Roger Stone's only crime was helping Trump get elected...

[Bush92]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Sounds like a hanging offense to me. In the Old West, if you stole a horse, you'd get strung up. He was involved in the theft of an election!!!

You believe that because you're an idiot. Sounds to me like your genes need to be removed from the pool

You believe anything Trump tells you and I'm the idiot?!?!

ROLF! Listen to the moron who believes whatever his filthy party tells him to believe.

Even more Irony....on a roll, my boyo! On a roll!

You will hate it when the roll stops and they don’t have shit on Trump, but instead a whole list of civil liberties violations.

 

[Bush92]

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

It’s not imabsurd at all, several Russians have all ready been indicted for their crimes during the election. Get a clue

violation of civil liberties.

 

[Slade3200]

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

The crime wasn't committed by Wikileaks, so it's irrelevant. News outlets like NYT, WAPO and CNN were the recipients of many illegal leaks, but I don't see you calling for these firms to be investigated or their executives arrested.

It’s not irrelevant. A crime is a crime. If you are investigating the crime you start by questioning those involved. That’s how every investigation is conducted. When people lie they get looked into more. This isn’t rocket science.

If somebody gives illegally obtained intel to the WAPO then you can bet that investigators will be looking into people who were in contacted with reporters from WAPO. Do you really not understand how this works?

 

[Slade3200]

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

 

[Bush92]

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

The crime wasn't committed by Wikileaks, so it's irrelevant. News outlets like NYT, WAPO and CNN were the recipients of many illegal leaks, but I don't see you calling for these firms to be investigated or their executives arrested.

It’s not irrelevant. A crime is a crime. If you are investigating the crime you start by questioning those involved. That’s how every investigation is conducted. When people lie they get looked into more. This isn’t rocket science.

If somebody gives illegally obtained intel to the WAPO then you can bet that investigators will be looking into people who were in contacted with reporters from WAPO. Do you really not understand how this works?

Come on all you Trump supporters don’t stand against the liberal Washington DC establishment...we want Hillary...we don’t win...we come after you ...

 

[Bush92]

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

Podesta is the cornerstone you ignorant, dope addicted retard. Stop try to ****-up the United States.

 

[Slade3200]

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

It’s not imabsurd at all, several Russians have all ready been indicted for their crimes during the election. Get a clue

They have committed no crimes as far as the Russian government is concerned. Their indictments were a Mueller diversion.

Who gives a shit what the Russians are concerned about? We have US laws, of those laws are broken they are crimes. I thought you all were supporters of law and order? How do you not know this stuff?

 

[Bush92]

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

It’s not imabsurd at all, several Russians have all ready been indicted for their crimes during the election. Get a clue

They have committed no crimes as far as the Russian government is concerned. Their indictments were a Mueller diversion.

Who gives a shot what the Russians are concerned about? We have US laws, of those laws are broken they are crimes. I thought you all were supporters of law and order? How do you not know this stuff?

Put down the meth pipe...get some sleep.

 

[Slade3200]

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

The crime wasn't committed by Wikileaks, so it's irrelevant. News outlets like NYT, WAPO and CNN were the recipients of many illegal leaks, but I don't see you calling for these firms to be investigated or their executives arrested.

It’s not irrelevant. A crime is a crime. If you are investigating the crime you start by questioning those involved. That’s how every investigation is conducted. When people lie they get looked into more. This isn’t rocket science.

If somebody gives illegally obtained intel to the WAPO then you can bet that investigators will be looking into people who were in contacted with reporters from WAPO. Do you really not understand how this works?

Come on all you Trump supporters don’t stand against the liberal Washington DC establishment...we want Hillary...we don’t win...we come after you ...

What are you talking about? Stick to the topic, I’m not interested in your random rants.

 

[Bush92]

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

The crime wasn't committed by Wikileaks, so it's irrelevant. News outlets like NYT, WAPO and CNN were the recipients of many illegal leaks, but I don't see you calling for these firms to be investigated or their executives arrested.

It’s not irrelevant. A crime is a crime. If you are investigating the crime you start by questioning those involved. That’s how every investigation is conducted. When people lie they get looked into more. This isn’t rocket science.

If somebody gives illegally obtained intel to the WAPO then you can bet that investigators will be looking into people who were in contacted with reporters from WAPO. Do you really not understand how this works?

Come on all you Trump supporters don’t stand against the liberal Washington DC establishment...we want Hillary...we don’t win...we come after you ...

What are you talking about? Stick to the topic, I’m not interested in your random rants.

It took about 20 seconds to respond...put down the meth pipe. Take a break.

 

[Slade3200]

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

Podesta is the cornerstone you ignorant, dope addicted retard. Stop try to ****-up the United States.

I love the United States. Why can’t you simply stay on subject and discuss the substance. Don’t be so emotional. If you think lodesta is the cornerstone and nobody else should be looked at then explain why. Calling me names does nothing. Nobody cares

 

[bripat9643]

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

The crime wasn't committed by Wikileaks, so it's irrelevant. News outlets like NYT, WAPO and CNN were the recipients of many illegal leaks, but I don't see you calling for these firms to be investigated or their executives arrested.

It’s not irrelevant. A crime is a crime. If you are investigating the crime you start by questioning those involved. That’s how every investigation is conducted. When people lie they get looked into more. This isn’t rocket science.

If somebody gives illegally obtained intel to the WAPO then you can bet that investigators will be looking into people who were in contacted with reporters from WAPO. Do you really not understand how this works?

So it doesn't matter who committed the crime? You wouldn't have a problem with being arrested if your neighbor robbed the liquor store?

You're a moron, of course.

Wikileaks wasn't involved in committing the crime. Furthermore, Mueller hasn't questioned Assange or Wikileaks.

Illegally leaked information definitely was given to WAPO, and Mueller doesn't give a flying ****. He's only targeting associates of Donald Trump.

This is a witch hunt. Do you really not understand how this works?

 

[Bush92]

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

Podesta is the cornerstone you ignorant, dope addicted retard. Stop try to ****-up the United States.

I love the United States. Why can’t you simply stay on subject and discuss the substance. Don’t be so emotional. If you think lodesta is the cornerstone and nobody else should be looked at then explain why. Calling me names does nothing. Nobody cares

I love the United States...supported her my whole life. Drop the pipe.

 

[Bush92]

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

Podesta is the cornerstone you ignorant, dope addicted retard. Stop try to ****-up the United States.

I love the United States. Why can’t you simply stay on subject and discuss the substance. Don’t be so emotional. If you think lodesta is the cornerstone and nobody else should be looked at then explain why. Calling me names does nothing. Nobody cares

You ever wore the uniform of this nation?

 

[bripat9643]

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

It’s not imabsurd at all, several Russians have all ready been indicted for their crimes during the election. Get a clue

They have committed no crimes as far as the Russian government is concerned. Their indictments were a Mueller diversion.

Who gives a shot what the Russians are concerned about? We have US laws, of those laws are broken they are crimes. I thought you all were supporters of law and order? How do you not know this stuff?

ROFL! The idea that the US can enforce its laws on foreigners doesn't pass the laugh test. Would you allow Russia to impose some arcane law on U.S. citizens? Of course not. We all know that not even you believes this tripe. Indicting Russians who have never set foot in this country is a joke. I can't believe a judge allowed this. Of course, Mueller is very careful to submit his indictments to Obama appointees who don't give a crap about what the law actually allows.

 

[Bush92]

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

Podesta is the cornerstone you ignorant, dope addicted retard. Stop try to ****-up the United States.

I love the United States. Why can’t you simply stay on subject and discuss the substance. Don’t be so emotional. If you think lodesta is the cornerstone and nobody else should be looked at then explain why. Calling me names does nothing. Nobody cares

If you want to be part of this nation...you damn sure had be willing to lay your life down for her. We are the greatest Republic the world has ever seen. People governing themselves. We are a beacon to the free world. If you live here, and love it, put your ass on the line for it.

 

[bripat9643]

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

You'll have to excuse me if I can't explain how to conduct a witch hunt. What an honest man would do is drop the whole thing, but Mueller has no shame. He will continue far beyond any norms of justice or common decency.

 

[justoffal]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Yep....exactly.... They are going after his election team hoping to cripple his 2020 effort.

Jo

 

[justoffal]

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

Who do you think committed the crime when it comes to hacking the DNC and Russian interference in the election? If you don’t know who, then how would you go about finding out who was associated and responsible? Come on dazzle us with your brilliant plan

You'll have to excuse me if I can't explain how to conduct a witch hunt. What an honest man would do is drop the whole thing, but Mueller has no shame. He will continue far beyond any norms of justice or common decency.

Don't forget.... The moment he closes down the paychecks end. Why would he hurry?

Jo

 

[mudwhistle]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

But you can't really name the laws that he broke before the FBI started questioning him.
His biggest crime was not remembering an email here or there.