Remember Who We Are

[HeyNorm]

Let's check:

If this individual, a legal resident, was rallying people to support Trump, capitalism, anti-abortion, or any of the other areas in which you and I are in agreement, and he riled up the people......would you want him jailed or deported.


See what I mean about feellings?


We need to support the Constitution, not one political or religious view or another.

………for months at a time while forwarding the idea that the citizens of that community should be killed?

Fixed it for you.

Oh, and not be CITIZENS.

SO HAPPY I CAN HELP YA.

 

[Foxfyre]

Let's check:

If this individual, a legal resident, was rallying people to support Trump, capitalism, anti-abortion, or any of the other areas in which you and I are in agreement, and he riled up the people......would you want him jailed or deported.


See what I mean about feellings?


We need to support the Constitution, not one political or religious view or another.

Nothing I have argued had anything to do with Trump, capitalism, anti-abortion etc. Nor has it had anything to do with anti-Trump sentiment, pronouns, pro-abortion, etc. Or free speech.

It has everything to do a non citizen violating the rights of U.S. citizens and being officially a national security risk.

Would you care to comment on that and why you seem to think that doesn't matter?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

IF it were moot, you wouldn't be coming back.

Our side should not simply replicate theirs when we are in power.

We don't. The far left agrees with you

 

[PoliticalChic]

………for months at a time while forwarding the idea that the citizens of that community should be killed?

Fixed it for you.

Oh, and not be CITIZENS.

SO HAPPY I CAN HELP YA.

America is based on God-given rights.
Free speech is one.

So you're not American?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nothing I have argued had anything to do with Trump, capitalism, anti-abortion etc. Nor has it had anything to do with anti-Trump sentiment, pronouns, pro-abortion, etc. Or free speech.

It has everything to do a non citizen violating the rights of U.S. citizens and being officially a national security risk.

Would you care to comment on that and why you seem to think that doesn't matter?

Is your animosity based on what he said?

I believe so.

 

[Leo123]

America is based on God-given rights.
Free speech is one.

So you're not American?

Inciting violence does not come under 'free speech' because it infringes on the rights of others.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nothing I have argued had anything to do with Trump, capitalism, anti-abortion etc. Nor has it had anything to do with anti-Trump sentiment, pronouns, pro-abortion, etc. Or free speech.

It has everything to do a non citizen violating the rights of U.S. citizens and being officially a national security risk.

Would you care to comment on that and why you seem to think that doesn't matter?

"...why you seem to think that doesn't matter?"

Sure.

AI Overview
Learn more

The concept of "God-given rights" in the context of the U.S. Constitution refers to the idea that certain fundamental rights, like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, are inherent to all individuals, not granted by the government, as articulated in the Declaration of Independence.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Inherent Rights:
  The Declaration of Independence states that all people are "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights".
  
  
• Unalienable Rights:
  These rights are considered "unalienable," meaning they cannot be taken away by any government or person.
  
  
• • Foundational Philosophy:
    The Founders believed that these natural rights, or "God-given rights," are inherent in all people by virtue of their being human.
  • Purpose of Government:
    The government, according to this view, exists to protect these rights, not to grant them.
  • Examples:
    Examples of these rights include freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to due process, and the right to a fair trial.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We don't. The far left agrees with you

You do. So, you're not on "our side"????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Inciting violence does not come under 'free speech' because it infringes on the rights of others.

Is he being charged with that?

If he is not, will you agree that he should not be punished for speech?


AI Overview
Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate, was arrested by ICE and faces deportation after leading pro-Palestinian protests, including those demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and divestment from Israel. .... he was arrested because he "led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization".

 

[Care4all]

Yeah, did you notice?

"you can.. APPLY ..."

As it is for every person seeking naturalization with a green card.....nothing to notice???

 

[PoliticalChic]

Disappointing that a number of people who voted for Trump don't understand what they voted for. We aimed to put America back on the footing that made it great.....and be great again.
And what we voted against were things like depriving folks of their rights.

God-given rights.

Perhaps you recall this:
AI Overview
Learn more

The phrase "he has smiled on our endeavors" translates to "Annuit Coeptis" in Latin, a motto on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States, meaning "He [God] has favored our undertakings".

 

[Leo123]

Is he being charged with that?

If he is not, will you agree that he should not be punished for speech?


AI Overview
Mahmoud Khalil, a Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate, was arrested by ICE and faces deportation after leading pro-Palestinian protests, including those demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and divestment from Israel. .... he was arrested because he "led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization".

"Secretary of State Marco Rubio has initiated removal efforts for Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestinian activist, by citing Section 237(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which denotes individuals whose presence poses serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States as deportable."

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Secretary of State Marco Rubio has initiated removal efforts for Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestinian activist, by citing Section 237(a)(4)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which denotes individuals whose presence poses serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States as deportable."

An administration can claim all sorts of things.....but you are allowed to decide if what they say aligns with reality.


Khalil is a threat to our foreign policy?

Can you explain that?


Don't be like the Democrats we voted against, and feel you must march lock step with the party.


We don't have to give up our right to question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let’s go over the law structure of the United States.

One “law” predominates every other one.



The Constitution is known as ‘the law of the land.’

The U.S. Constitution calls itself the "supreme law of the land." This clause is taken to mean that when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.
The Constitution as Supreme Law
http://www.let.rug.nl › usa › outlines › government-1991




The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.


Do we agree about that?

 

[Leo123]

An administration can claim all sorts of things.....but you are allowed to decide if what they say aligns with reality.


Khalil is a threat to our foreign policy?

Can you explain that?


Don't be like the Democrats we voted against, and feel you must march lock step with the party.


We don't have to give up our right to question.

He supports the terrorist cult HAMAS which is a direct threat to our foreign policy with Israel.

 

[Leo123]

Let’s go over the law structure of the United States.

One “law” predominates every other one.



The Constitution is known as ‘the law of the land.’

The U.S. Constitution calls itself the "supreme law of the land." This clause is taken to mean that when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.
The Constitution as Supreme Law
http://www.let.rug.nl › usa › outlines › government-1991




The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.


Do we agree about that?

Where in the Constitution does it say we have to support terrorists or those who support them?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

America is based on God-given rights.
Free speech is one.

So you're not American?

Again with the free speech lie

Do you think "free speech" meant threatening an innocent segment of American citizens to the Founders?

 

[HeyNorm]

America is based on God-given rights.
Free speech is one.

So you're not American?

Apparently more than you.

The President has not only the obligation, but the duty to protect AMERICAN CITIZENS.

But you wouldn’t hear of that, huh comrade?

 

[HeyNorm]

Again with the free speech lie

Do you think "free speech" meant threatening an innocent segment of American citizens to the Founders?

This has been explained dozens of times.

The deaf refuse to hear.

 

[Foxfyre]

"...why you seem to think that doesn't matter?"

Sure.

AI Overview
Learn more

The concept of "God-given rights" in the context of the U.S. Constitution refers to the idea that certain fundamental rights, like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, are inherent to all individuals, not granted by the government, as articulated in the Declaration of Independence.

Here's a more detailed explanation:

• Inherent Rights:
  The Declaration of Independence states that all people are "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights".
  
  
• Unalienable Rights:
  These rights are considered "unalienable," meaning they cannot be taken away by any government or person.
  
  
• • Foundational Philosophy:
    The Founders believed that these natural rights, or "God-given rights," are inherent in all people by virtue of their being human.
  • Purpose of Government:
    The government, according to this view, exists to protect these rights, not to grant them.
  • Examples:
    Examples of these rights include freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to due process, and the right to a fair trial.

Violation of none of these will be be the reason Khalil will be deported. He is not being denied his right to due process. But you seem to be unable to grasp that concept.

I am seriously beginning to believe it is not PoliticalChic writing now. Not her writing style. And certainly 100% contrary to how she normally thinks and processes information.