- Sep 9, 2022
- 25,907
- 12,639
- 1,288
Sounds like you suffer from stockholms syndrome.The British had no right to do that.
In fact, the British has promised the Arabs independence if they revolted against the Ottomans.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like you suffer from stockholms syndrome.The British had no right to do that.
In fact, the British has promised the Arabs independence if they revolted against the Ottomans.
It sounds like you suffer from Stockholm Syndrome.FUckwad, we have 30 Trillion in debt because Ronnie Ray-Gun decided to cut rich people's taxes, not because of "Crisis Actors".
Supply side doesn't work. It never did. You guys keep pretending it does, and then you whine about the debt that was MOSTLY run up by Republicans.
Bullcrap. Tax revenues went up, they always do. "FUckwad, we have 30 Trillion in debt because Ronnie Ray-Gun decided to cut rich people's taxes, not because of "Crisis Actors".
Supply side doesn't work. It never did. You guys keep pretending it does, and then you whine about the debt that was MOSTLY run up by Republicans.
I used that quote to reply to you twice today.Wow, it sounds like you and most of the wingnuts here suffer from Stockholm Syndrome.
Also President Kennedy a Democrat went to war with taxes and cut them by a hell of a lot. Democrats don't mind that though.Bullcrap. Tax revenues went up, they always do. "
The Reagan tax cuts
Thanks to "bracket creep," the inflation of the 1970s pushed millions of taxpayers into higher tax brackets even though their inflation-adjusted incomes were not rising. To help offset this tax increase and also to improve incentives to work, save, and invest, President Reagan proposed sweeping tax rate reductions during the 1980s. What happened? Total tax revenues climbed by 99.4 percent during the 1980s, and the results are even more impressive when looking at what happened to personal income tax revenues. Once the economy received an unambiguous tax cut in January 1983, income tax revenues climbed dramatically, increasing by more than 54 percent by 1989 (28 percent after adjusting for inflation)."
"...
Federal revenue didn’t fall after the big Trump administration tax cuts, much less by $2 trillion. Instead, total revenue rose. In fact, after trimming the rates for five of the seven brackets and nearly doubling the standard deduction, the government collected nearly $100 billion more in personal income tax revenue for the year ended Sept. 30, 2018. That was the biggest jump in three years.
The conventional wisdom in media, political and policymaking circles is that tax cuts cost the government so much revenue that they drive the country’s enormous budget deficits, but this isn’t true. After President George W. Bush’s 2003 tax cuts, revenue rose for the next four years, with the deficit shrinking to as little as $161 billion in fiscal 2007. After the 1986 Reagan tax reform, which cut the top personal income tax rate from 50% to 28% and lowered the rates for other brackets, the deficit plummeted 32% the next year and stayed at that low level for another two years while revenue rose dramatically for three straight years."
The democratic party of the sixties resembles the republican party of today. Republicans have moved towards the center while the democrats have moved far left.Also President Kennedy a Democrat went to war with taxes and cut them by a hell of a lot. Democrats don't mind that though.
How is Chicago doing under perpetual Democratic rule? No need to answer. We already know.
The democratic party of the sixties resembles the republican party of today. Republicans have moved towards the center while the democrats have moved far left.