Roger Stone's only crime was helping Trump get elected...

[Issa]

...all the rest is bullshit.

That's actually a war against humanity, o say jail his ass in giitmo forever.

 

[bripat9643]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

But you can't really name the laws that he broke before the FBI started questioning him.
His biggest crime was not remembering an email here or there.

Right. I think one of the charges is that he said he sent a text message, but Mueller claims he sent a text and an email. That's the kind of penny anti shit in Mueller's indictment. It takes a professional douchebag to ruin a man's life over stuff like that.

 

[justoffal]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

But you can't really name the laws that he broke before the FBI started questioning him.
His biggest crime was not remembering an email here or there.

It's impossible to NOT LIE to a federal prosecutor who is determined to make you a
liar. Mueller is the cop that smashes out your break lights with his nightstick then gives you a citation for equipment failure.

Jo

 

[justoffal]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

But you can't really name the laws that he broke before the FBI started questioning him.
His biggest crime was not remembering an email here or there.

Right. I think one of the charges is that he said he sent a text message, but Mueller claims he sent a text and an email. That's the kind of penny anti shit in Mueller's indictment. It takes a professional douchebag to ruin a man's life of stuff like that.

Exactly. It also takes complicit judges.

Jo

 

[bripat9643]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

But you can't really name the laws that he broke before the FBI started questioning him.
His biggest crime was not remembering an email here or there.

It's impossible to NOT LIE to a federal prosecutor who is determined to make you a
liar. Mueller is the cop that smashes out your break lights with his nightstick then gives you a citation for equipment failure.

Jo

Here's what you do: tell the prosecutor to talk to your lawyer whenever he asks you a question. You don't have to talk to these douchebags. However, Stone was indicted for lying to Congress. That's a non-crime if there ever was one.

 

[Leo123]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

Because they have 0 to do with Russian 'collusion' which is what Mueller is supposed to be investigating.

 

[bripat9643]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

But you can't really name the laws that he broke before the FBI started questioning him.
His biggest crime was not remembering an email here or there.

Right. I think one of the charges is that he said he sent a text message, but Mueller claims he sent a text and an email. That's the kind of penny anti shit in Mueller's indictment. It takes a professional douchebag to ruin a man's life of stuff like that.

Exactly. It also takes complicit judges.

Jo

Notice that Mueller didn't try to have Stone indicted in FL. That's because he knows Pam Bondi will tell him to take a hike. She won't participate in this witch hunt.

I would like to believe 10 or 20 years from now that even Democrats will look back at this episode in history and hang their heads in shame, but I know it isn't possible for them to experience shame.

 

[Slade3200]

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

The crime wasn't committed by Wikileaks, so it's irrelevant. News outlets like NYT, WAPO and CNN were the recipients of many illegal leaks, but I don't see you calling for these firms to be investigated or their executives arrested.

It’s not irrelevant. A crime is a crime. If you are investigating the crime you start by questioning those involved. That’s how every investigation is conducted. When people lie they get looked into more. This isn’t rocket science.

If somebody gives illegally obtained intel to the WAPO then you can bet that investigators will be looking into people who were in contacted with reporters from WAPO. Do you really not understand how this works?

So it doesn't matter who committed the crime? You wouldn't have a problem with being arrested if your neighbor robbed the liquor store?

You're a moron, of course.

Wikileaks wasn't involved in committing the crime. Furthermore, Mueller hasn't questioned Assange or Wikileaks.

Illegally leaked information definitely was given to WAPO, and Mueller doesn't give a flying ****. He's only targeting associates of Donald Trump.

This is a witch hunt. Do you really not understand how this works?

I would expect to be questioned if my neighbor robbed a liquor store and if I lied while being questioned I’d expect the probe would focus hard on me. If a crime was uncovered during that probe then I’d assume I’d be arrested. I do see how you’d expect anything different to happen in that situation

 

[Leo123]

Notice that Mueller didn't try to have Stone indicted in FL. That's because he knows Pam Bondi will tell him to take a hike. She won't participate in this witch hunt.

I would like to believe 10 or 20 years from now that even Democrats will look back at this episode in history and hang their heads in shame, but I know it isn't possible for them to experience shame.

Mueller, IMO, is trying to build a circumstantial case because he has 0 evidence of Trump/Russia collusion. Also, the more he focuses on Trump, the less the focus will be on the true criminals....Hillary and Mueller himself.

 

[cwise76]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

But you do realize that all the things you accuse him of Hillary had done as well as other Dem officials and you are admitting they comitted crimes, but worse they abused power & comitted treason to cover up those crimes.
You can't have a media & justice hold only one side in check without holding all parties accountable in equal justice of the law.
Irony is the left claims to be champions of seeking equality but then never practice what they preach and only show us the facade is mere pandering. =epic fail.

Jesus Christ you ******* crazy ass SOBs get old. Go away please

 

[Erinwltr]

Holy Baby Jebuz Krist. Another diatribe of bripat calling folks nasty names. Just Funky Orange Slushy 7-11 Slurpees sprayed all over USMB. Troll Feed Trough is here.

 

[Leo123]

I would expect to be questioned if my neighbor robbed a liquor store and if I lied while being questioned I’d expect the probe would focus hard on me. If a crime was uncovered during that probe then I’d assume I’d be arrested. I do see how you’d expect anything different to happen in that situation

Yes but that scenario is not a good comparison. A better comparison would be that you get questioned over and over, make a minor misstatement, and get arrested for 'lying.' No prosecutor would accept that as evidence for an indictment.

 

[Slade3200]

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

Podesta is the cornerstone you ignorant, dope addicted retard. Stop try to ****-up the United States.

I love the United States. Why can’t you simply stay on subject and discuss the substance. Don’t be so emotional. If you think lodesta is the cornerstone and nobody else should be looked at then explain why. Calling me names does nothing. Nobody cares

You ever wore the uniform of this nation?

I did not, but I come from 3 generations of military on my fathers side and have a tremendous amount of respect for our armed forces. Why do you ask?

 

[Slade3200]

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

It’s not imabsurd at all, several Russians have all ready been indicted for their crimes during the election. Get a clue

They have committed no crimes as far as the Russian government is concerned. Their indictments were a Mueller diversion.

Who gives a shot what the Russians are concerned about? We have US laws, of those laws are broken they are crimes. I thought you all were supporters of law and order? How do you not know this stuff?

ROFL! The idea that the US can enforce its laws on foreigners doesn't pass the laugh test. Would you allow Russia to impose some arcane law on U.S. citizens? Of course not. We all know that not even you believes this tripe. Indicting Russians who have never set foot in this country is a joke. I can't believe a judge allowed this. Of course, Mueller is very careful to submit his indictments to Obama appointees who don't give a crap about what the law actually allows.

Are you high or just changing the conversation because you can’t debate the topic at hand? I never said anything about enforcement. I’m talking about crimes, plain and simple. Why are you bringing up enforcement? Has nothing to do with this conversation.

 

[Slade3200]

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

Podesta is the cornerstone you ignorant, dope addicted retard. Stop try to ****-up the United States.

I love the United States. Why can’t you simply stay on subject and discuss the substance. Don’t be so emotional. If you think lodesta is the cornerstone and nobody else should be looked at then explain why. Calling me names does nothing. Nobody cares

If you want to be part of this nation...you damn sure had be willing to lay your life down for her. We are the greatest Republic the world has ever seen. People governing themselves. We are a beacon to the free world. If you live here, and love it, put your ass on the line for it.

Another off topic post. Why can’t you stay on subject?

 

[Slade3200]

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

You'll have to excuse me if I can't explain how to conduct a witch hunt. What an honest man would do is drop the whole thing, but Mueller has no shame. He will continue far beyond any norms of justice or common decency.

I’m not asking how to conduct a witch hunt, I’m asking how you would conduct a proper investigation. But I guess you are dodging because the answer would fall right in line with what Mueller is doing. Wow, you are bad at debating.

 

[charwin95]

Someone needs to explain why Stone TRYING to contact Assange is illegal, but the reporter who interviewed Osama Bin Laden before 9/11 was allowed to wall free.

Bin Laden had already killed US citizens with the bombing of the USS Cole. Assange punished emails.

Blondie. My dear that’s a heck of a big difference.

Stone kissing Wikileaks is to harvest dirt against his own citizen thus invaded our democracy with the help of foreign adversaries.

Reporter that interviewed Osama is to gather information how he operates so it can be used against Osama.

 

[charwin95]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

So you are saying that Mueller raided Stone’s house just for (fun) the heck of it?

 

[grainbely]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Why are you so soft on crime?

 

[charwin95]

Who the **** cares about Roger Stone?

We know Stalinists like you that don't care if people are railroaded and persecuted. That's what makes you a Stalinist.

Shouldn't lie to the FBI. Everyone knows that. Why do you think certain people should be exempt from the law?

He isn't accused of lying to the FBI, moron. He's accused of lying to Congress. However, the following people lied to Congress and haven't been charged with any felonies:

1. Hillary Clinton
2. James Comey
3. John Brennan
4. Jim Clapper
5. Andrew McCabe
6. Peter Strozk
7. Lisa Page
8. Sally Yates
9. Bruce Ohre
10. Rod Rosenstein

You have AG, POTUS, FBI director that are Republicans.
What are they waiting for to get these people investigated?

But you have republicans investigating a Republican POTUS.
Isn’t that odd?

There are total of 7 on going investigation against your messiah right now. That doesn’t even include Mueller.