Blisterfinger
Platinum Member
- May 15, 2021
- 14,220
- 6,525
- 938
Your dog has no rights specified in the Constitution. It is morally reprehensible if I killed it however. You are truly a vicious person
Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!
- Thread starter BackAgain
- Start date
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
Blisterfinger said: Your dog has no rights specified in the Constitution. It is morally reprehensible if I killed it however. You are truly a vicious person. blstrfngrr 240909 Vrvwgo12681
My daughter had her first baby 14 months ago. She could’ve died two weeks before the baby was due. About two weeks before the due date my granddaughter had turned about halfway so she was sideways and very active and she caused the water to break at 3 AM in the morning. Fortunately, they live seven minutes from one of the best rated maternity hospitals in the country. When they arrived they were told they had about an hour or two to take my granddaughter out cesarean. However, at the same time, another woman arrived with an even worse potentially fatal condition and they decided to take her first. A then another surgical team got there within 15 or 20 minutes.
I’m telling you this because Saint_Heynorm and you are the most vicious and repugnant male human beings writing bullshit here because you both think it’s morally OK for a boyfriend to kidnap his girlfriend and force her to give birth while locked up in his basement or garage or someplace where she would have to give birth on her own,
You two are sick.
daveman
Diamond Member
Let's see, stamping your feet doesn't seem to be working...I know! Maybe if you threaten to hold your breath until you turn blue! Yeah, that's bound to work!
daveman
Diamond Member
Would somebody PLEASE tell NotfooledbyW he's the smartest guy in the room? That's all he wants to hear.
I would but I don't like to lie.
I would but I don't like to lie.
You know as well as I know, he would be let go as he did what was needed to save his child from another who was threatening to kill it.
And, he could show proof that he was acting in the best interest of the child.
Your bullshit stories are nothing more than that,
It's in the hands ofveach states voters. That is a greaaaaaaaaast thing. Nobody can lose.You know as well as I know, he would be let go as he did what was needed to save his child from another who was threatening to kill it.
And, he could show proof that he was acting in the best interest of the child.
Your bullshit stories are nothing more than that,
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
Does this girlfriend have parents sisters brothers friends, co-workers Will be wondering why their loved ones suddenly disappeared with a boyfriend who is acting very strange.
And when she came back, with a baby that would have otherwise been killed. They’d call him a hero, as would the girlfriend.
………….
And least we forget, here’s the hypothetical that had notfooledbyW all worked up.
I’ve heard this hypothetical before. Thoughts?
A man finds out his girlfriend is pregnant and has made an appointment to terminate the pregnancy.
He confronts her, telling her that he will support or raise the child and begs her not to abort it.
She confirms she is pregnant and that she is planning on terminating the pregnancy regardless of his pleading.
He kidnaps her and holds her against her will until the baby is born. The baby and mother are both healthy.
He returns the mother and child and turns himself in.
He is charged with the kidnapping but pleads innocent as he was only protecting his child.
Last edited:
daveman
Diamond Member
Death cultists can't understand why anyone would value a clump of cells. Human life means nothing to them.
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
women in Georgia can, for now, terminate unwanted and/or dangerous pregnancies up to 22 weeks.
nfbw 241001 Vdpxyz00174
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/30/politics/georgia-abortion-ban/index.html
McBurney wrote, “a review of our higher courts’ interpretations of ‘liberty’ demonstrates that liberty in Georgia includes in its meaning, in its protections, and in its bundle of rights the power of a woman to control her own body, to decide what happens to it and in it, and to reject state interference with her healthcare choices.”
nfbw 241001 Vdpxyz00174
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/30/politics/georgia-abortion-ban/index.html
McBurney wrote, “a review of our higher courts’ interpretations of ‘liberty’ demonstrates that liberty in Georgia includes in its meaning, in its protections, and in its bundle of rights the power of a woman to control her own body, to decide what happens to it and in it, and to reject state interference with her healthcare choices.”
So don’t try to help female overdose victims. You’d be interfering with her “choice”. And that’s naughty.
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
A woman who is capable of doing that obviously has reached a stage of development beyond 22 weeks in the warm and was successful in being born.
Why are you so confused about that?
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
“When a fetus growing inside a woman reaches viability, when society can assume care and responsibility for that separate life, then – and only then – may society intervene. An arbitrary six-week ban on (post-embryonic cardiac activity pregnancy) terminations is inconsistent with these rights and the proper balance that a viability rule establishes between a woman’s rights of liberty and privacy and society’s interest in protecting and caring for unborn infants,” McBurney wrote.
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
skews13 inserts quote by a true liberty respecting judge: “Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote," Judge Robert McBurney.
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
nfbw 241001 Vrvwgo12696
iii. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 230127 {post•6929}
HeyNorm Jan’23 Srvwg: So, the newborn gains rights at birth, hynrm 230127 Srvwgo06929
NotfooledbyW Oct’24 Vrvwgo: A fetus has rights through the individual personhood rights of its potential birthmother. Those fetal rights never ever supersede the right to privacy and bodily autonomy if it’s a potential mother.
The following quote is an indictment of the six Catholics on the US Supreme Court’s unconstitutionally and dishonestly rendered a decision that deprive women of their rights for the sake of gratifying, a super religious electorate in some states.
skews13 inserts quote by a true liberty respecting judge: “Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote," Judge Robert McBurney.
nfbw 241001 Vrvwgo12696
Another unintelligible comment by adv033 Saint Backagain.
iii. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 230127 {post•6929}
HeyNorm Jan’23 Srvwg: So, the newborn gains rights at birth, hynrm 230127 Srvwgo06929
NotfooledbyW Oct’24 Vrvwgo: A fetus has rights through the individual personhood rights of its potential birthmother. Those fetal rights never ever supersede the right to privacy and bodily autonomy if it’s a potential mother.
The following quote is an indictment of the six Catholics on the US Supreme Court’s unconstitutionally and dishonestly rendered a decision that deprive women of their rights for the sake of gratifying, a super religious electorate in some states.
skews13 inserts quote by a true liberty respecting judge: “Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote," Judge Robert McBurney.
nfbw 241001 Vrvwgo12696
Last edited:
Everyone has a right to make bad decisions. The honorable live with them and don’t harm others because of those decisions.
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
When a woman decides to terminate her own pregnancy, she’s is not harming others.
What she decides to do with what’s happening inside her body is none of your fucking business.
whutTHEYsay
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 28,262
- 6,107
- 245
I am still waiting for Saint Backagain to say something intelligent in response to the very intelligent paragraphs written below:FooledByKamalalala, the above quoted moron, thinks a yawn emoticon is “unintelligible.”
skews13 inserts quote by a true liberty respecting judge: “Women are not some piece of collectively owned community property the disposition of which is decided by majority vote," Judge Robert McBurney.
“When a fetus growing inside a woman reaches viability, when society can assume care and responsibility for that separate life, then – and only then – may society intervene. An arbitrary six-week ban on (post-embryonic cardiac activity pregnancy) terminations is inconsistent with these rights and the proper balance that a viability rule establishes between a woman’s rights of liberty and privacy and society’s interest in protecting and caring for unborn infants,” McBurney wrote
Similar threads
