TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
So you admit that you have no argument? That you are not up to the task of countering what I am saying? You are making yourself look like the fool. You are the foolLol
Why would i engage with a fool like you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So you admit that you have no argument? That you are not up to the task of countering what I am saying? You are making yourself look like the fool. You are the foolLol
Why would i engage with a fool like you.
I admit nothing but you are a waste of my timeSo you admit that you have no argument? That you are not up to the task of countering what I am saying? You are making yourself look like the fool. You are the fool
No no. You obviously need an education. Urgently. Your ignorance is astounding. But in addition, you are a loathsome piece of shit.That is quite an unhinged moronic rant kid. The last thing that I need is for you to educate me. I had my say about Aliti and your Lord Hale. They are both. despicable excuses for human beings as are you. It is all well documented. You are just throwing shit at the wall hoping something will slick. You can't gaslight me. I know what I know and I am confident in my beliefs, so just fuck off sonny boy
Why would anybody have a discussion with a sexual pervert such as yourself?So you admit that you have no argument? That you are not up to the task of countering what I am saying? You are making yourself look like the fool. You are the fool
Says the juvenile delinquent who keeps telling me to go fuck myself. Yiu are a sick joke without a punch lineYour lack of intelligence, sophistication, maturity
You do not have to admit anything. Your lack of a valid counter argument speaks volumes about your failureI admit nothing but you are a waste of my time
Gish Gallop !'No no. You obviously need an education. Urgently. Your ignorance is astounding. But in addition, you are a loathsome piece of shit.
As for throwing shit, stop projecting. You are the one doing that by noting that the draft Alito decision does cite some historical Hale decisions and intentionally conflating that with his agreement for anything said by Hale. I realize that you’re a liar. I also see that you’re ignorant and rather plodding. But the purpose for the citation to the historical antecedents was obviously for a very different juridical purpose.
Maybe get an adult to help you with those “word” things. I fear you are beyond any help in your shitty lack of honesty.
I’m not even middle aged anymore. And your opinion of my maturity means so little coming from a worthless troll hypocrite piece of shit like you. So, ya know. There’s that.Says the juvenile delinquent who keeps telling me to go fuck myself. Yiu are a sick joke without a punch line
I’m not even middle aged anymore.I’m not even middle aged anymore. And your opinion of my maturity means so little coming from a worthless troll hypocrite piece of shit like you. So, ya know. There’s that.
You still can’t defend you own point. We know why. You’re quite stupid and a determined dishonest propagandist.
Correct, they are mixing apple's and oranges, but the two don't go together. They do this to skirt the law, but the law is supposed to be keen on them doing this, and they should be getting hauled into jail for pulling the crap they keep pulling.Yup. Same reason one is allowed to yell “fire” in a movie theater. Free speech doesn’t extend to everything, in every circumstance.
States have the right to make the laws for the residents of their states. That’s how it works.
You just can't figure that out?In most states (including California), when a pregnant woman is murdered, the killer is charged with a double murder. However, when a woman wants to kill her baby by abortion, it's just a blob of flesh. Something doesn't smell right here.
You just can't figure that out?
More so than the federal government.So you think a state govt. has some right to legalize the murder of babies.
I've already said several times I take the liberal view on abortions, i.e. in cases of rape, incest, and medical threats to the mother's life. This is not the same thng as murdering babies for the petty bourgeois crime of Inconvenience.More so than the federal government.
But I‘m on your side. There is no way that we could ever get a national ban on abortion, so isn’t it better that instead of a federal law that FORCES all states to allow abortion, that we return the decision to the individuals in each state, and thus at least get some decent laws in half of them?
You are arguing to ban all abortions. That would never happen. The best we can hope for is to remove the edict that prohibits such a ban nationwide.
But what are you going to do? The unfortunate fact is that we live in a country where about half the states are OK with a woman murdering her unborn child. At least when the SCOTUS lifts the ban that forces all states to allow these murders, the other half will at least show some compassion for a defenseless and innocent life. It’s better than what we have now.I've already said several times I take the liberal view on abortions, i.e. in cases of rape, incest, and medical threats to the mother's life. This is not the same thng as murdering babies for the petty bourgeois crime of Inconvenience.
Yes, given the fact that most Americans still approve of the compromise ruling of 50 years ago that has applied as established law since then, stare decisis is the conservative legal principle that pertains.... 50 year's ago the ruling was correct
Throughout the debate, those opposed to abortion have shown a blatant hostility towards women and a callous disregard for their well being. I think that Alito, in his leaked opinion, said something about access to abortion- which has allowed women to plan families and pursue careers is not longer necessary because they have come so far. Yes they have, but is that a reason to revert to the barefoot and pregnant mentality?