Remember Who We Are

[Carl in Michigan]

Do you think "free speech" meant threatening an innocent segment of American citizens to the Founders?

buttercup you gave the above statement of mine "false news". Explain to the audience how any of that statement is "false news, except to just be childish and contrarian

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Violation of none of these will be be the reason Khalil will be deported. He is not being denied his right to due process. But you seem to be unable to grasp that concept.

I am seriously beginning to believe it is not PoliticalChic writing now. Not her writing style. And certainly 100% contrary to how she normally thinks and processes information.

I don't think I've ever disagreed with her until now. I don't believe she can be this dense

 

[PoliticalChic]

He supports the terrorist cult HAMAS which is a direct threat to our foreign policy with Israel.

Money?

Weapons?

Words?


Ever hear of free speech?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Where in the Constitution does it say we have to support terrorists or those who support them?

What kind of American are you????


AI Overview
Learn more

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition. It is part of the Bill of Rights, which also includes the other nine amendments added to the Constitution at the same time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Again with the free speech lie

Do you think "free speech" meant threatening an innocent segment of American citizens to the Founders?

I never lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Apparently more than you.

The President has not only the obligation, but the duty to protect AMERICAN CITIZENS.

But you wouldn’t hear of that, huh comrade?

Protect them from words, girly-man????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Violation of none of these will be be the reason Khalil will be deported. He is not being denied his right to due process. But you seem to be unable to grasp that concept.

I am seriously beginning to believe it is not PoliticalChic writing now. Not her writing style. And certainly 100% contrary to how she normally thinks and processes information.

He will be deported for two reasons:

The powers that be want him out

and

not all of us are strong enough to resist the powers when they are wrong.


Where are you?

 

[Leo123]

What kind of American are you????


AI Overview
Learn more

View attachment 1091333
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition. It is part of the Bill of Rights, which also includes the other nine amendments added to the Constitution at the same time.

The kind of American who trusts our border czar Tom Homan who said Khalil is a security threat to the U.S. Free speech does not extend to fomenting or advocating violence.

 

[gipper]

You CANNOT support terrorism. You cannot oppress another group or individual.
And no, he doesn't have the rights of a citizen. Terrorist advocates will never become citizens of this country under Trump

Terrorist advocates…lol. That’s you Carl in Mecca.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Freedom of speech does not protect against inciting violence like we have seen on college campuses. I am the kind of American who abhors violence. Kahlil supports it.

I checked to see if it was reported that he incited the taking over of a building on campus.....see if you can find any.


If you can't.....the Supremes already decided:


In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Supreme Court established the "imminent lawless action" test, limiting government restrictions on speech to cases where it is both directed at inciting imminent violence and likely to produce such action.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• The Case:
  Clarence Brandenburg, a Ku Klux Klan leader, was convicted under an Ohio law that prohibited advocating for violence or crime.
  
  
• The Ohio Law:
  The law, known as the Criminal Syndicalism Act, made it a crime to advocate for violence or crime as a means of political reform.
  
  
• The Supreme Court Ruling:
  The Supreme Court overturned Brandenburg's conviction, finding that the Ohio law violated his First Amendment right to free speech.
  • The speech must be "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action".
  • Google.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

I never lie.

Blink if Anarchist Democrats are holding you against your will

 

[PoliticalChic]

Blink if Anarchist Democrats are holding you against your will

I've supplied my view, and the court decisions that support it, and the Constitutional basis for allowing him to protest.

All you do is repeat "Is not, is not, isssssssss noooooottttttttttttt!!!!?"

I worry when there are immature individuals like you on our side. So very much like the Brown Shirts of an earlier time.

If I had compared you to Lavrentiy Beria, would you have known who I was talking about?

 

[eagle1462010]

He will be deported for two reasons:

The powers that be want him out

and

not all of us are strong enough to resist the powers when they are wrong.


Where are you?

Id say you are wrong to bring in the enemy within.

They terrorized students same as Burn Loot Murder.

This isnt a citizen. Dont let the door hit you on the way out Hamas supporter.

Clarify that is not directed at political chuck but the one being deported

 

[Leo123]

I checked to see if it was reported that he incited the taking over of a building on campus.....see if you can find any.


If you can't.....the Supremes already decided:


In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Supreme Court established the "imminent lawless action" test, limiting government restrictions on speech to cases where it is both directed at inciting imminent violence and likely to produce such action.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• The Case:
  Clarence Brandenburg, a Ku Klux Klan leader, was convicted under an Ohio law that prohibited advocating for violence or crime.
  
  
• The Ohio Law:
  The law, known as the Criminal Syndicalism Act, made it a crime to advocate for violence or crime as a means of political reform.
  
  
• The Supreme Court Ruling:
  The Supreme Court overturned Brandenburg's conviction, finding that the Ohio law violated his First Amendment right to free speech.
  • The speech must be "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action".
  • Google.

Did he call for NOT doing that shit? After all, he supports the thugs' proposition that Jews should be expunged from their own land.

It's like say, I claim to be a Nazi and talk about killing Jews. I protest and get other students to go along. They set fires and generally cause chaos. If you were an American of the Jewish faith, would that make you feel safe in your own country? After all those are ACTIONS supported by speech.

 

[buttercup]

Terrorist advocates…lol. That’s you Carl in Mecca.

 

[Leo123]

I've supplied my view, and the court decisions that support it, and the Constitutional basis for allowing him to protest.

All you do is repeat "Is not, is not, isssssssss noooooottttttttttttt!!!!?"

I worry when there are immature individuals like you on our side. So very much like the Brown Shirts of an earlier time.

If I had compared you to Lavrentiy Beria, would you have known who I was talking about?

I don't think a court case involving the domestic KKK has anything to do with this. Your tacit inference of people who support the deportation of terrorist supporters as 'Brown Shirts' is insulting, stupid and rude. Whoever you are.

 

[Robert W]

I checked to see if it was reported that he incited the taking over of a building on campus.....see if you can find any.


If you can't.....the Supremes already decided:


In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the Supreme Court established the "imminent lawless action" test, limiting government restrictions on speech to cases where it is both directed at inciting imminent violence and likely to produce such action.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• The Case:
  Clarence Brandenburg, a Ku Klux Klan leader, was convicted under an Ohio law that prohibited advocating for violence or crime.
  
  
• The Ohio Law:
  The law, known as the Criminal Syndicalism Act, made it a crime to advocate for violence or crime as a means of political reform.
  
  
• The Supreme Court Ruling:
  The Supreme Court overturned Brandenburg's conviction, finding that the Ohio law violated his First Amendment right to free speech.
  • The speech must be "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action".
  • Google.

Was that the same Supreme Court who ruled in favor of Roe v Wade that a modern Supreme Court overturned?

 

[Leo123]

View attachment 1091336

Really stupid cartoon there BC. It's over generalized with no details or facts. Criticizing is different than supporting terrorists and standing by while students, who believe what you say, turn violent and cause chaos. How is it you cannot seem to understand the difference?

 

[Foxfyre]

He will be deported for two reasons:

The powers that be want him out

and

not all of us are strong enough to resist the powers when they are wrong.


Where are you?

Again I am not at all convinced you are PC at all. So uncharacteristic of you to be intellectually dishonest which you are every time you mischaracterize my arguments. I won't repeat my arguments that you have persistently dismissed. Also not characteristic of PC.

 

[Robert W]

View attachment 1091336

First he has not been deported. Second he engaged as the leader of the group that vandalized a University campus building.


In April 2024, pro-Palestinian protesters, including members of organizations like Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) and other activist groups, damaged Columbia University buildings, including Hamilton Hall and the home of the university president, during protests over the war in Gaza.

Here's a more detailed breakdown:

• Protests and Demands:
  Pro-Palestinian protesters, who were demanding divestment, financial transparency, and amnesty, barricaded themselves inside Hamilton Hall and renamed it "Hind's Hall," after a young girl killed in Gaza.
  
  • Hamilton Hall: Protesters damaged Hamilton Hall, including breaking doors, and overturned tables and chairs.
    
    
  • Home of the President: Vandals splashed the historic residence of Columbia University's president with red paint and scrawled the words "Free Them All".
    
    
  • Other Buildings: Other activist groups, including CUAD, also targeted the Henry R. Kravis Hall and the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) buildings, with incidents including spray-painting and flushing cement down toilets.
    
• University Response:
  Columbia University condemned the vandalism and stated that such acts were acts of destruction, not political speech.