Republican lawmakers are forced to lie to the American people

Yes, Trumpā€™s Acquittal Is Real, And Itā€™s Spectacular.

48759730613_6d36751a09_b-998x666.jpg

The most amazing thing about Democrats and their allies in the media is that they never actually lose. Any time it seems like they lose, itā€™s actually the result of cheating and chicanery.

Hillary Clinton didnā€™t lose 2016, the Russians interfered and the Electoral College is racist. Stacy Abrams didnā€™t lose in Georgia, the election was stolen. And sure enough, the calls have already come out to say that House Democrats arenā€™t really going to lose the impeachment trial, because without additional witnesses the trial isnā€™t legitimate and the acquittal isnā€™t real.

Not this time. Mitch McConnell, President Trumpā€™s legal team, and the GOP made fools of the Democrats and drank their milkshake.

This is the behavior of toddlers told they wonā€™t be stopping for ice cream. ā€œItā€™s not fair.ā€ Letā€™s break down this tremendously stupid argument. It was perfectly fair for Democrats to set all the rules in the House impeachment process. They held secret testimony, and then they held hearings with no GOP witnesses. Then they held hearings where maybe the White House could have witnesses, at Fat Jerry's discretion, but those witnesses couldnā€™t have legal counsel.

Then instead of subpoenaing the witnesses they wanted like John Bolton and Mick Mulvaney, the Democrats said, ā€œOh my goodness, thereā€™s no time for that, this is an emergency, we have to impeach Trump RIGHT NOW!ā€ Even without those witnesses. At that point, they sat on the articles of impeachment for weeks hoping for some miracle to save their hopeless case. And by the way, if the acquittal isnā€™t legitimate because we didnā€™t hear from Bolton, how on earth is the impeachment itself legitimate?

The speed with which coordinated Democratic talking points infect the news media represents some of the most efficient propaganda the nation has ever seen. Efficient, but not effective. Only those already in the pews of the Church of Orange Man Bad are buying this latest nonsense argument. The U.S. Senate decides what an impeachment trial looks like, and whatever they decide is by definition legitimate.

Now that this unbelievable waste of five months inflicted on the American people in an attempt to undermine their democratic rights is coming to an end, the takeaway is not that Republicans acted unfairly, itā€™s that Democrats predictably got their rear ends kicked. Those same Democrats were warned for months that this was the only outcome their doomed impeachment could lead to, but nonetheless they persisted, and made fools of themselves.

Conservatives today are celebrating and mocking a media that still doesnā€™t understand how wrong it constantly is and why. The leftist establishment took their best shot at President Trump and today it glances harmlessly off his chin. Make no mistake: Donald Trumpā€™s acquittal is real, and it is spectacular.

f4d2829d2a2f948b8e66c2742714b1e1.jpg

A Great Time To Be An American!
 
I am sincerely concerned about our nation's security if Trump is acquitted then reelected in the November election.

Already his has made several dubious decisions that have injured our country. I will begin by saying, Trump has never stated the obvious. He has never said that Putin's Russia interfered in our 2016 Presidential election. Now he has invited foreign interference in our next Presidential election.

Trump removed the U.S. from the Iranian nuclear agreement (JCPOA) that permanently barred Iran from making a nuclear weapon. It is has been replaced by harsh economic sanctions on Iran and she has retaliated, even shooting down a very expensive American airplane. Iran has followed Trump's example and has removed herself from the JCPOA and resumed her nuclear research. Today, she is far closer to making a nuclear weapon. Trump brought us close to war with Iran in December, and it didn't happen because he backed down. 34 American troops were wounded in Iraq by Iranian missiles. Trump said the injuries weren't serious, little more than headaches, he said. Originally, he lied, saying no American troops were hurt. Iran is Russia's ally and Putin is enormously pleased by all this. Anything that weakens America pleases him.

But Putin is Trump's buddy. Trump admires him and he told an American audience while in Helsinki that Putin can be trusted. He said Putin was sincere.

Trump's pro-Israel policy has caused the U.S. to be effectively removed as a broker in the Middle East talks. Neither the Arab republics nor our allies can trust Trump. The U.S. has been replaced by Russia.

Twice Trump has retreated in Syria, abandoning our allies there. Who benefits? Russia, of course, along with her ally, the murderous Syrian dictator, Bashar al-Assad.

Trump has removed the U.S. as the leader of the free world. Britain, France, and Germany have decided to take up the slack. They don't trust Trump. Putin is overjoyed at this development.

What will happen if Trump is given another four years? Obviously, no one has any idea, but we know one thing for sure. It won't be good. Some still wonder today how this man became our President.

But we hear from his supporters, and we get some idea.
Don't be, he replaced the traitor obuthole, we are better off.
 
This is a shameful display of arrogance on the part of the GOP. Because of Trump's guilt, Republicans are forced to lie to the American people and distort the impeachment proceedings.

Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-AZ. wrote an Op/Ed for Fox News. In it, she wrote, "It seems the seven impeachment managers have conveniently forgotten many of the facts surrounding their deeply flawed case for impeachment. They began by crying out for witnesses, witnesses they could have called in the House, and asking the Senate to do their job for them."

She conveniently left out the fact that a court battle with the White House could last months, years even as shown by the House managers yesterday. For example, the House subpoenaed Don McGahn in April. They are still waiting for his testimony.

Debbie also conveniently left out the reason for the months long delay. Trump is flaunting Congress. He is the first President in our history to defy Congressional subpoenas. Debbie didn't want to talk about that. Instead, she lied by omission.

Then she said, "The call transcript shows zero link between aid and political investigations." Here she is talking to Trump's base and assuming they are all morons. From his withholding military aid approved by Congress to ā€˜I would like you to do us a favor though" to asking Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, there is a distinct link even a moron would know. Does a thief have to tell Debbie "This is a robbery" for Debbie to know the gun wielding robber is stealing her cash?

She then wrote, "The aid was released without any commitment to new investigations." Yes, that is true, months later, on Sept. 11, after Trump got caught. The whistle blower lodged his complaint in August, and by Sept. 9, the House Intelligence Committee had launched a full-fledged investigation into the July 25 call.

Debbie continued, "Ukraine did not know aid was withheld at the time of the July 25 phone call." That is a clear lie. Testimony from several witnesses indicated that the Ukrainians knew about the withheld military aid by July 25. Isn't Debbie listening to the testimony she is lying about?

Last, but not least, Debbie wrote, "President Trump and President Zelensky have both repeatedly said that there was no pressure. In fact, there are multiple Ukrainian officials on the record saying there was no pressure and no link between the aid and investigations." Once again, she is assuming the reader is a complete fool. No Ukrainian official in his right mind wants to piss off the mercurial American President. The security of their nation, at war with Russia, is dependent upon U.S. aid. Apparently, Debbie didn't know that. Nearly everyone else does.

How did this pathetic woman ever get elected?

Rep. Debbie Lesko: What impeachment managers in Trump'''s Senate trial seem to be forgetting | Fox News

There are a lot of members of tramps cult here on this message forum and they took on his bad habits, ie. avoiding the truth.

Well, you picked up one from Nancy Pelosi; i.e. being stupid.
 
Only thing worse than TDS is a wall of TDS.

Leave building walls to president Trump.

You do this everyday... You continually gaslight...

You offer no debate... Truth is GOP is ignoring that the WH is obstructing Congress subpoena...

GOP are setting precedences which will make them crazy when Democrats are in charge...

You are not here for discussion, just insults... When this turns around do expect anyone to listen to you?

Sheepboi, can you show where the executive is an inferior branch subject to the dictates of one party in one house of congress?

The TRUTH is that the Stalinist in the house are obstructing the President with politically motivated witch hunts. Adam the lying little Schitt and Nazi Pelosi should be criminally charged with obstructing the executive.

You're fucking nuts. You sound like a Nazi that wants to worship an authoritarian who gets no dissent , much like a Saddam Hussein. But you know what? You and your fellow Nazi's can stick a cucumber up your asses and bark at the moon,

Fuck off and die.
You're a commie retard, you stick a cucumber up your, a#$ and cry like the bitch you are.
 
This is a shameful display of arrogance on the part of the GOP. Because of Trump's guilt, Republicans are forced to lie to the American people and distort the impeachment proceedings.

Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-AZ. wrote an Op/Ed for Fox News. In it, she wrote, "It seems the seven impeachment managers have conveniently forgotten many of the facts surrounding their deeply flawed case for impeachment. They began by crying out for witnesses, witnesses they could have called in the House, and asking the Senate to do their job for them."

She conveniently left out the fact that a court battle with the White House could last months, years even as shown by the House managers yesterday. For example, the House subpoenaed Don McGahn in April. They are still waiting for his testimony.

Debbie also conveniently left out the reason for the months long delay. Trump is flaunting Congress. He is the first President in our history to defy Congressional subpoenas. Debbie didn't want to talk about that. Instead, she lied by omission.

Then she said, "The call transcript shows zero link between aid and political investigations." Here she is talking to Trump's base and assuming they are all morons. From his withholding military aid approved by Congress to ā€˜I would like you to do us a favor though" to asking Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, there is a distinct link even a moron would know. Does a thief have to tell Debbie "This is a robbery" for Debbie to know the gun wielding robber is stealing her cash?

She then wrote, "The aid was released without any commitment to new investigations." Yes, that is true, months later, on Sept. 11, after Trump got caught. The whistle blower lodged his complaint in August, and by Sept. 9, the House Intelligence Committee had launched a full-fledged investigation into the July 25 call.

Debbie continued, "Ukraine did not know aid was withheld at the time of the July 25 phone call." That is a clear lie. Testimony from several witnesses indicated that the Ukrainians knew about the withheld military aid by July 25. Isn't Debbie listening to the testimony she is lying about?

Last, but not least, Debbie wrote, "President Trump and President Zelensky have both repeatedly said that there was no pressure. In fact, there are multiple Ukrainian officials on the record saying there was no pressure and no link between the aid and investigations." Once again, she is assuming the reader is a complete fool. No Ukrainian official in his right mind wants to piss off the mercurial American President. The security of their nation, at war with Russia, is dependent upon U.S. aid. Apparently, Debbie didn't know that. Nearly everyone else does.

How did this pathetic woman ever get elected?

Rep. Debbie Lesko: What impeachment managers in Trump'''s Senate trial seem to be forgetting | Fox News

Given what you've called her...I suspect she would be the second coming of Adam Schitt.
 
There is every bit as much basis for charging Nazi Pelosi with obstructing the president as there is for the baseless impeachment.,

Comrade, Adam the lying little Schitt was attempting to dictate to the Senate how to conduct the trial, WHO is the authoritarian?

You fucking little Nazis failed in your coup. Will you vile vermin, you gutter pigs become violent now?

The Coup, as you call it, is done. Rump is roast Rump in November. You can go down with the Captain that is taking the ship down with him or you can get a decent candidate for 2020 and win. But from what I see, you are willing to burn everything to the ground. So be it.

I thought you would remove him? Just a week ago you swore you would.

Now you think that you made America proud with your clown show, so you're going to sweep up in November, right?

stg012920dAPR20200129034519.jpg

I did? maybe the moderators should be made aware someone else is posting with my name in here. Or is this another case of Tourrettes in your case. Do you always type whatever nonsense is at the top of your very strange mind? Or do you have a team of monkeys with keyboards doing your typing for you.

You were demanding that your GLORIOUS PEOPLES prosecutors would get witnesses and PROVE Orange Man Bad guilty of stuff.

BTW Comrade Traitor, did you mindless fucks ever figure out a crime that the president supposedly committed? No?

Without witnesses, I guess we accept the witnesses that the House already presented in the House. One would think that even a character witness would be in order to stand up for Rump. Or that Rump would want his merry band of criminals to testify to clear his name. He's guilty, get over it. And stop with this denial of charges. They trimmed the charges way down. Rump is much more guilty than the house found. And the General Public is very much aware of that fact. So no matter how much you lie for your Deity, that doesn't change and it's going to a rough year for Rump and the Republican Senators.

What do you mean without witnesses? What the fuck were you gangsters doing in the Soviet Star Chamber in the basement? :dunno:
 
The Coup, as you call it, is done. Rump is roast Rump in November. You can go down with the Captain that is taking the ship down with him or you can get a decent candidate for 2020 and win. But from what I see, you are willing to burn everything to the ground. So be it.

I thought you would remove him? Just a week ago you swore you would.

Now you think that you made America proud with your clown show, so you're going to sweep up in November, right?

stg012920dAPR20200129034519.jpg

I did? maybe the moderators should be made aware someone else is posting with my name in here. Or is this another case of Tourrettes in your case. Do you always type whatever nonsense is at the top of your very strange mind? Or do you have a team of monkeys with keyboards doing your typing for you.

You were demanding that your GLORIOUS PEOPLES prosecutors would get witnesses and PROVE Orange Man Bad guilty of stuff.

BTW Comrade Traitor, did you mindless fucks ever figure out a crime that the president supposedly committed? No?

Without witnesses, I guess we accept the witnesses that the House already presented in the House. One would think that even a character witness would be in order to stand up for Rump. Or that Rump would want his merry band of criminals to testify to clear his name. He's guilty, get over it. And stop with this denial of charges. They trimmed the charges way down. Rump is much more guilty than the house found. And the General Public is very much aware of that fact. So no matter how much you lie for your Deity, that doesn't change and it's going to a rough year for Rump and the Republican Senators.

What do you mean without witnesses? What the fuck were you gangsters doing in the Soviet Star Chamber in the basement? :dunno:

Wow, you sure do like to lie. Rump would be proud of you except he disdains you because you didn't give a million or more to his campaign.

Republicans defeat Democratic bids to hear witnesses in Trump trial

The Senate on Friday narrowly rejected motions to call new witnesses in Donald Trumpā€™s impeachment trial, paving the way for a final vote to acquit the president next week and shutting down a weeks-long Democratic effort to secure new witness testimony.


In a 51-49 vote, the Senate defeated a push by Democrats that would have set up votes to depose former national security adviser John Bolton and other witnesses on their knowledge of the Ukraine scandal that led to Trumpā€™s impeachment. The motion would have also allowed votes to subpoena documents from various executive branch departments and agencies.

And where did you get this lie from? From the south end of a mule as spoken by Rump out of it.

upload_2020-2-1_19-36-7.jpeg
 
I thought you would remove him? Just a week ago you swore you would.

Now you think that you made America proud with your clown show, so you're going to sweep up in November, right?

stg012920dAPR20200129034519.jpg

I did? maybe the moderators should be made aware someone else is posting with my name in here. Or is this another case of Tourrettes in your case. Do you always type whatever nonsense is at the top of your very strange mind? Or do you have a team of monkeys with keyboards doing your typing for you.

You were demanding that your GLORIOUS PEOPLES prosecutors would get witnesses and PROVE Orange Man Bad guilty of stuff.

BTW Comrade Traitor, did you mindless fucks ever figure out a crime that the president supposedly committed? No?

Without witnesses, I guess we accept the witnesses that the House already presented in the House. One would think that even a character witness would be in order to stand up for Rump. Or that Rump would want his merry band of criminals to testify to clear his name. He's guilty, get over it. And stop with this denial of charges. They trimmed the charges way down. Rump is much more guilty than the house found. And the General Public is very much aware of that fact. So no matter how much you lie for your Deity, that doesn't change and it's going to a rough year for Rump and the Republican Senators.

What do you mean without witnesses?

Wow, you sure do like to lie. Rump would be proud of you except he disdains you because you didn't give a million or more to his campaign.

Republicans defeat Democratic bids to hear witnesses in Trump trial

The Senate on Friday narrowly rejected motions to call new witnesses in Donald Trumpā€™s impeachment trial, paving the way for a final vote to acquit the president next week and shutting down a weeks-long Democratic effort to secure new witness testimony.


In a 51-49 vote, the Senate defeated a push by Democrats that would have set up votes to depose former national security adviser John Bolton and other witnesses on their knowledge of the Ukraine scandal that led to Trumpā€™s impeachment. The motion would have also allowed votes to subpoena documents from various executive branch departments and agencies.

And where did you get this lie from? From the south end of a mule as spoken by Rump out of it.


Comrade traitor, What the fuck were you gangsters doing in the Soviet Star Chamber in the basement? :dunno:

{
House Republicans, who have been denied the authority to request witnesses in the ongoing impeachment inquiry of President Trump, asked Democrats to summon the anonymous whistleblower to testify publicly.

Republicans leading the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight committees on Wednesday sent a letter to Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff requesting the whistleblower testify in an open session as well as ā€œall individuals he or she relied upon in formulating the complaint.ā€}

You lying pile of shit.

{
Republicans said they ā€œexpectā€ Schiff to arrange for the testimony because the impeachment inquiry was never formalized with bipartisan rules that would have at least allowed the GOP to request subpoenas for witnesses.

ā€œWe may request additional witnesses at the appropriate time as the inquiry continues,ā€ the GOP lawmakers wrote. ā€œYour failure to arrange for the committee to receive this testimony shall constitute evidence of your denial of fundamental fairness and due process.ā€


}

You scumbag, totalitarian fuck.

{
Collins had requested eight witnesses in addition to any who were "requested by" Trump. Nadler wrote that since he understands Trump "is not requesting any witnesses to appear in our impeachment proceedings," there "is no further reason to address that request."

On other witnesses, Nadler said he agreed with Schiff that these hearings would not be used "as a vehicle to undertake the same sham investigations into the Bidens or 2016 that the president pressed Ukraine to conduct for his personal political benefit, or to facilitate the president's effort to threaten, intimidate, and retaliate against the whistleblower who courageously raised the initial alarm."}

You lying pig.

House Republicans request first impeachment witness: The whistleblower
Nadler denies Republican witness requests, which include whistleblower and Schiff
 
This is a shameful display of arrogance on the part of the GOP. Because of Trump's guilt, Republicans are forced to lie to the American people and distort the impeachment proceedings.

Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-AZ. wrote an Op/Ed for Fox News. In it, she wrote, "It seems the seven impeachment managers have conveniently forgotten many of the facts surrounding their deeply flawed case for impeachment. They began by crying out for witnesses, witnesses they could have called in the House, and asking the Senate to do their job for them."

She conveniently left out the fact that a court battle with the White House could last months, years even as shown by the House managers yesterday. For example, the House subpoenaed Don McGahn in April. They are still waiting for his testimony.

Debbie also conveniently left out the reason for the months long delay. Trump is flaunting Congress. He is the first President in our history to defy Congressional subpoenas. Debbie didn't want to talk about that. Instead, she lied by omission.

Then she said, "The call transcript shows zero link between aid and political investigations." Here she is talking to Trump's base and assuming they are all morons. From his withholding military aid approved by Congress to ā€˜I would like you to do us a favor though" to asking Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, there is a distinct link even a moron would know. Does a thief have to tell Debbie "This is a robbery" for Debbie to know the gun wielding robber is stealing her cash?

She then wrote, "The aid was released without any commitment to new investigations." Yes, that is true, months later, on Sept. 11, after Trump got caught. The whistle blower lodged his complaint in August, and by Sept. 9, the House Intelligence Committee had launched a full-fledged investigation into the July 25 call.

Debbie continued, "Ukraine did not know aid was withheld at the time of the July 25 phone call." That is a clear lie. Testimony from several witnesses indicated that the Ukrainians knew about the withheld military aid by July 25. Isn't Debbie listening to the testimony she is lying about?

Last, but not least, Debbie wrote, "President Trump and President Zelensky have both repeatedly said that there was no pressure. In fact, there are multiple Ukrainian officials on the record saying there was no pressure and no link between the aid and investigations." Once again, she is assuming the reader is a complete fool. No Ukrainian official in his right mind wants to piss off the mercurial American President. The security of their nation, at war with Russia, is dependent upon U.S. aid. Apparently, Debbie didn't know that. Nearly everyone else does.

How did this pathetic woman ever get elected?

Rep. Debbie Lesko: What impeachment managers in Trump'''s Senate trial seem to be forgetting | Fox News
I don't think they are forced to lie, I think they actually enjoy it.

Republicans are evil these days. Didn't used to be that way, it all started with Ronnie Raygun, but the Bushs kinda slowed it down. They were really too dumb to be evil, but newt kept it going pretty well through the nineties and by then RWNJ "media" was in full swing and able to take up the reins.

Then came Cheeto Jesus.
 
Do you kiss your mom with those lying lips?

I thought you would remove him? Just a week ago you swore you would.

Now you think that you made America proud with your clown show, so you're going to sweep up in November, right?

stg012920dAPR20200129034519.jpg

I did? maybe the moderators should be made aware someone else is posting with my name in here. Or is this another case of Tourrettes in your case. Do you always type whatever nonsense is at the top of your very strange mind? Or do you have a team of monkeys with keyboards doing your typing for you.

You were demanding that your GLORIOUS PEOPLES prosecutors would get witnesses and PROVE Orange Man Bad guilty of stuff.

BTW Comrade Traitor, did you mindless fucks ever figure out a crime that the president supposedly committed? No?

Without witnesses, I guess we accept the witnesses that the House already presented in the House. One would think that even a character witness would be in order to stand up for Rump. Or that Rump would want his merry band of criminals to testify to clear his name. He's guilty, get over it. And stop with this denial of charges. They trimmed the charges way down. Rump is much more guilty than the house found. And the General Public is very much aware of that fact. So no matter how much you lie for your Deity, that doesn't change and it's going to a rough year for Rump and the Republican Senators.

What do you mean without witnesses? What the fuck were you gangsters doing in the Soviet Star Chamber in the basement? :dunno:

Wow, you sure do like to lie. Rump would be proud of you except he disdains you because you didn't give a million or more to his campaign.

Republicans defeat Democratic bids to hear witnesses in Trump trial

The Senate on Friday narrowly rejected motions to call new witnesses in Donald Trumpā€™s impeachment trial, paving the way for a final vote to acquit the president next week and shutting down a weeks-long Democratic effort to secure new witness testimony.


In a 51-49 vote, the Senate defeated a push by Democrats that would have set up votes to depose former national security adviser John Bolton and other witnesses on their knowledge of the Ukraine scandal that led to Trumpā€™s impeachment. The motion would have also allowed votes to subpoena documents from various executive branch departments and agencies.

And where did you get this lie from? From the south end of a mule as spoken by Rump out of it.

 
I did? maybe the moderators should be made aware someone else is posting with my name in here. Or is this another case of Tourrettes in your case. Do you always type whatever nonsense is at the top of your very strange mind? Or do you have a team of monkeys with keyboards doing your typing for you.

You were demanding that your GLORIOUS PEOPLES prosecutors would get witnesses and PROVE Orange Man Bad guilty of stuff.

BTW Comrade Traitor, did you mindless fucks ever figure out a crime that the president supposedly committed? No?

Without witnesses, I guess we accept the witnesses that the House already presented in the House. One would think that even a character witness would be in order to stand up for Rump. Or that Rump would want his merry band of criminals to testify to clear his name. He's guilty, get over it. And stop with this denial of charges. They trimmed the charges way down. Rump is much more guilty than the house found. And the General Public is very much aware of that fact. So no matter how much you lie for your Deity, that doesn't change and it's going to a rough year for Rump and the Republican Senators.

What do you mean without witnesses?

Wow, you sure do like to lie. Rump would be proud of you except he disdains you because you didn't give a million or more to his campaign.

Republicans defeat Democratic bids to hear witnesses in Trump trial

The Senate on Friday narrowly rejected motions to call new witnesses in Donald Trumpā€™s impeachment trial, paving the way for a final vote to acquit the president next week and shutting down a weeks-long Democratic effort to secure new witness testimony.


In a 51-49 vote, the Senate defeated a push by Democrats that would have set up votes to depose former national security adviser John Bolton and other witnesses on their knowledge of the Ukraine scandal that led to Trumpā€™s impeachment. The motion would have also allowed votes to subpoena documents from various executive branch departments and agencies.

And where did you get this lie from? From the south end of a mule as spoken by Rump out of it.


Comrade traitor, What the fuck were you gangsters doing in the Soviet Star Chamber in the basement? :dunno:

{
House Republicans, who have been denied the authority to request witnesses in the ongoing impeachment inquiry of President Trump, asked Democrats to summon the anonymous whistleblower to testify publicly.

Republicans leading the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight committees on Wednesday sent a letter to Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff requesting the whistleblower testify in an open session as well as ā€œall individuals he or she relied upon in formulating the complaint.ā€}

You lying pile of shit.

{
Republicans said they ā€œexpectā€ Schiff to arrange for the testimony because the impeachment inquiry was never formalized with bipartisan rules that would have at least allowed the GOP to request subpoenas for witnesses.

ā€œWe may request additional witnesses at the appropriate time as the inquiry continues,ā€ the GOP lawmakers wrote. ā€œYour failure to arrange for the committee to receive this testimony shall constitute evidence of your denial of fundamental fairness and due process.ā€


}

You scumbag, totalitarian fuck.

{
Collins had requested eight witnesses in addition to any who were "requested by" Trump. Nadler wrote that since he understands Trump "is not requesting any witnesses to appear in our impeachment proceedings," there "is no further reason to address that request."

On other witnesses, Nadler said he agreed with Schiff that these hearings would not be used "as a vehicle to undertake the same sham investigations into the Bidens or 2016 that the president pressed Ukraine to conduct for his personal political benefit, or to facilitate the president's effort to threaten, intimidate, and retaliate against the whistleblower who courageously raised the initial alarm."}

You lying pig.

House Republicans request first impeachment witness: The whistleblower
Nadler denies Republican witness requests, which include whistleblower and Schiff

As for the whistelblower, even the Chief Justice wouldn't read that question. You still don't get it, your corruption runs a mile deep. Half of what you typed was a lie while the rest didn't support your lie. And you presented it anyway. You must be preaching to the party of the rump but the rest of us aren't paying a lot of attention to you anymore.

VOTE is my suggestion. Get involved, everyone.
 
As for the whistelblower, even the Chief Justice wouldn't read that question. You still don't get it, your corruption runs a mile deep. Half of what you typed was a lie while the rest didn't support your lie. And you presented it anyway. You must be preaching to the party of the rump but the rest of us aren't paying a lot of attention to you anymore.
We can now see the corruption in DC. It's the collusion between the Deep State and the Democrats.
 
As for the whistelblower, even the Chief Justice wouldn't read that question. You still don't get it, your corruption runs a mile deep. Half of what you typed was a lie while the rest didn't support your lie. And you presented it anyway. You must be preaching to the party of the rump but the rest of us aren't paying a lot of attention to you anymore.
We can now see the corruption in DC. It's the collusion between the Deep State and the Democrats.

We just got first hand on the corruption of the Republican Party. I've seen it locally but it's not so bad. But I guess it just multiplies in severity as it goes up until it reaches the level that I never dreamed it could reach at the Federal Level. Your Deep State is also a Red Deep State and it's infestation is in charge right now. As much as I dislike when the Democrats are in charge, it's time to get your criminals out of politics so the rest of us can rebuilt a decent Republican Party like we were once Proud of.
 
As for the whistelblower, even the Chief Justice wouldn't read that question. You still don't get it, your corruption runs a mile deep. Half of what you typed was a lie while the rest didn't support your lie. And you presented it anyway. You must be preaching to the party of the rump but the rest of us aren't paying a lot of attention to you anymore.
We can now see the corruption in DC. It's the collusion between the Deep State and the Democrats.

We just got first hand on the corruption of the Republican Party. I've seen it locally but it's not so bad. But I guess it just multiplies in severity as it goes up until it reaches the level that I never dreamed it could reach at the Federal Level. Your Deep State is also a Red Deep State and it's infestation is in charge right now. As much as I dislike when the Democrats are in charge, it's time to get your criminals out of politics so the rest of us can rebuilt a decent Republican Party like we were once Proud of.

Please provide a list of your "corrupts" and the standard that you use to determine they are such.
 

Forum List

Back
Top