1864 vs 1870 vs 1917

[Independentthinker]

OK, so, we've got the Arizona supreme court making a recent ruling enforcing an anti-abortion law on their books since 1864 and the left are all up in arms over an 1864 law being used.

But

They seem perfectly fine with prosecuting Trump using a civil war era law from 1870:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/01/trump-indictment-civil-rights-law/

and prosecuting Trump using yet another law dating back to 1917:

Trump faces 31 charges under the Espionage Act: The law on government secrets explained

The Espionage Act, used to charge Trump, is a 1917 law that outlines the type of sensitive government information that is illegal to mishandle.

abcnews.go.com

Can anyone say hypocrisy?

 

[Votto]

Hypocrisy.

 

[rightwinger]

I am OK with it

Let Republicans run on banning abortion in November

 

[dudmuck]

OK, so, we've got the Arizona supreme court making a recent ruling enforcing an anti-abortion law on their books since 1864 and the left are all up in arms over an 1864 law being used.

But

They seem perfectly fine with prosecuting Trump using a civil war era law from 1870:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/01/trump-indictment-civil-rights-law/

and prosecuting Trump using yet another law dating back to 1917:

Trump faces 31 charges under the Espionage Act: The law on government secrets explained

The Espionage Act, used to charge Trump, is a 1917 law that outlines the type of sensitive government information that is illegal to mishandle.

abcnews.go.com

Can anyone say hypocrisy?

the speaker says "all opposed say no the ayes have it" all in one sentence. Doesn't even allow a proper vote.

Can't spell crazy without R-AZ.

 

[Independentthinker]

the speaker says "all opposed say no the ayes have it" all in one sentence. Doesn't even allow a proper vote.

Can't spell crazy without R-AZ.

Do we enforce laws or not?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

OK, so, we've got the Arizona supreme court making a recent ruling enforcing an anti-abortion law on their books since 1864 and the left are all up in arms over an 1864 law being used.

But

They seem perfectly fine with prosecuting Trump using a civil war era law from 1870:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/01/trump-indictment-civil-rights-law/

and prosecuting Trump using yet another law dating back to 1917:

Trump faces 31 charges under the Espionage Act: The law on government secrets explained

The Espionage Act, used to charge Trump, is a 1917 law that outlines the type of sensitive government information that is illegal to mishandle.

abcnews.go.com

Can anyone say hypocrisy?

you are seriously confused -- yet again

next

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I am OK with it

Let Republicans run on banning abortion in November

Bingo!

 

[Auld Phart]

I am OK with it

Let Republicans run on banning abortion in November

they banned abortion?

 

[NotfooledbyW]

The thing about the 1864 is that it is being used to allow the government to force full term gestation on all pregnant women with no exception for rape and incest.

The law was passed when women did not have a right to vote against or for the white Christian men who made the law.

Arizona must enforce 1864 abortion ban that contains no exceptions for rape or incest, state Supreme Court rules

The Arizona Supreme Court determined in a 4-2 decision that the long-dormant law “is now enforceable” following the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in June 2022.

nypost.com

Republican Arizona Senate hopeful Kari Lake, who lost to Hobbs in the 2022 gubernatorial election quickly distanced herself from the decision. •¥• “I speak to more Arizonans than anyone and it is abundantly clear that the pre-statehood law is out of step with Arizonans,” she said in a statement.​

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Do we enforce laws or not?

Mr. Trump is finding out.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

they banned abortion?

Wake up. The election is coming

 

[Auld Phart]

the speaker says "all opposed say no the ayes have it" all in one sentence. Doesn't even allow a proper vote.

Can't spell crazy without R-AZ.

Can't spell crazy without R-AZ.

I'll be you focus on 'fun' in funeral too.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

OK, so, we've got the Arizona supreme court making a recent ruling enforcing an anti-abortion law on their books since 1864 and the left are all up in arms over an 1864 law being used.

But

They seem perfectly fine with prosecuting Trump using a civil war era law from 1870:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/01/trump-indictment-civil-rights-law/

and prosecuting Trump using yet another law dating back to 1917:

Trump faces 31 charges under the Espionage Act: The law on government secrets explained

The Espionage Act, used to charge Trump, is a 1917 law that outlines the type of sensitive government information that is illegal to mishandle.

abcnews.go.com

Can anyone say hypocrisy?

Jim Crow is calling you. On line 45

 

[Auld Phart]

Wake up. The election is coming

and?

is voting on abortion a national thing?

or state?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

and?

is voting on abortion a national thing?

or state?

Wake up.

 

[rightwinger]

they banned abortion?

Ask Arizona

 

[Auld Phart]

Ask Arizona

why?

I don't vote in Arizona.

 

[para bellum]

the speaker says "all opposed say no the ayes have it" all in one sentence. Doesn't even allow a proper vote.

Can't spell crazy without R-AZ.

That's how voice votes are done in legislatures. UC's are even more streamlined.

If a recorded vote is wanted, an objection is raised. The speaker either orders the clerk to call the roll, or schedules the vote for later when other recorded votes are being taken.

Garden variety parliamentary procedure...

 

[Votto]

they banned abortion?

Actually, there are more abortions now after Roe.

 

[jc456]

OK, so, we've got the Arizona supreme court making a recent ruling enforcing an anti-abortion law on their books since 1864 and the left are all up in arms over an 1864 law being used.

But

They seem perfectly fine with prosecuting Trump using a civil war era law from 1870:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/01/trump-indictment-civil-rights-law/

and prosecuting Trump using yet another law dating back to 1917:

Trump faces 31 charges under the Espionage Act: The law on government secrets explained

The Espionage Act, used to charge Trump, is a 1917 law that outlines the type of sensitive government information that is illegal to mishandle.

abcnews.go.com

Can anyone say hypocrisy?

ahem, it's called demofks.