Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

The common law grew with the times.
NFBW: Our legal system is based on long centuries based established jurisprudence with emphasis on consistency and precedence. On abortion It’s the opposite of changing with the times and modern science which is a figment of your imagination anyway. There is no science that settles when legal personhood begins.

END2303282124
 
NFBW: What is “progression of the abortion system and it’s processes in which were changing big time”


A person (pl: people) is a being that has certain capacities or attributes such as reason, morality, consciousness or self-consciousness, and being a part of a culturally established form of social relations such as kinship, ownership of property, or legal responsibility.[1][2][3][4] The defining features of personhood and, consequently, what makes a person count as a person, differ widely among cultures and contexts.[5][6]

In addition to the question of personhood, of what makes a being count as a person to begin with, there are further questions about personal identity and self: both about what makes any particular person that particular person instead of another, and about what makes a person at one time the same person as they were or will be at another time despite any intervening changes.

The plural form "people" is often used to refer to an entire nation or ethnic group (as in "a people"), and this was the original meaning of the word; it subsequently acquired its use as a plural form of person. The plural form "persons" is often used in philosophical and legal writing.

NFBW: a living human organism cannot be a “person” in the legal sense conscious of self if it dies not have a brain.

END2303282058
Once a baby is named, and a pregnancy is excepted by the mother upon finding out she is with child, then that baby is by the mother "assigned" personhood wherefore the mother willingly allows herself to protect, nourish, and have her child fully develope within her womb.

Where it all gets very complicated is when you have a very emotional confused women getting pregnant, and then deciding that she doesn't want to be pregnant after the fact (for whatever reason), and so IMO where the state goes wrong, is that it somehow allows or enables her to seek out an abortion in a place that welcomes that woman for either profits or just cold hearted aid to destroy her pregnancy that is justified by those profits...... This profiting happens instead of having any compassion for mother or her unborn child now developing in her womb. Once the baby killing industrial complex was formed, and the profits began to roll, then it all started sucking in the government, and the taxpayer's either in some cases directly or indirectly causing people to become unknown accomplices to the tragic decision making of an emotional woman who is attempting to use abortion as a form of birth control.

The government gracefully bowing out was the correct thing to do in the case, now it's up to the state's to either be part of it or bow out also. If they all bow out, then the only way forward is for women and men to use contraception, and to preplan the female pregnancy together.

The killing for profit needs to end, because it got out of control just like many knew that it would. The results or stats just kept getting higher and higher, and the trending/brainwashing just kept getting heavier and heavier or thicker and thicker.
 
NFBW: Our legal system is based on long centuries based established jurisprudence with emphasis on consistency and precedence. On abortion It’s the opposite of changing with the times and modern science which is a figment of your imagination anyway. There is no science that settles when legal personhood begins.

END2303282124
No science that settles where legal personhood begins... Correct, so your idea of a timeline is as ridiculous as it can be.
 
NFBW: Our legal system is based on long centuries based established jurisprudence with emphasis on consistency and precedence. On abortion It’s the opposite of changing with the times and modern science which is a figment of your imagination anyway. There is no science that settles when legal personhood begins.

END2303282124
Zzz
 
You keep trying to make this about religion. It isn’t.
NFBW: This thread you started exists only because of religion, white grievance and Christian grievance united into the Republican Party. Nothing more.

NFBW220725-#3,864
SCIENTISTS PROVE SATAN’S ARMY HAS INVADED AMERICA - so white Christian male LAWMAKERS can force birth on all women and girls in Jesus’ states to defeat Satan and his army - - - Just ask Lt Colonel beagle9 in ding ‘s unemotional HOLY unChristianChristian scientific TRUTH CRUSADE for government control of every female reproductive organ in Jesus’ Christian Nation.

ding200124-#518 “America is still a Christian nation even if all of its people don’t behave in a Christian manner.

They just need a little more suffering before returning to successful ways. Like I said before atheism and secular humanism has only infected America, it hasn’t taken over.

ding220724-#3,855 I don't consider souls or original sin or anything else. Those are religious beliefs and have nothing to do with establishing rights.”

NFBW2207241200-#3,856 “So what gives you the right @ding to unilaterally insist that your “belief” must be the only one accepted and pushed by elected lawmakers

JoeB131 strollingbones

beagle9220529-#2,385 ... If that sign "In God we trust" hanging there on that wall were to be put into the classroom's along with Christ teaching's and our prayers again, then we wouldn't be where we are today in America

beagle9220529-#2,389 “American use to stand for something, and that included standing up for God, and believing in Christ for the majority, but then came the author of confusion with his minion's or disciple's to sit down on it all, and I must say that if allowed he can truly cause us pain like we've done never imagined before. Your denial is causing great anarchy and chaos if you attempt to ignore the truth, and choose yourself to be a disciple of the evil one's army.

ding220724-#3,857 “Because it's just science. It's not emotion.”

NFBW220725-#3,864 Do you believe it is random chance and mere coincidence ding that the lawmakers who get politically elected in every state where abortion is being banned, as you wish, would hold a majority of the beagle9 religious belief that Americans need to believe that Jesus Christ is their Lord and Savior and vote Republicans or else Satan and liberals will take it all away.

NFBW220725-#3,864 Do you really believe ding that religious political hacks, mostly white Christian males, are the one’s who should be imposing their religious perspective on women and young girls who get pregnant and find out white Christian men are deciding what they can and cannot do with their body and health?

END2303290044
 
NFBW: This thread you started exists only because of religion, white grievance and Christian grievance united into the Republican Party. Nothing more.

NFBW220725-#3,864
SCIENTISTS PROVE SATAN’S ARMY HAS INVADED AMERICA - so white Christian male LAWMAKERS can force birth on all women and girls in Jesus’ states to defeat Satan and his army - - - Just ask Lt Colonel beagle9 in ding ‘s unemotional HOLY unChristianChristian scientific TRUTH CRUSADE for government control of every female reproductive organ in Jesus’ Christian Nation.

ding200124-#518 “America is still a Christian nation even if all of its people don’t behave in a Christian manner.

They just need a little more suffering before returning to successful ways. Like I said before atheism and secular humanism has only infected America, it hasn’t taken over.

ding220724-#3,855 I don't consider souls or original sin or anything else. Those are religious beliefs and have nothing to do with establishing rights.”

NFBW2207241200-#3,856 “So what gives you the right @ding to unilaterally insist that your “belief” must be the only one accepted and pushed by elected lawmakers

JoeB131 strollingbones

beagle9220529-#2,385 ... If that sign "In God we trust" hanging there on that wall were to be put into the classroom's along with Christ teaching's and our prayers again, then we wouldn't be where we are today in America

beagle9220529-#2,389 “American use to stand for something, and that included standing up for God, and believing in Christ for the majority, but then came the author of confusion with his minion's or disciple's to sit down on it all, and I must say that if allowed he can truly cause us pain like we've done never imagined before. Your denial is causing great anarchy and chaos if you attempt to ignore the truth, and choose yourself to be a disciple of the evil one's army.

ding220724-#3,857 “Because it's just science. It's not emotion.”

NFBW220725-#3,864 Do you believe it is random chance and mere coincidence ding that the lawmakers who get politically elected in every state where abortion is being banned, as you wish, would hold a majority of the beagle9 religious belief that Americans need to believe that Jesus Christ is their Lord and Savior and vote Republicans or else Satan and liberals will take it all away.

NFBW220725-#3,864 Do you really believe ding that religious political hacks, mostly white Christian males, are the one’s who should be imposing their religious perspective on women and young girls who get pregnant and find out white Christian men are deciding what they can and cannot do with their body and health?

END2303290044
Not having any discussion with you about religion. That’s apparently your bag.
 
Not having any discussion with you about religion.
Of course not. You are having a monologue with yourself based on the religious right anti freedom campaign propaganda against pregnant women in which you claim to be fighting for unborn life. Does imaginary fighting for life give meaning to your life?

it’s a con.
 
Of course not. You are having a monologue with yourself based on the religious right anti freedom campaign propaganda against pregnant women in which you claim to be fighting for unborn life. Does imaginary fighting for life give meaning to your life?

it’s a con.
Nope. I’ve patiently tried to get a hint of honesty out of you, but alas, you’re just not a straight speaker.
 
Not having any discussion with you about religion
NFBW: Do you have the intellectual capability to have a discussion about abortion as a matter of conscience?

(1) Human Life is sacred and should always be protected from the moment of conception for it is a creation of God as defined by revealed religions found mostly in Western Civilization.

(2) Human life requires consciousness and therefore a human mind. Nature has provided a moral way out for women in a condition of unwanted pregnancy. It takes 22 weeks for a fetus to develop a brain of its own. The choice to self induce an abortion during the first 22 weeks of pregnancy is not a humanistic idealistic decision without consequences, but it must be an acceptable and permitted decision by every humanely ordered and well meaning established society that is grounded in reason, law science, liberty and equal justice for all.

Why in America BackAgain ding CarsomyrPlusSix can a person who chooses to believe in (1) a revealed religion or any traditional belief system of morality such as Hinduism be permitted to tell a believer in (2) that he or she cannot believe in (2) any or similar matter of conscience such as that?

END2303290546
 
BigBendTx220518-#480 ¥ Big Bend Texas ¥ “Religion is irrelevant, life is life”

NFBW220518-#551 to: -52 “Two things that are different cannot be the same {in} science. A human Zygot is not a living breathing human like its mother

BBT220518-#561 to: -10 ¥ Big Bend Texas ¥ “A newborn isn't as fully developed as the mother either.”

NFBW: A newborn is alive because he or she has become an independent person with his or her very own unique DNA identifiable brain.

NFBW: The expression “life is life” is not a scientific argument to justify banning legal abirtion during the first 22 weeks of pregnancy, it is a plea from a Catholic Church perspective that all human life is sacred because it is created at conception to have a personal relationship with God.

END2303291045
 
  • Pregnancy: Many of today’s abortion discussions fail to examine the physical reality of a pregnant woman. Bearing a child for nine months is no simple feat one just endures. A developing child literally absorbs nutrients from a woman’s body causing muscle depletion, brittle bones, tooth decay, ligament loosening, possible reflux, sleep deprivation, dramatic hormone changes, and more.
  • A Humanist Take on Abortion - Being Human Church
  • Even today, delivery is dangerous with the U.S. leading industrialized countries for maternal deaths. This suffering is something both mothers and those thinking about abortion policy must consider.
NFBW: So how is it possible in modern society that pregnant women can be protected from harm in one state, but not protected from harm in another, all at the whim of the voters?
 
NFBW: Slavery is not a private matter.

Redfish230325-#337 ¥ Redfish ¥ “so prior to 24 weeks it is not a human being? not a creation of God? has zero rights? is something that can just be discarded like an empty coke can?

NFBW: why are there so many white Republican Christians in a secular groupthink of all beliefs and ideologies insisting on forcing your conscience on every member of society over the survival of a never-had a functional-brain fetuses?

END2303261137
your views and opinions (and that's all they are) are in the minority. That's why you think you have to scream all the time.
 
BigBendTx220518-#480 ¥ Big Bend Texas ¥ “Religion is irrelevant, life is life”

NFBW220518-#551 to: -52 “Two things that are different cannot be the same {in} science. A human Zygot is not a living breathing human like its mother

BBT220518-#561 to: -10 ¥ Big Bend Texas ¥ “A newborn isn't as fully developed as the mother either.”

NFBW: A newborn is alive because he or she has become an independent person with his or her very own unique DNA identifiable brain.

NFBW: The expression “life is life” is not a scientific argument to justify banning legal abirtion during the first 22 weeks of pregnancy, it is a plea from a Catholic Church perspective that all human life is sacred because it is created at conception to have a personal relationship with God.

END2303291045
those are your opinions, not biological facts. WTF can't you understand that?
 

Forum List

Back
Top