BREAKING: Columbia anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil can be deported, judge rules

[whitehall]

Freaking A. If the federal government doesn't have the power to revoke the visa of a trouble maker we might as well give up the visa system but we can't do that because the dirty little secret is that institutes of higher learning like Harvard rely on commie infiltrators and foreign spies disguised as students who pay full tuition without complaint. Visa students are a source of revenue.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Mahmoud Khalil faces deportation for his role in Columbia University campus protests against Israel

A judge has ruled that Mahmoud Khalil, a University of Columbia student accused of fomenting unrest and violence in the guise of anti Israel protests can be deported. I will note that this case is likely to be appealed and may reach the Supreme Court.

Columbia anti-Israel protester Mahmoud Khalil can be deported, judge rules

An immigration judge has ruled that Mahmoud Khalil can be deported from the U.S. due to his involvement in leading last year’s pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University.

www.foxnews.com

/—-/ democRATs lose another voter.

 

[JoeB131]

Due process of Law : applying the facts to his case:

1- it was the custodial parent's decision to raise him as a freeman in the US
2- He arrived on Florida - US Soil

1) Her decision became moot when she slept with the fishes.
2) But his boat never arrived. At the time, there was a wet feet/dry feet provision. Cubans found at sea were returned, Cubans who made it to land could stay.

3- the law at the time prevented Cuban Nationals from being deported;U.S. Border Patrol Deputy Chief Mike Sheehy said Elián and the two other survivors "would be offered the opportunity to reside here in the United States because under the law in effect then There was no provision to remove Cuban nationals to Cuba.

The other two survivors were adults.

4- Minors are allowed to apply for asylum by themselves

Only if there is no parent in the picture.

5-- The Miami_Dade County Court granted his relatives CUSTODY over him ;

Meaningless. Once his father asserted his rights, he had priority.

-- INS attorney Rebeca Sánchez-Roig admitted that Elian's father requested an immigrant visa at the U.S. Interests Section in Havana - he was coerced by Fidel to deny that he wanted to come to the US

Meaningless again.

7- There is NO FEDERAL STATUTE WHICH REQUIRES THAT BIOLOGICAL PARENTS ACQUIRE AUTOMATIC CUSTODY - NONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No, but you have to prove a compelling reason to not return a child, and they couldn't provide one.

8- INS Whistleblower Diana Alvarez claimed that the Miami INS office had a huge anti-Cuban bias and that INS Commissioner wanted all records showing that Elian Gonzalez's father attempted to migrate to the US destroyed.

So no actual records that he wanted to immigrate, just some "whistleblower" (i.e. someone who got fired) claiming so.

ANd those are the FACTS that Slick Willy should had considered . Instead he used Elian as a peon in geopolitical affairs in order to grandstand for his commie friend

Oh, I'm sure that Slick Willy's concern was he didn't want Fidel opening his jails and insane asylums like he did in 1979 to poor Jimmy Carter. Still doesn't mean the ruling was in the wrong.

His father's claim was better than his distant cousins.

Haha ok, so all these illegals that brought their kids with them here should be considered negligent parents as well?

If they endangered their lives, maybe.

 

[JoeB131]

Freaking A. If the federal government doesn't have the power to revoke the visa of a trouble maker we might as well give up the visa system but we can't do that because the dirty little secret is that institutes of higher learning like Harvard rely on commie infiltrators and foreign spies disguised as students who pay full tuition without complaint. Visa students are a source of revenue.

Except he wasn't on a student VISA at that point, he was on a marriage visa.

He is married to a US citizen. Absent any actual crime, there's no good reason to deport him.

 

[krichton]

Your antisemitism is clouding reality. A country capable of killing all Palestinians within a week after the barbaric massacre of Jews on 10/7 does not drop flyers warning the Jew-haters to leave an area, and leave 99.5% of civilians ALIVE after 20 months.

And believe me, I know you are hoping Israel will be ostracized, and you care more about a Muslim foreigner spewing his lies than the Jewish victims of the hate he is spewing, but then again….you’re a Democrat and tolerate hate crimes against a minority IF AND ONLY IF THEY ARE JEWS.

And the only reason the Islamic savages do NOT kill thousands of Jews overnight is because they are incapable of it. But they have said their goal is to repeat 10/7 until all the Jews are dead.

WHERE is your condemnation of the genocide against whites in SA? What about the Rohingya Muslims? Nope. Nothing. You’re only interested if there’s a way you can twist things around to blame the Jews.

If you want a response, capitalize “Jews”. The lower-case is a dead giveaway.

No, this is what you do. It is actually your own racism you're talking about. That's what fuels every single race baiting post you reply with and it's as clear as day.

Dropping flyers to leave an area and directing them to "safe zones" and then immediately targeting those same safe zones for airstrikes is just plain evil. If you support this, then you know what you are.

Absolutely, but only until the war criminal Netanyahu is ousted and brought to justice for his war crimes, along with his generals.

There is no genocide of whites in south Africa, and this is precisely what i was talking about earlier. You'll drop the word, "genocide" whenever it suits you, even if just 36 farmers are killed, but 60,000 dead Palestinian civilians? Naahhh. You're literally the most shameless racist on here.

 

[krichton]

You might want to read it again.

The court said he merely had to facilitate the return not go get him

I guess it's time to move the goalposts. First it was, there was no such order by the federal court, or the supreme court. Now it's time to play childish semantics around the word "facilitate." You and I both know what this means. Why do you think the president should be above the law and ignore the courts?

 

[struth]

I guess it's time to move the goalposts. First it was, there was no such order by the federal court, or the supreme court. Now it's time to play childish semantics around the word "facilitate." You and I both know what this means. Why do you think the president should be above the law and ignore the courts?

I am not playing semantics. Words have meaning. He was never ordered to bring him back

 

[Lisa558]

No, this is what you do. It is actually your own racism you're talking about. That's what fuels every single race baiting post you reply with and it's as clear as day.

Dropping flyers to leave an area and directing them to "safe zones" and then immediately targeting those same safe zones for airstrikes is just plain evil. If you support this, then you know what you are.

Absolutely, but only until the war criminal Netanyahu is ousted and brought to justice for his war crimes, along with his generals.

There is no genocide of whites in south Africa, and this is precisely what i was talking about earlier. You'll drop the word, "genocide" whenever it suits you, even if just 36 farmers are killed, but 60,000 dead Palestinian civilians? Naahhh. You're literally the most shameless racist on here.

No genocide of whites by blacks, but genocide of Muslims by Jews?

(another anti-white, antisemitic leftist.)

 

[JoeB131]

No genocide of whites by blacks, but genocide of Muslims by Jews?

(another anti-white, antisemitic leftist.)

Um, how many former white oppressors are being killed in South Africa? According to the South African Government, it's only about 50 a year.

Meanwhile, the Zionists have kiled about 50,000 people in Gaza.

Um, yes, only one of these is a genocide.

But it's okay if you do it, amiright?

 

[Contumacious]

1) Her decision became moot when she slept with the fishes.
2) But his boat never arrived. At the time, there was a wet feet/dry feet provision. Cubans found at sea were returned, Cubans who made it to land could stay.



The other two survivors were adults.



Only if there is no parent in the picture.



Meaningless. Once his father asserted his rights, he had priority.



Meaningless again.



No, but you have to prove a compelling reason to not return a child, and they couldn't provide one.



So no actual records that he wanted to immigrate, just some "whistleblower" (i.e. someone who got fired) claiming so.



Oh, I'm sure that Slick Willy's concern was he didn't want Fidel opening his jails and insane asylums like he did in 1979 to poor Jimmy Carter. Still doesn't mean the ruling was in the wrong.

His father's claim was better than his distant cousins.



If they endangered their lives, maybe.

Firstly, the law at the time prevented Cuban Nationals from being deported;>>>>>>>>>>U.S. Border Patrol Deputy Chief Mike Sheehy said Elián and the two other survivors "would be offered the opportunity to reside here in the United States because under the law in effect then There was no provision to remove Cuban nationals to Cuba.]<<<<<<<<<

Are you saying that Mike Sheehy didn't know what he was talking about ?

Secondly . Immigration Law clearly stated :

Minor and Unaccompanied Child Asylum Applicants
You may apply for asylum with USCIS as a minor if you:

• Are under 18 years old;
• Want to have your own case separate from your parents;

(7) No, but you have to prove a compelling reason to not return a child, and they couldn't provide one.


WHICH FEDERAL STATUTE , or binding case law precedent, required that a FEDERAL COURT find a "compelling" reason for not returning a child to a slave state ?!?!?!?!?!??!??

 

[JoeB131]

Firstly, the law at the time prevented Cuban Nationals from being deported;>

No, it didn't. Not that it mattered, the return of Elian wasn't a deportation matter, it was a parental custody matter.

His father was his closest living relative. End of story.

 

[Contumacious]

No, it didn't. Not that it mattered, the return of Elian wasn't a deportation matter, it was a parental custody matter.

His father was his closest living relative. End of story.

PURE UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT .

The Miami-Dade County Judge set a hearing for Juan Miguel Gonzalez to present any objections to the order granting custody to Elian's Miami relatives.

But slick willy wanted to grandstand for Fidel Castro , the communist SOB. Little Elian was the peon.