under some circumstances Russia can win a nuclear war. What is even more important they think (and it is a part of their official military doctrine), that a victory in a limited nuclear war in Europe is more preferred than a defeat in a conventional regional war.The op is MAD. Pushing Fear and nothing more.
Only a MAD man wants nuclear war. Russia will be just as dead as anyone itvnukes.
Hopefully Putin isnta MAD man. And hopefully the Senile thing in the WH doesnt accidentally hit the red button either.
If either is that stupid then I guess itsbjust human nature to destroy mankind itself.
From the Russian point of view, the USA attacked Russia by their Ukrainian proxy. And in some way, it is true.The US isn't going to attack Russia. Do you want them to gobble up Finland, Poland and Ukraine? Putin is crazy.
From the Russian point of view (and exact definitions of the treaty) it was the USA who violated it.NATO says the same thing. Last I looked NATO is mainly in Europe and Russia violated the mediim range missile agreement.
Trump pulled us from that treaty bevause Putin violated it.
Actually not. The Russian nuclear weapon is much newer and better.We have better weapons. Is nuclear war what you want? I thought you were terrified of Iran.
Actually no. Even in the worst scenarios, the USA can't kill more than 30 millions of the Russians.Don't worry.
If Russia wants war with NATO, America has more than enough nuclear weapons to flatten not only Moscow and Leningrad, but every other Russian city as well.
We'll be able to burn the entire Russian nation right off the face of the planet once and for all.
Even if so - it is better to accept defeat in a local conflict somewhere in Eurasia and wait for another opportunity, than commit murder-sucide just for Chinese profit.So what? Better dead than red.
Only if winning means all of their cities flattened and all of their people killed.Actually, under some circumstances Russia can win a nuclear war.
If Russia nukes a NATO target, we won't give them a limited nuclear war. We will give them total annihilation.What is even more important they think (and it is a part of their official military doctrine), that a victory in a limited nuclear war in Europe is more preferred than a defeat in a conventional regional war.
They are wrong.They believe that the USA don't want all-out large-scale war either, and will prefer defeat in a regional war in Europe to defeat in a all-out nuclear war (will it be mutual devastation or Russian victory), because control over Eastern or even Western Europe is not a question of life and death for the Americans.
The Nazis were killed off in 1945.Russia, fighting ISIS in Middle East and Nazies in Europe should be supported.
War is much more preferable.There are peaceful and democratic ways to heal Ukrainian crisis - like recognition of independence of Southern and Eastern Ukraine.
They do not.But if the Europeans (including Poles, Germans and Finns) prefer the way of ressurection of Nazism, discrimination and genocide of ethnic minorities
No. It is Russia that we should nuke.ok, may be we should nuke them by ourselves.
That's because the Russian point of view is fundamentally based on lies.From the Russian point of view (and exact definitions of the treaty) it was the USA who violated it.
Not likely. But irrelevant regardless. Our nukes are more than capable of erasing Russia.Actually not. The Russian nuclear weapon is much newer and better.
Not if we target those capabilities for eradication.What is even more important - Russia has much better emergency and recuperation capabilities.
Killing 30 million Russians sounds like a nice start.Actually no. Even in the worst scenarios, the USA can't kill more than 30 millions of the Russians.
Not if Russia nukes a NATO country.Even if so - it is better to accept defeat in a local conflict somewhere in Eurasia and wait for another opportunity, than commit murder-sucide just for Chinese profit.
"Better dead than red" is a pro-nuclear-war stance from back in the time when the Soviet Union was Communist.What has "red" got to do with Putin?
If we have to launch the nukes, so be it.And this the only option capitalism left for humanity.
Of course we all know that. Today, that only means "better dead"."Better dead than red" is a pro-nuclear-war stance from back in the time when the Soviet Union was Communist.
----------------------------------------------
If we have to launch the nukes, so be it.
How do you know that?Actually not. The Russian nuclear weapon is much newer and better.
What is even more important - Russia has much better emergency and recuperation capabilities.
I am unsure what you mean by waiting him out.Putin is not immortal. If the alternative to waiting him out is burning down the entire earth, the "choice" is obvious to anyone who is not a total misanthrope.
So be it.Of course we all know that. Today, that only means "better dead".
