Rep. Pascrell Jr. Seeks To Disbar giuliani And 22 Other trump Lawyers

bear513

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2012
Messages
63,611
Reaction score
11,588
Points
2,030
Who is listening to Trump? Once again anyone can see this election was rigged
It wasn't. The only people that believe that are living in an alternative reality.

Bullshit, once again any moron can see how rigged it was . You got to be a Chicago Democrat stooge to say it wasn't
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
20,846
Reaction score
6,508
Points
265
You assume thinking people agree with your characterization of the lawsuits as frivolous.
What would thinking people say when they see about three dozen lawsuits dismissed so quickly?
 

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
67,471
Reaction score
25,723
Points
2,290
I don't know if anything will come of this but I agree with what he is doing.

giulini and other lawyers have been doing a lot of damage to our nation, election system and democracy.

Lawyers shouldn't be allowed to lie so blatantly and spread conspiracies.

They deserve to be disbarred.

Any Lawyer who uses actual LAW to oppose Leftist Extremist ideology and agendas should be disbarred.

Any American citizen who cites the Constitution in order to oppose the Leftist Extremist ideology and agendas should be sent to re-education camps....
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
20,846
Reaction score
6,508
Points
265
Maybe because they were doxxed and pressured by SJW twats like you?

Fuck off.
No, it's because they don't want to risk their reputation and their law license by doing the unprofessional things Trump demands.
Once again, nothing but your TDS induced opinion.
It's obvious. Just look at the clown car legal team at Giuliani's press conference. They're left with the bottom of the barrel.
 

Eric Arthur Blair

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
19,140
Reaction score
9,556
Points
950
This is not about Trump's reputation being libeled.
It's about theft of our system of elections by Joe Biden and his vote changing machines developed by
Hugo Chavez. Let's keep our eyes on the ball.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
20,640
Reaction score
16,001
Points
2,415
Maybe because they were doxxed and pressured by SJW twats like you?

Fuck off.
No, it's because they don't want to risk their reputation and their law license by doing the unprofessional things Trump demands.
Once again, nothing but your TDS induced opinion.
It's obvious. Just look at the clown car legal team at Giuliani's press conference. They're left with the bottom of the barrel.
Once again, nothing but your TDS induced opinion.
 

postman

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2017
Messages
10,279
Reaction score
2,210
Points
345
But this rep doesn't want a judge to decide it, he wants the Bar Association Rudy is admitted under to disbar him for representing his client and performing as per his client's wishes.
Since Giuliani brought his suits in federal court, he is using his federal law license in order to practice. That license is not subject to the bar association, but to the federal courts. So it will be a judge (or panel of judges) that decides the future of his federal law license.


Subject to general statutory qualifications for attorneys, the power of the federal courts to admit and disbar attorneys rests on the common law from which it was originally derived. According to Chief Justice Taney, it was well settled by the common law that “it rests exclusively with the Court to determine who is qualified to become one of its officers, as an attorney and counselor, and for what cause he ought to be removed
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
20,640
Reaction score
16,001
Points
2,415
But this rep doesn't want a judge to decide it, he wants the Bar Association Rudy is admitted under to disbar him for representing his client and performing as per his client's wishes.
Since Giuliani brought his suits in federal court, he is using his federal law license in order to practice. That license is not subject to the bar association, but to the federal courts. So it will be a judge (or panel of judges) that decides the future of his federal law license.


Subject to general statutory qualifications for attorneys, the power of the federal courts to admit and disbar attorneys rests on the common law from which it was originally derived. According to Chief Justice Taney, it was well settled by the common law that “it rests exclusively with the Court to determine who is qualified to become one of its officers, as an attorney and counselor, and for what cause he ought to be removed
Keep us updated....................
 

Eric Arthur Blair

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2015
Messages
19,140
Reaction score
9,556
Points
950
Pascrell is not a lawyer. He was a school teacher with degrees in philosophy and journalism which makes him about as useful as a fire extinguisher on the bottom of the ocean.
He's a self promoting idiot.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
20,846
Reaction score
6,508
Points
265
It is nice of you to admit you have no clue what thinking people would say.
Enlighten me. How do you thinking people explain that Trump's lawsuits keep getting dismissed, sometimes with some really harsh opinions about the quality of their filings?
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
20,640
Reaction score
16,001
Points
2,415
It is nice of you to admit you have no clue what thinking people would say.
Enlighten me. How do you thinking people explain that Trump's lawsuits keep getting dismissed, sometimes with some really harsh opinions about the quality of their filings?
Thinking people know that a lawsuit being dismissed by a particular judge is in no way proof it is a frivolous lawsuit.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
20,846
Reaction score
6,508
Points
265
Thinking people know that a lawsuit being dismissed by a particular judge is in no way proof it is a frivolous lawsuit.
Okay. But what if there are dozens of lawsuits dismissed by dozens of judges within 2-3 weeks. What would thinking people start to say about it?
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
55,955
Reaction score
12,872
Points
2,190
But this rep doesn't want a judge to decide it, he wants the Bar Association Rudy is admitted under to disbar him for representing his client and performing as per his client's wishes.
The Bar Association isn't going to do anything without a judgement from a lawyer.

Imagine conservatives defending the right to fuck up the judicial system with a flurry of frivolous lawsuits.

This is why no one takes you idiots seriously anymore.
It's called fighting back, something SJW losers like you don't like.

Your problem is you don't believe in the right to have an opinion other than your own.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
20,846
Reaction score
6,508
Points
265
Bullshit, once again any moron can see how rigged it was . You got to be a Chicago Democrat stooge to say it wasn't
And yet you morons can't seem to come up with anything that stands up in court.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
20,640
Reaction score
16,001
Points
2,415
Thinking people know that a lawsuit being dismissed by a particular judge is in no way proof it is a frivolous lawsuit.
Okay. But what if there are dozens of lawsuits dismissed by dozens of judges within 2-3 weeks. What would thinking people start to say about it?
Thinking people know each case stands on it's own, and lumping them all together is what simpletons do.

Feel free to provide links to these "dozens" of lawsuits that have had their final ruling and show the reason for their failure. Keep in mind there is a thing called appeals.

GO!
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
55,955
Reaction score
12,872
Points
2,190
Suing for libel only serves to deter people from libelous actions. Libel is not a matter of opinion, but of fact.
You have it backwards. Libel is a matter of the opinion that people have, and how it's effected of the words cited in the action.

They have to prove harm to reputation, and if it involves a famous person, proving actual malice.
Libel is deliberate falsehoods perpetrated when the libeler knows the actual facts of the matter. Libel is not opinion.

Libel is calling a cat a dog, not thinking a cat is like a dog.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
20,846
Reaction score
6,508
Points
265
It's called fighting back, something SJW losers like you don't like.
You can fight back, no one is stopping you.

But you can't make stupid shit up and take it to a judge without experiencing the consequences of those actions. It's that kind of shit that is fucking up this country.
 

postman

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2017
Messages
10,279
Reaction score
2,210
Points
345
Enlighten me. How do you thinking people explain that Trump's lawsuits keep getting dismissed, sometimes with some really harsh opinions about the quality of their filings?
It's like a baseball players hitting record. Trumps lawyers have at least 23 strikeouts. And the only six times they didn't strike out, the pitcher intentionally walked him.
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
55,955
Reaction score
12,872
Points
2,190
Maybe because they were doxxed and pressured by SJW twats like you?

Fuck off.
No, it's because they don't want to risk their reputation and their law license by doing the unprofessional things Trump demands.
Bullshit. The Lincoln losers go the ball rolling with their doxxing, and the writing was on the wall, "Help Trump and we will ruin you"

Your side just can't play fair, you have to fuck with the process because you don't believe anyone but yourselves have the right to have their views expressed without interference.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top