Georgia judge rejects lawsuit from GOP officials raising concerns about voting machines

Retard. Do you know what "hypothetical" means? Here, educate yourself.

Definition​

A hypothetical statement is one that proposes a scenario or condition that is not necessarily true or proven but is considered for the sake of argument or exploration. It often involves speculation about possibilities.

So, yes, the statement "there may be green men on Mars" is the essence of a hypothetical statement.

Class Dismissed.
There are no green men on Mars. Hence, not hypothetical.

Let's see some more anger. 🤣
 
There are no green men on Mars. Hence, not hypothetical.

Let's see some more anger. 🤣
Anger at retards? You only wish. You are not that important.

But the next time you post, read it a few times. Will help you look less of a fool.

Now, **** off.
 
Anger at retards? You only wish. You are not that important.

But the next time you post, read it a few times. Will help you look less of a fool.

Now, **** off.
I only wish?! lol. Keep up the angry profanities! :rofl:
 
I only wish?! lol. Keep up the angry profanities! :rofl:
I call you a retard. I prove that you are a retard and your response? "Please...please... do not get angry..." LOL

Yeah, when I get these kinds of stupid responses, I know you retards have nothing more to offer. Thanks for being consistent. :itsok:
 
Speaking of Dem cheating, rigging and election theft Dems do you think you will have enough CHEAT to steal it again?
They sure got you last time. Stole the election and didn't a leave trace of evidence! There must be some smart motherfuckers on their side.
 
A judge has rejected a lawsuit filed by Republican Party officials in Georgia that sought to cast doubt on the security of voting machines that will be used across the state in the upcoming 2024 election.

Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee noted in his ruling issued Friday that the equipment remains certified and the consequences of potential security risks “are – at this point – purely hypothetical.”

The failed lawsuit, filed by GOP officials in DeKalb County and a familiar cast of pro-Trump lawyers just weeks before early voting begins in Georgia, argued the Dominion voting machines are not in compliance with Georgia law. The officials wanted the secretary of state’s office to make voting records and ballot images available for public inspection within 24 hours of the election.


Remember - this isn't the first time a state has thrown out these kinds of bogus claims. All designed to put hurdles in the way of legitimate voting. Here is one case back in May.


I guess if you know your side will lose, you will try anything to prevent the legitimate vote counting.
All part of the playbook.

These 11th hour lawsuits and GOP attempts to change the election laws were telegraphed and predicted years ago.
 
Exactly my point, you ******* retard.

You posted this - "Yes, any future event is going to be "hypothetical." In response to the judge's ruling.

Now, do you understand the judge's ruling? No? Reread it and when done, read it a few more times. Eventually, even a retard like you will get it. Good luck.
Eat your shit and gargle you moron!!

Greg
 
A judge has rejected a lawsuit filed by Republican Party officials in Georgia that sought to cast doubt on the security of voting machines that will be used across the state in the upcoming 2024 election.

Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee noted in his ruling issued Friday that the equipment remains certified and the consequences of potential security risks “are – at this point – purely hypothetical.”

The failed lawsuit, filed by GOP officials in DeKalb County and a familiar cast of pro-Trump lawyers just weeks before early voting begins in Georgia, argued the Dominion voting machines are not in compliance with Georgia law. The officials wanted the secretary of state’s office to make voting records and ballot images available for public inspection within 24 hours of the election.


Remember - this isn't the first time a state has thrown out these kinds of bogus claims. All designed to put hurdles in the way of legitimate voting. Here is one case back in May.


I guess if you know your side will lose, you will try anything to prevent the legitimate vote counting.
Hmmmm…Another legitimate case tossed by the same coward that let big fat Fani stay on her bogus case….coincidence?
 
Hmmmm…Another legitimate case tossed by the same coward that let big fat Fani stay on her bogus case….coincidence?
Sure, run with that. That will give your orange loser a lot of comfort as he sits in prison. :itsok:
 
15th post
A judge has rejected a lawsuit filed by Republican Party officials in Georgia that sought to cast doubt on the security of voting machines that will be used across the state in the upcoming 2024 election.

Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee noted in his ruling issued Friday that the equipment remains certified and the consequences of potential security risks “are – at this point – purely hypothetical.”

The failed lawsuit, filed by GOP officials in DeKalb County and a familiar cast of pro-Trump lawyers just weeks before early voting begins in Georgia, argued the Dominion voting machines are not in compliance with Georgia law. The officials wanted the secretary of state’s office to make voting records and ballot images available for public inspection within 24 hours of the election.


Remember - this isn't the first time a state has thrown out these kinds of bogus claims. All designed to put hurdles in the way of legitimate voting. Here is one case back in May.


I guess if you know your side will lose, you will try anything to prevent the legitimate vote counting.
Seems like one person in that state has more influence than the registered voters have. How long has this been going on in such a beautiful state as Georgia?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom