Roger Stone's only crime was helping Trump get elected...

[bodecea]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

We dont know yet. Thats why they were arrested for lying. Mueller evidently knows. Ask him.

In other words, you have no facts. You're just a brainwashed Mueller sycophant.

I must say, you've been on quite an Irony run for the last week....

 

[bripat9643]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

We dont know yet. Thats why they were arrested for lying. Mueller evidently knows. Ask him.

In other words, you have no facts. You're just a brainwashed Mueller sycophant.

I must say, you've been on quite an Irony run for the last week....

That must be your substitute for wit.

 

[Slade3200]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

He broke no laws before he was interrogated by the FBI and Congress. However, Hillary, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Brennan and Clapper all committed the same crime.

No they didn’t, you are lying. But at least you are semi admitting that Stone broke laws. That’s a start

they recorded on video lying, moron.

That’s apples and oranges. I’m not going to waste my time trying to explain the difference. It’s obvious. You are either spinning or you don’t know what the hell you are talking about. Either way, that’s your problem

 

[Slade3200]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

He broke no laws before he was interrogated by the FBI and Congress. However, Hillary, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Brennan and Clapper all committed the same crime.

No they didn’t, you are lying. But at least you are semi admitting that Stone broke laws. That’s a start

No, I haven't admitted that. You need to read more carefully.

You said he broke no laws before he was interrogated. How about after? Did he break any laws?

 

[Slade3200]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

 

[bripat9643]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

He broke no laws before he was interrogated by the FBI and Congress. However, Hillary, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Brennan and Clapper all committed the same crime.

No they didn’t, you are lying. But at least you are semi admitting that Stone broke laws. That’s a start

they recorded on video lying, moron.

That’s apples and oranges. I’m not going to waste my time trying to explain the difference. It’s obvious. You are either spinning or you don’t know what the hell you are talking about. Either way, that’s your problem

You aren't going to explain the difference because there is no difference. Hillary lied to Congress. End of story.

 

[Slade3200]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

So you're admitting this is an open ended general investigation. It's simply the left hoping they can find something to pin on trump.

That's fine, however, we need to do this for every presidential, Senate, and house member. Tha would be the right way to do it.


Next time a Democrat wins the presidency, well see if numerous open ended investigations ensue for the duration of their presidency..

I think they started by investigation election interference and the many crimes associated with that. Then as they questioned and dug deeper they found Trump people lying over and over again which is why many of them are in hot water. They have been very tight lipped so who knows what else they are sitting on. You are repeating tired talking points that don’t align with reality, do yourself a favor and stop doing that

 

[bripat9643]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Stone is going to walk

 

[Slade3200]

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

He broke no laws before he was interrogated by the FBI and Congress. However, Hillary, McCabe, Strozk, Page, Brennan and Clapper all committed the same crime.

No they didn’t, you are lying. But at least you are semi admitting that Stone broke laws. That’s a start

they recorded on video lying, moron.

That’s apples and oranges. I’m not going to waste my time trying to explain the difference. It’s obvious. You are either spinning or you don’t know what the hell you are talking about. Either way, that’s your problem

You aren't going to explain the difference because there is no difference. Hillary liked to Congress. End of story.

Go ahead and keep believing the situations are the same. I bet you really believe that the devils triangle is a drinking game and boof means fart. Should Kav be in jail as well?

 

[Slade3200]

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

It’s not imabsurd at all, several Russians have all ready been indicted for their crimes during the election. Get a clue

 

[bodecea]

Who the **** cares about Roger Stone?

We know Stalinists like you that don't care if people are railroaded and persecuted. That's what makes you a Stalinist.

Shouldn't lie to the FBI. Everyone knows that. Why do you think certain people should be exempt from the law?

He isn't accused of lying to the FBI, moron. He's accused of lying to Congress. However, the following people lied to Congress and haven't been charged with any felonies:

1. Hillary Clinton
2. James Comey
3. John Brennan
4. Jim Clapper
5. Andrew McCabe
6. Peter Strozk
7. Lisa Page
8. Sally Yates
9. Bruce Ohre
10. Rod Rosenstein

Why?

 

[Slade3200]

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

 

[bripat9643]

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

The crime wasn't committed by Wikileaks, so it's irrelevant. News outlets like NYT, WAPO and CNN were the recipients of many illegal leaks, but I don't see you calling for these firms to be investigated or their executives arrested.

 

[bripat9643]

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

I agree that Wikileaks committed no crime and shouldn't be the subject of Mueller's witch hunt.

 

[bripat9643]

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

It’s not imabsurd at all, several Russians have all ready been indicted for their crimes during the election. Get a clue

They have committed no crimes as far as the Russian government is concerned. Their indictments were a Mueller diversion.

 

[Lysistrata]

...all the rest is bullshit.

How does Blackrook know anything at all about Roger Stone? How does anyone on this thread know about Adam Schiff or Hillary Clinton? Is anyone here close enough to this stuff to actually know what is going on?

Another USMB Saturday afternoon creative writing class.

 

[Erinwltr]

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

Even Mueller doesn't believe anyone in the Trump campaign "conspired" with Wikileaks.

At this point we have no evidence that Stone broke any laws. Stone shouldn't even have been interrogated by Mueller because talking to Wikileaks is not a crime. Why should Mueller be investigating non-crimes?

The Russians committed crimes against our country. Wikileaks published stolen emails which were obtained through criminal acts. So speaking with people who were in contact with Wikileaks is natural in the course of investigating those crimes. That’s common sense. Then when people who are questioned lie and lie and lie, they go deeper down the rabbit hole.

Russians aren't subject to U.S. law, so your first claim is absurd. Wikileaks committed no crimes, so your second claim is also ridiculous. Whether it's "common sense" to investigate people who contacted Wiklileaks, the point is that it's not a proper subject of Mueller's so-called investigation. It's only "common sense" if you endorse witch hunts.

If emails were stolen and given to Wikileaks the there is a crime. Agreed?

bripat won't agree to anything. He only yells, slings shit, calls folks play ground infantile names, and pissez in his panty hoze. Just like the Caving POTUS.

 

[bodecea]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Sounds like a hanging offense to me. In the Old West, if you stole a horse, you'd get strung up. He was involved in the theft of an election!!!

You believe that because you're an idiot. Sounds to me like your genes need to be removed from the pool

You believe anything Trump tells you and I'm the idiot?!?!

ROLF! Listen to the moron who believes whatever his filthy party tells him to believe.

Even more Irony....on a roll, my boyo! On a roll!

 

[Erinwltr]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Sounds like a hanging offense to me. In the Old West, if you stole a horse, you'd get strung up. He was involved in the theft of an election!!!

You believe that because you're an idiot. Sounds to me like your genes need to be removed from the pool

You believe anything Trump tells you and I'm the idiot?!?!

ROLF! Listen to the moron who believes whatever his filthy party tells him to believe.

Even more Irony....on a roll, my boyo! On a roll!

Agreed. He must be on his second gallon plastic bottle of cheap, nasty gin. Roll, bripat, roll!