Republicans Arguing To Revive A Law From 1864. Nothing Says More About The GOP Than This

[martybegan]

Democrats are running on Republicans wanting government to utterly control women.

Its going to be fun!

And Trump just ended that by saying leave it to the States.

 

[jc456]

What rights did that post Civil War Reconstruction era act take away from American citizens? You support the ability to take rights away from American.

What rights did the 1864 act take away?

 

[jc456]

Democrats are running on Republicans wanting government to utterly control women.

Its going to be fun!

demofks are running on that it's okay to call a man a woman. Yeah, can't get any more demoralizing to a gender than that. Their menstrual cycles mean nothing to fking demofks, their ovary issues mean absolutely nothing to demofks, insulting women globally.

Any day fking prick.

 

[jc456]

Trump committed a violation that boke the law. There is no equivalence here.

what law did he violate?

 

[jc456]

What rights did the 1864 act take away?

Ahh look at ole BlindBoo , the right to kill a baby is a right being taken away? Nope, changes how they can do it, but not taking away.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

And yet you don't have a problem with going after Trump with laws from the Civil War era.

Section 241: Trump Could Be Charged Under 1870 Statute Used To Prosecute KKK—Here’s What To Know About It

The statute, dating back to just after the Civil War, could punish Trump for attempting to interfere with the vote count.

www.forbes.com

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/08/03/enforcement-acts-trump-00109622

WOW...............It's been used time and time again.
Which makes the code justified.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(a), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7018(a), (b)(1), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(a), title XXXII, §§ 320103(a), 320201(a), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(A), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)

Teabaggers are using a law that hasn't been used since Arizona was a territory.
Are teabaggers going to apply that law to Las Vegas too?

The boundaries for the original territory, if they had kept their same size, would have made present-day Las Vegas part of Arizona. In 1867, though, Congress transferred the Arizona Territory's northwestern corner, specifically most of its land west of the Colorado River, to the state of Nevada.

 

[GMCGeneral]

The worst part is Republicans are still supporting it

Supporting what is right?

 

[jc456]

WOW...............It's been used time and time again.
Which makes the code justified.

it was never used until Trump!!!!

 

[Hollie]

it was never used until Trump!!!!

Never used until Dem governor Hobbs.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And now Arizona will be a tool Dimocrats can use. Perfect timing guys. Way to go.

This has been the goal of the GOP for 50+ years. We're you not paying attention, when you voted?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

A couple of cells isn't a human. You're going to lose this battle, psycho.

Every person on the planet throughout human history started off as a couple cells. Every single one.

 

[jc456]

And women’s rights matter

then why do you allow men to mock them? Weird how you think you're for women when in fact, you're for killing babies.

 

[boevans]

And Trump just ended that by saying leave it to the States.

It is costing him already hundreds of thousands prolife voters.

 

[para bellum]

Yeah, Para seems to want to disregard inconvenient facts. He's a true MAGA-ite.

Eh? What facts do you think I am disregarding?

 

[martybegan]

It is costing him already hundreds of thousands prolife voters.

Maybe, unless he reminds them they now have the power at the State level to implement their goals due directly to his SC justice appointments.

 

[boevans]

Maybe, unless he reminds them they now have the power at the State level to implement their goals due directly to his SC justice appointments.

It won't get him the votes he's going to need, imho.

 

[martybegan]

It won't get him the votes he's going to need, imho.

So far all you are getting is the Dem spin on this, once he's on the campaign trail it will sort itself out.

Especially when Dems continue to force the trans nonsense on everyone.

 

[boevans]

So far all you are getting is the Dem spin on this, once he's on the campaign trail it will sort itself out.

Especially when Dems continue to force the trans nonsense on everyone.

Let's see where this go. It's bad news in Magaritaville.

 

[my2¢]

Our U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1788, should judges ignore it?

I believe Trump got baited by media when a question was called out if he thought Arizona's Supreme Court, "went too far"? He gave a reasonable answer only after his initial "yes". NBC quoting him as saying the court went too far. As if he believed the court should legislate.

 

[Unkotare]

Democrats are running on Republicans wanting government to utterly control women.

Its going to be fun!

The democrats are lying? What a surprise.