Republican lawmakers are forced to lie to the American people

This is a shameful display of arrogance on the part of the GOP. Because of Trump's guilt, Republicans are forced to lie to the American people and distort the impeachment proceedings.

Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-AZ. wrote an Op/Ed for Fox News. In it, she wrote, "It seems the seven impeachment managers have conveniently forgotten many of the facts surrounding their deeply flawed case for impeachment. They began by crying out for witnesses, witnesses they could have called in the House, and asking the Senate to do their job for them."

She conveniently left out the fact that a court battle with the White House could last months, years even as shown by the House managers yesterday. For example, the House subpoenaed Don McGahn in April. They are still waiting for his testimony.

Debbie also conveniently left out the reason for the months long delay. Trump is flaunting Congress. He is the first President in our history to defy Congressional subpoenas. Debbie didn't want to talk about that. Instead, she lied by omission.

Then she said, "The call transcript shows zero link between aid and political investigations." Here she is talking to Trump's base and assuming they are all morons. From his withholding military aid approved by Congress to ‘I would like you to do us a favor though" to asking Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, there is a distinct link even a moron would know. Does a thief have to tell Debbie "This is a robbery" for Debbie to know the gun wielding robber is stealing her cash?

She then wrote, "The aid was released without any commitment to new investigations." Yes, that is true, months later, on Sept. 11, after Trump got caught. The whistle blower lodged his complaint in August, and by Sept. 9, the House Intelligence Committee had launched a full-fledged investigation into the July 25 call.

Debbie continued, "Ukraine did not know aid was withheld at the time of the July 25 phone call." That is a clear lie. Testimony from several witnesses indicated that the Ukrainians knew about the withheld military aid by July 25. Isn't Debbie listening to the testimony she is lying about?

Last, but not least, Debbie wrote, "President Trump and President Zelensky have both repeatedly said that there was no pressure. In fact, there are multiple Ukrainian officials on the record saying there was no pressure and no link between the aid and investigations." Once again, she is assuming the reader is a complete fool. No Ukrainian official in his right mind wants to piss off the mercurial American President. The security of their nation, at war with Russia, is dependent upon U.S. aid. Apparently, Debbie didn't know that. Nearly everyone else does.

How did this pathetic woman ever get elected?

Rep. Debbie Lesko: What impeachment managers in Trump'''s Senate trial seem to be forgetting | Fox News
You lost because you never ever had a case....Quit your bellyaching and deal with it.

SalveTestimonial.jpg
 
You were demanding that your GLORIOUS PEOPLES prosecutors would get witnesses and PROVE Orange Man Bad guilty of stuff.

BTW Comrade Traitor, did you mindless fucks ever figure out a crime that the president supposedly committed? No?

Without witnesses, I guess we accept the witnesses that the House already presented in the House. One would think that even a character witness would be in order to stand up for Rump. Or that Rump would want his merry band of criminals to testify to clear his name. He's guilty, get over it. And stop with this denial of charges. They trimmed the charges way down. Rump is much more guilty than the house found. And the General Public is very much aware of that fact. So no matter how much you lie for your Deity, that doesn't change and it's going to a rough year for Rump and the Republican Senators.

What do you mean without witnesses?

Wow, you sure do like to lie. Rump would be proud of you except he disdains you because you didn't give a million or more to his campaign.

Republicans defeat Democratic bids to hear witnesses in Trump trial

The Senate on Friday narrowly rejected motions to call new witnesses in Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, paving the way for a final vote to acquit the president next week and shutting down a weeks-long Democratic effort to secure new witness testimony.


In a 51-49 vote, the Senate defeated a push by Democrats that would have set up votes to depose former national security adviser John Bolton and other witnesses on their knowledge of the Ukraine scandal that led to Trump’s impeachment. The motion would have also allowed votes to subpoena documents from various executive branch departments and agencies.

And where did you get this lie from? From the south end of a mule as spoken by Rump out of it.


Comrade traitor, What the fuck were you gangsters doing in the Soviet Star Chamber in the basement? :dunno:

{
House Republicans, who have been denied the authority to request witnesses in the ongoing impeachment inquiry of President Trump, asked Democrats to summon the anonymous whistleblower to testify publicly.

Republicans leading the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight committees on Wednesday sent a letter to Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff requesting the whistleblower testify in an open session as well as “all individuals he or she relied upon in formulating the complaint.”}

You lying pile of shit.

{
Republicans said they “expect” Schiff to arrange for the testimony because the impeachment inquiry was never formalized with bipartisan rules that would have at least allowed the GOP to request subpoenas for witnesses.

“We may request additional witnesses at the appropriate time as the inquiry continues,” the GOP lawmakers wrote. “Your failure to arrange for the committee to receive this testimony shall constitute evidence of your denial of fundamental fairness and due process.”


}

You scumbag, totalitarian fuck.

{
Collins had requested eight witnesses in addition to any who were "requested by" Trump. Nadler wrote that since he understands Trump "is not requesting any witnesses to appear in our impeachment proceedings," there "is no further reason to address that request."

On other witnesses, Nadler said he agreed with Schiff that these hearings would not be used "as a vehicle to undertake the same sham investigations into the Bidens or 2016 that the president pressed Ukraine to conduct for his personal political benefit, or to facilitate the president's effort to threaten, intimidate, and retaliate against the whistleblower who courageously raised the initial alarm."}

You lying pig.

House Republicans request first impeachment witness: The whistleblower
Nadler denies Republican witness requests, which include whistleblower and Schiff

As for the whistelblower, even the Chief Justice wouldn't read that question. You still don't get it, your corruption runs a mile deep. Half of what you typed was a lie while the rest didn't support your lie. And you presented it anyway. You must be preaching to the party of the rump but the rest of us aren't paying a lot of attention to you anymore.

VOTE is my suggestion. Get involved, everyone.

You mean CIA operative Eric Ciaramella? The DNC hack who ran a domestic espionage operation against the president, an act of treason per Article III?

Tell me traitor, if Trump actually had done what you vermin claim, if he had investigated Joe Biden, how does that compare top Bernie Sanders seeking to remove the man that occupies the office he seeks from office? Bernie LITERALLY is using his power to dislodge his political opponent - an act 10 million times more serious than merely investigating Quid Pro Joe, who isn't even the nominee of your shameful Communist party.

You're such a fraud, don't pretend you have honor or integrity, no one is buying it.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top