Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[beagle9]

NFBW: I don’t think Dobbs did that. They can’t because the Constitution won’t allow it because personhood does not start a conception as the Catholics on the court have been brainwashed to believes

Meanwhile CarsomyrPlusSix do you hope an actual “baby killer” becomes a Republican Senator from Georgia instead of a good man who has not knocked a girlfriend up and paid her to terminate it?

Trump-endorsed candidate Herschel Walker has staked out his position as a no-compromise anti-abortion candidate in his run against incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock.​

​

However, The Daily Beast is now reportingthat Walker once paid for an abortion for a former girlfriend, who literally kept the receipts for it and is now sharing them with reporters.​

​

Herschel Walker paid for a girlfriend's abortion -- and she kept the actual receipts: report

Trump-endorsed candidate Herschel Walker has staked out his position as a no-compromise anti-abortion candidate in his run against incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock.However, The Daily Beast is now reporting that Walker once paid for an abortion for a former girlfriend, who literally kept the...

www.rawstory.com

​

The woman, who asked not to be identified by the publication, told The Daily Beast that Walker urged her to get an abortion after she got pregnant in 2009, and that she got him to reimburse her for the procedure.​

​

Trump-endorsed candidate Herschel Walker has staked out his position as a no-compromise anti-abortion candidate in his run against incumbent Sen. Raphael Warnock.​

​

"She supported these claims with a $575 receipt from the abortion clinic, a 'get well' card from Walker, and a bank deposit receipt that included an image of a signed $700 personal check from Walker," the publication writes. "The woman said there was a $125 difference because she 'ball-parked' the cost of an abortion after Googling the procedure and added on expenses such as travel and recovery costs."​

​

​

Y'all would dig up the devil if you have too, otherwise in order to get your way, but yes if Walker done this, and then in the same light forgot to use it as his testimony of why he regrets advocating for such a thing if true, and this before moving on to being reinvented on the issue, then people might look at him as being hypocritical on the issue.

However if he regrets the position he once had on the issue (sort of like people being highly regretful of being a Democrat before fighting as a new Republican for the right causes), then who is to use their old ignorances in life as a way to condemn them ????

The main thing is that what was done was realized finally that it was wrong, and after that a person can use it as a testimony on how they were once wrong on a certain issue or upon their actions upon an issue that was realized over time or by instruction that it was wrong.

Something's are embarrassing, so even though a person moves on, and they understand their wrong, they then become advocates to teach other's that it's not good to travel down those paths in life. Doesn't make them hypocrites as long as they don't repeat the offense again while telling other's to not do the same in life. If it weren't this way, then there wouldn't be any redemption for sin, and that's what the devil wants human beings to believe.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Always great to see the transparent tactics of the leftoid filth like this douchebag - who based on that screenname has been a raging dickbag online about politics since the early oughts - who want their pro-abortion anytime for any reason monsters like this "Reverend" Warnock to win and promote this authoritarian garbage at the Senate where they specifically have no power to do any such thing to fixate on someone...

They drop this "October Surprise" bullshit with no time to vet it, from an anonymous source, with hearsay and circumstantial evidence, and they want you to not vote for the guy who will implement pro-life policy because he might have killed someone, when Warnock is already responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths and wants to be responsible for more. Worse, this monster wants to make the American people pay for it with their taxes, which if you want to see an actual insurrection, that's how you'll fucking get one.

So yeah, if someone did this awful thing and was honest about it, but worked the rest of their lives against abortion, I would never feel safe around them because they are a dangerous killer, and I would never trust them, but at least that's something towards earning some grace and a measure of redemption, especially if they accomplished something significant with their public speaking, activism, and / or political career. If Walker did this, he belongs in prison along with his supposed ex-girlfriend. If. And even still, such a person is better to be in office than fucking Warnock, because then you just have to compare which monster is worse.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

that's something towards earning some grace and a measure of redemption,

Redemption and grace from whom?

 

[beagle9]

Always great to see the transparent tactics of the leftoid filth like this douchebag - who based on that screenname has been a raging dickbag online about politics since the early oughts - who want their pro-abortion anytime for any reason monsters like this "Reverend" Warnock to win and promote this authoritarian garbage at the Senate where they specifically have no power to do any such thing to fixate on someone...

They drop this "October Surprise" bullshit with no time to vet it, from an anonymous source, with hearsay and circumstantial evidence, and they want you to not vote for the guy who will implement pro-life policy because he might have killed someone, when Warnock is already responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths and wants to be responsible for more. Worse, this monster wants to make the American people pay for it with their taxes, which if you want to see an actual insurrection, that's how you'll fucking get one.

So yeah, if someone did this awful thing and was honest about it, but worked the rest of their lives against abortion, I would never feel safe around them because they are a dangerous killer, and I would never trust them, but at least that's something towards earning some grace and a measure of redemption, especially if they accomplished something significant with their public speaking, activism, and / or political career. If Walker did this, he belongs in prison along with his supposed ex-girlfriend. If. And even still, such a person is better to be in office than fucking Warnock, because then you just have to compare which monster is worse.

Wonder how along the pregnancy was ? Many people back in the 60s and seventies were brainwashed to believe that certain things were ok and cool because of trend's or worse they figured it was an ok thing because everyone seemingly was doing it.

Let's hope that people like Walker who may have fell into the trap, realized his wrong, and dug his way back out, otherwise given that his stance is now pro-life, and better yet his policies are conservative, so I say give him a chance if he's sincere. Like you say this Waynick guy is way worse, so hopefully the people choose the right person.

The Publican/tax collector and a Pharisee went into the temple to pray, and the Pharisee boasted within his prayer to the Lord, but the publican couldn't even lift his head up, and therefore humbled himself in his prayer's before the Lord as he prayed in shame of his past sins committed. Who do you think was lifted up in their prayer's that day ?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

beagle9 220810-#4,580 Christian values are a plus, and they are a necessity in creating a civilized society.

NFBW: That FYI Ray From Cleveland is a Republican anti-abortion voter being a threat to democracy.

I live in a civilized society that is based on the rule of law. Secular, blindfolded to religion, law that has nothing to do with beagle9 ‘s Christian values. Do you agree? END2211090846

 

[healthmyths]

beagle9 220810-#4,580 Christian values are a plus, and they are a necessity in creating a civilized society.

NFBW: That FYI Ray From Cleveland is a Republican anti-abortion voter being a threat to democracy.

I live in a civilized society that is based on the rule of law. Secular, blindfolded to religion, law that has nothing to do with beagle9 ‘s Christian values. Do you agree? END2211090846

I deal in facts.
The facts are if women are responsible for their own bodies and a woman driver kills another person she is responsible right?
Then why would these responsible women have unprotected sex for a few moments pleasure at the expense of over 60 million human beings not responsible?
But much of your point is again validation of the responsibility of these women who evidently aren't capable so at least the law should be passed to sterilize irresponsible women after their first Abortion. What actually as statistics proof is that ...
About half of all U.S. women having an abortion have had one previously.

Repeat Abortion, Repeat Unintended Pregnancy, Repeated and Misguided Government Policies

About half of all U.S. women having an abortion have had one previously. This fact—not new, but dramatically underscored in a recent report from the Guttmacher Institute on the characteristics of women having repeat abortions—may surprise and concern some policymakers, even prochoice ones...

www.guttmacher.org

Guttmacher’s latest available figures are from 2020, when it says there were 930,160 abortions nationwide, up from 916,460 in 2019.

What the data says about abortion in the U.S.

The U.S. abortion rate has generally declined since the 1980s, but there have been slight upticks in the late 2010s and early 2020s.

www.pewresearch.org

So half of 930,160 abortions were done by women who've killed babies before.
Women making a request for a 2nd abortion should be sterilized as they ARE NOT responsible and therefore prevent them from future deaths.
And they should be HAPPY about that because they aren't KILLING another human and they are not
giving up their right to their body. We would NOT give a gun to a person that has killed two people before
would we? So why allow irresponsible women to have the right to killing humans?

 

[Stann]

I deal in facts.
The facts are if women are responsible for their own bodies and a woman driver kills another person she is responsible right?
Then why would these responsible women have unprotected sex for a few moments pleasure at the expense of over 60 million human beings not responsible?
But much of your point is again validation of the responsibility of these women who evidently aren't capable so at least the law should be passed to sterilize irresponsible women after their first Abortion. What actually as statistics proof is that ...
About half of all U.S. women having an abortion have had one previously.

Repeat Abortion, Repeat Unintended Pregnancy, Repeated and Misguided Government Policies

About half of all U.S. women having an abortion have had one previously. This fact—not new, but dramatically underscored in a recent report from the Guttmacher Institute on the characteristics of women having repeat abortions—may surprise and concern some policymakers, even prochoice ones...

www.guttmacher.org

Guttmacher’s latest available figures are from 2020, when it says there were 930,160 abortions nationwide, up from 916,460 in 2019.

What the data says about abortion in the U.S.

The U.S. abortion rate has generally declined since the 1980s, but there have been slight upticks in the late 2010s and early 2020s.

www.pewresearch.org

So half of 930,160 abortions were done by women who've killed babies before.
Women making a request for a 2nd abortion should be sterilized as they ARE NOT responsible and therefore prevent them from future deaths.
And they should be HAPPY about that because they aren't KILLING another human and they are not
giving up their right to their body. We would NOT give a gun to a person that has killed two people before
would we? So why allow irresponsible women to have the right to killing humans?

Your simplistic and over critical assessment of abortion is an insult to all women. Women know what they're doing. An abortion can never be a crime no matter what kind of laws you put in place trying to regulate it. The government and the courts have no right to interfere with this process. Talk about government overreach, this is the ultimate.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

An abortion can never be a crime

Already is, retard. Get fucked.

 

[miketx]

Your simplistic and over critical assessment of abortion is an insult to all women. Women know what they're doing. An abortion can never be a crime no matter what kind of laws you put in place trying to regulate it. The government and the courts have no right to interfere with this process. Talk about government overreach, this is the ultimate.

Another heinous butcher has spake!

 

[healthmyths]

Your simplistic and over critical assessment of abortion is an insult to all women. Women know what they're doing. An abortion can never be a crime no matter what kind of laws you put in place trying to regulate it. The government and the courts have no right to interfere with this process. Talk about government overreach, this is the ultimate.

So why did over half the abortions by this knowledgable women be done by women who had a previous abortion?
Are they that stupid? If so why would we want any offspring of such dumb irresponsible women?
It is an insult yes... but not all women! Women that are responsible enough NOT to succumb to sexual desires of the moment KNOWING full well that killing another human maybe the result of their few moments of pleasure. To me that is not an insult.
That is acknowledging that at least some if not many women are smart enough not to be suckered in by some horny man.
You are defending the male when you say I'm insulting the women. Again I'm insulting the dumb women that kill another human.
Please tell me the difference between a woman who drives a car that kills another human and a woman who has sex frivolously only to kill another human. I remind you of the statistics...less the 5% of abortions are done due to incest/rape or health of the mother.
All of which are understandable. But this crap about a woman's right to her body means she can literally kill another human is wrong!

 

[ChemEngineer]

"If you didn't want to go to Chicago, why did you get on the bus?" - Garrison Keillor, speaking to women who promote killing innocent, unborn babies, whose fathers have NO SAY whether their child will be supported by them for 18 years, or thrown into the garbage

 

[healthmyths]

NFBW: You have no way of knowing that to be true so that statement is a lie. You are a liar.

What I am wrestling with in the wake of abortion rights being overturned is the fundamental tension between Southerners like me, and conservative white women like my childhood friend, who quietly take advantage of abortion rights while helping abolish them.​

​

Put simply, there's a lot of hypocrisy down here, and I no longer know how to feel about it. It dawned on me this summer that in my experience, anti-choice women access abortion care at the same rates as everyone else I know. Indeed, the women in my own life who I witnessed most frequently seek elective abortions have also been the women who present themselves as "good" conservative Christians. Who, I now wonder, have I really been keeping abortion secret for all this time?​

The white, conservative Southern women who asked me to keep their abortions secret​

Statistics are hard to come by on this issue, but what we do know about abortion access proves my experiences are likely representative of a broad trend. To determine how often anti-choice women are accessing the care they claim to revile, we have only to look at some hard facts and (I hope) familiar numbers: worldwide, 1 in 4 women have had an abortion. Almost a third of pregnancies miscarry, and eight percent have complications that can threaten the life of the parent or child. As for sexual violence, that happens in the U.S. literally once every minute, totaling half a million victims per year. Statistically, there is no way these overwhelming numbers don't reach into conservative families.​

END2209250836

What is the source for your above facts?
Here are MY FACTS supported with links..

A) the fallacy regarding Rape, incest and health of the mother justifies killing babies.
Just 1% of women obtain an abortion because they became pregnant through rape, and less than 0.5% do so because of incest, according to the Guttmacher Institute

Rape and incest account for hardly any abortions. So why are they now a focus?

Just 1% of women obtain an abortion because they became pregnant through rape, and less than 0.5% do so because of incest.

www.usatoday.com

1.5% of 62,507,884 or 937,618 babies killed.
Now as far as a woman's health:4% of abortions are due to health of the mother. U.S. Abortion Statistics
B) The remaining 94.5% of the 62,507,884 lives lost since 1973 are because of the woman making her own decision.

Repeat Abortion, Repeat Unintended Pregnancy, Repeated and Misguided Government Policies

About half of all U.S. women having an abortion have had one previously. This fact—not new, but dramatically underscored in a recent report from the Guttmacher Institute on the characteristics of women having repeat abortions—may surprise and concern some policymakers, even prochoice ones...

www.guttmacher.org

 

[ChemEngineer]

My friend, healthmyths, Leftists do not utilize facts, nor common sense. They don't even give a rip about history. All they know is clinging to power and arrogance and condescension and putting their boot in your face.
Evil is like that.

 

[Stann]

Already is, retard. Get fucked.

Maybe some ridiculous red states can charge that but it never is a crime it's part of life like birth and death and everything else.

 

[CarsomyrPlusSix]

Maybe some ridiculous red states can charge that

Yes, we press criminal charges for this crime.

Which means it is a crime, imbecile, whether you like it or not.

 

[miketx]

Maybe some ridiculous red states can charge that but it never is a crime it's part of life like birth and death and everything else.

Killing your child is not part of life you evil butchering fiend. You need to burn in hell.

 

[Delldude]

Maybe some ridiculous red states can charge that but it never is a crime it's part of life like birth and death and everything else.

That's the beautiful thing about the 10th amendment.......it's up to the people to decide, not the government.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

Killing your child

NFBW: No pregnant woman is “killing a child” when she devised to terminates a fetus attached to her own uterus. It’s no one’s business but hers. Get over yourself with your Christo-super-religious fascism. END2211091222

 

[healthmyths]

My friend, healthmyths, Leftists do not utilize facts, nor common sense. They don't even give a rip about history. All they know is clinging to power and arrogance and condescension and putting their boot in your face.
Evil is like that.

View attachment 723130

You are 100% right! Hopefully though some of those that waiver and have been so grossly mislead by the MSM might find the facts I'm sharing helpful... but sadly you are right about the leftist/EVangelistas/socialistic/on-size-fits-all mentality!

 

[healthmyths]

Maybe some ridiculous red states can charge that but it never is a crime it's part of life like birth and death and everything else.

So if a mass shooter kills a relative of yours would you say it wasn't a crime because the shooter was responsible for his own actions?
What is the difference between a woman who has had an abortion, didn't learn from her first experience and goes for another abortion?
Please explain the difference as I'd like to understand how if the woman is responsible for her own body, why would she have unprotected sex? As that's the ONLY way she can get pregnant as 95.5% of abortions were NOT because the woman was a victim of incest,rape or health issues. Why do 50% of abortions are done by woman who have had a previous abortion? Are they not responsible for their actions?

Repeat Abortion, Repeat Unintended Pregnancy, Repeated and Misguided Government Policies

About half of all U.S. women having an abortion have had one previously. This fact—not new, but dramatically underscored in a recent report from the Guttmacher Institute on the characteristics of women having repeat abortions—may surprise and concern some policymakers, even prochoice ones...

www.guttmacher.org