You might not be one who is being led, you may be a leader. You claim to understand the meaning of fascism and you say nothing against the tactic being discussed.
I gave everybody a choice when I wrote the OP for this discussion. The answers and mostlly avoidance of answers are satisfactorily revealing.
It's now the expression, 'smaller government' can be recognized as an introduction to fascism.
And il's no secret that the notion of smaller government has always been thought of as taking extremist measures to make it so.
You might not be one who is being led, you may be a leader. You claim to understand the meaning of fascism and you say nothing against the tactic being discussed.
Because the tactic you claimed makes no sense.
It's now the expression, 'smaller government' can be recognized as an introduction to fascism.
Which fascist party/government has ever called for smaller government with less power?
And il's no secret that the notion of smaller government has always been thought of as taking extremist measures to make it so.
Like cutting taxes and eliminating regulations and government departments.
Not midnight arrests and gulags.