Reposted : I disapprove of the manner which Anwar al-Awlaki was killed.

MikeFrank

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2011
Messages
161
Reaction score
28
Points
16
I want to be clear it seems Anwar al-Awlaki was a bad person; however, my biggest problem is the manner in which this was carried out, who determines if one including american citizens are terrorists? Who determines if one is guilty of treason? Who determines if one is guilty of a crime? It seems that one man, the president of the united states can make that call without any charges or trial or evidence that is presented to a grand jury. This is a very dangerous policy and we as americans should not take it lightly.

I have seen on message boards today on many MSM websites THAT HE WAS AN ENEMY OF THE STATE so he should be killed, again I say, who gets to make that call considering he was never convicted of anything in our legal system.

More : http://www.hermancainforums.com/inde...pic,872.0.html
 

Avorysuds

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
13,834
Reaction score
1,658
Points
245
Location
Eugene Oregon
Courts? But we live in a time where Big Government war loving Neocons and liberals like killing people so they can say FUCK YEAH!!!!! AMERICA!!!! #1
 

uscitizen

Senior Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
45,940
Reaction score
4,908
Points
48
Location
My Shack
Who needs a trial he is a terrorist!
Remember the partiot act that the TP re-upped.
 

Avorysuds

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
13,834
Reaction score
1,658
Points
245
Location
Eugene Oregon
Who needs a trial he is a terrorist!
Remember the partiot act that the TP re-upped.
And Democrats like Obama that you voted for said FUCK YEAH! and expanded? Yeah, I remember that one...

Oh wait, it's about making everyone in the TP or people that don't see the TP fully sold out look bad... Did Rand Paul, Ron Paul vote for it?
 

Dot Com

Nullius in verba
Joined
Feb 15, 2011
Messages
52,842
Reaction score
7,862
Points
1,830
Location
Fairfax, NoVA
Who needs a trial he is a terrorist!
Remember the partiot act that the TP re-upped.
hell yeah!!! The Bu$h II Doctrine

Bush Doctrine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
We will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.
sound familiar?

I NEVER vote Repub :)
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: Jos

Avorysuds

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2010
Messages
13,834
Reaction score
1,658
Points
245
Location
Eugene Oregon
Hey, Ron Paul was already attacked on these boards for talking about this being wrong... Like always it comes down to many people just being slow to understanding why something was bad even when it is spelled out for them.

Oh I'm sure he will be picked on and booed at the next debate by a bunch of wanabe conservatives for not wanting to further erode the constitution.
.
 

Intense

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2009
Messages
44,909
Reaction score
6,775
Points
48
Who needs a trial he is a terrorist!
Remember the partiot act that the TP re-upped.
So you want Obama Impeached over this now? Make up your mind. :eusa_whistle:

Yep as much as I wanted Bush impeached over his lies that led us to war.
Obama has continued the Bush doctrine in full.
Just pulling your tail. :D I think in many ways Bush was as misinformed as most Heads of State, at least those not smuggling Iraqi Oil through Syria.

I'm mixed. I see valid concern on both sides of the issue. The drones have been around for a while now and I would suspect there is a Legal Precedent, that allows for such actions. Not all powers are transparent or known to us. We need Checks and Balances. I suspect they do exist at the highest levels of Government, whether we are aware of them or not. I hope they do. Tyranny can be a threat from any side, when there is imbalance. The transition from soft to hard, can happen in the blink of an eye.
 
Last edited:

freedombecki

Let's go swimmin'!
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
23,687
Reaction score
7,640
Points
198
Location
My house
The terrorists hit were enemies of the people of the United States who knew about and did absolutely nothing to save New Yorkers' lives, and many of America's finest police and firefighters. They did nothing to stop and everything to promote that and other atrocities against America and likely, Israel. What they dished out, they got back in spades. They ran, but they couldn't hide. Their friends will strike back at us.

We didn't start this shit, and we're not gonna take it any more.
 
Last edited:

USArmyRetired

Rookie
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
2,601
Reaction score
360
Points
0
This guy deserved death. He became a enemy combatant. In war we execute people who collaborate with the enemy. Look at the 2 filthy jews who gave our atom bomb secrets away. They were executed. That nutty American who was caught with the Taliban should be executed. I think his name was Lindh. We even executed a deserter during WW2 during the Battle of the Bulge.
 

BlindBoo

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
34,305
Reaction score
4,496
Points
1,130
I want to be clear it seems Anwar al-Awlaki was a bad person; however, my biggest problem is the manner in which this was carried out, who determines if one including american citizens are terrorists? Who determines if one is guilty of treason? Who determines if one is guilty of a crime? It seems that one man, the president of the united states can make that call without any charges or trial or evidence that is presented to a grand jury. This is a very dangerous policy and we as americans should not take it lightly.

I have seen on message boards today on many MSM websites THAT HE WAS AN ENEMY OF THE STATE so he should be killed, again I say, who gets to make that call considering he was never convicted of anything in our legal system.

More : http://www.hermancainforums.com/inde...pic,872.0.html
He was a high level operative in an organization that declared war on us. They attacked us and have killed thousands. We have every reason to believe he was involved in ongoing operations to attack us again.
 

hortysir

In Memorial of 47
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
20,518
Reaction score
4,257
Points
270
Location
Port Charlotte, FL
He was acting as an enemy on the battlefield against us and was killed on that battlefield in a manner that suited the piece of shit that he was.

More oxygen for me.

:clap:

Everybody cheered when UBL was killed.

Now this waste of flesh gets a pass???

Fuck him with his 40 virgins
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top