Might I suggest you resign your mod position if you’re going to post like that?Good point. It is obvious to me rightwingnuts are morons descended from cockroaches. It may be scientifically impossible but…after all who needs research?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Might I suggest you resign your mod position if you’re going to post like that?Good point. It is obvious to me rightwingnuts are morons descended from cockroaches. It may be scientifically impossible but…after all who needs research?
I think you see the point I was making.Might I suggest you resign your mod position if you’re going to post like that?
What point all I saw was totally disgusting name calling by someone who’s supposed to be above that….I think you see the point I was making.
Preventing young children, still learning to speak, from seeing the mouths of other people as they are speaking might impair their own ability to learn to speak?
Who would have imagined such a thing?
View attachment 593143
You can set it aside all you want, it doesn’t make the premise any more credible.
I have observed that rightwingers are morons. That is a pillar of science.
I am not saying they are lying, only that it is their opinion not backed by anything.
The most critical years for speech are the first three years. Kids are that age, we’re almost certainly at home during Covid, daycares we’re closed, and they would not have been in school.
Yet you believe there are no long term effects of the faux vaccine because someone told you so. Wow.You can set it aside all you want, it doesn’t make the premise any more credible. I am not saying they are lying, only that it is their opinion not backed by anything.
The most critical years for speech are the first three years. Kids are that age, we’re almost certainly at home during Covid, daycares we’re closed, and they would not have been in school.
I think you fail to realize that one pillar alone supports nothing, as my more facetious reply indicated.
The basic pillars of the scientific method are:
1) make an observation that describes a problem,
2) create a hypothesis,
3) test the hypothesis
4) draw conclusions based on that test and refine the hypothesis.
Where in the OP is there evidence of the other pillars?
Daily KOs is a kook site too. Both sites are rubbish. You know this...but you don't care...Is that all you could come up with, DailyKOS freak?
I had a severe speech deficiency as a child, so I know what it's like not to be able to communicate effectively. I still am not able to carry on spoken conversations effectively now as an adult.
This is why I find this story so disturbing.
How long are you covidiots in our government going to keep this mask stuff going?
I am not discounting your experiences whatsoever, but you are ignoring my point in your outrage. Observation can colored by our own bias (and you are no more exempt than I), or by our lack of knowledge about a process or behavior (for example someone might observe a group of dogs playing noisily and think it’s a fight). Observation alone isn’t normally a sound basis for making broad conclusions. That is why there are three other pillars.You are not an arbiter of credibility, Coyote. Your innate biases on this topic are leading you to discredit my premise in lieu of any reasonable argument.
How childish and unbecoming of you.
Not an opinion. These parents are observing these things happening to their children, and what's happening to them has driven the parent to seek out proper help.
Therefore you are inferring they are simply making this up due to their opinions.
Is that what I'm getting?
Speech recognition and development go beyond three years.
When carrying on a conversation, a child looks at the person's eyes and lip movements.
Our brains are accustomed to seeing full facial expressions when carrying on a conversation. When you cover half the face, you are hindering any perception of emotion the other person might have. The speech is distorted and imperceptible
Children are new to this. Their social skills and suffer because they are not able to recognize and connect expressions with the appropriate emotions being displayed by another person. Also it hinders their speech, as I said before. It can lead to Aspberger's, which is a syndrome where one is unable to properly read social cues from others.
I know far more about this issue than you because I have experienced it and was traumatized by it.
Observation can colored by our own bias (and you are no more exempt than I)
Like I said, the diagnoses made by these professionals treating these children is the scientific method in motion.Observation alone isn’t normally a sound basis for making broad conclusions. That is why there are three other pillars.
I empathize with parents of young kids. I saw a woman from Loudon County Va, interviewed this morning. She said her 7 year old has never been in school yet when he could see the faces of the other kids. I hope it doesn't cause long term socialization problems for this generation.I had a severe speech deficiency as a child, so I know what it's like not to be able to communicate effectively. I still am not able to carry on spoken conversations effectively now as an adult.
This is why I find this story so disturbing.
How long are you covidiots in our government going to keep this mask stuff going?
REPORT: Mask Mandates Causing Over 350% Surge In Childhood Speech Delays. - The National Pulse
Mask mandates implemented by the government amidst the COVID-19 appear to be causing speech delays in young children.The regulations, which are still in effect in Democrat-led cities including Washington D.C. and New York City, have had adverse effects on the development of speaking abilities in...thenationalpulse.com
Sadly, the damage has already been done.I empathize with parents of young kids. I saw a woman from Loudon County Va, interviewed this morning. She said her 7 year old has never been in school yet when he could see the faces of the other kids. I hope it doesn't cause long term socialization problems for this generation.
“There’s no research out there yet saying that this could be causing speech and language delays. But, most definitely, I’m sure it’s a factor,” Theek said. “It’s very important that kids do see your face to learn, so they’re watching your mouth.”I had a severe speech deficiency as a child, so I know what it's like not to be able to communicate effectively. I still am not able to carry on spoken conversations effectively now as an adult.
This is why I find this story so disturbing.
How long are you covidiots in our government going to keep this mask stuff going?
REPORT: Mask Mandates Causing Over 350% Surge In Childhood Speech Delays. - The National Pulse
Mask mandates implemented by the government amidst the COVID-19 appear to be causing speech delays in young children.The regulations, which are still in effect in Democrat-led cities including Washington D.C. and New York City, have had adverse effects on the development of speaking abilities in...thenationalpulse.com
Didga read the part where that Dr. said there's no research to prove his theory?These Gd liberals should pay with their mother fucking lives for what they've done
“There’s no research out there yet saying that this could be causing speech and language delays. But, most definitely, I’m sure it’s a factor,” Theek said. “It’s very important that kids do see your face to learn, so they’re watching your mouth.”
Florida man don’t talk to his kids…
Only one clinic was referenced.1) Happens with the parents, the clinics, and us.
Alright.2) The hypothesis happens with the parents, clinics, and us.
One clinic was referenced. No tests were performed to determine what masking did to children’s speech.3) Testing of the hypothesis happens when the professionals at these clinics perform tests on the children.
Then the conclusion was drawn without any testing of the hypothesis.4) The conclusion is drawn by the parents, the clinics, and us based on the above.
Indeed it is. But if you read the original article your OP linked to you will they did not make any claims of certainty regarding masking and speech delays. They also observed the biggest increase in patients was in the 2 and under group (again, critical window for speech). Those are not school children.The very field these speech professionals inhabit happens to be scientific in nature. They must use the scientific method to determine what circumstances are affecting these children.