Religious Right Wing Bigots Still Obsessing About Marriage-Get a Life!

[The Purge]

Was it difficult posting that with one hand?

It is from his private collection

why not just come out of your closet and ask for a copy?

Have you always been obsessed with gay porn?

So you are obsessed with gsy porn....figures ABNORMAL!

 

[G.T.]

Is it anyones fault but your own that you dont understand what arbitrary means?

It was determined that basing it on "gender roles," and gender roles themselves, are arbitrary.

Theyre abstract.

Theyre not concrete things that literally exist.

The Courts determined that since its arbitrary to base something on a thing so abstract, the only other reason to deny two consenting adults from the same state institution would be bigotry, which converted it to a civil rights issue and Correll is an idiot. A bigotted one.

Dear G.T. and Correll

1. Clearly GENETIC gender is DIFFERENT from INTERNAL identity which is the faith based arbitrary part.
You can't PROVE someone's faith based INTERNAL choice which is part of their personal space, not for Govt to regulate.

But for SECULAR laws, just like laws determining if legal identity starts at BIRTH,
we have to AGREE on a LEGAL DEFINITION.

2. Up to this point, we based BOTH the "gender" and "human life"
AT BIRTH, to have an agreed scientific definition to use for LEGAL purposes and PUBLIC standards.

G.T. I love you, man, but the more you push for
ARBITRARY FAITH BASED internal identity (which are NOT GOVERNMENT's BLOODY BUSINESS TO BEGIN WITH)
you and other liberals OPEN THE DOOR for all the
Christian beliefs about determining life on FAITH BASED CRITERIA
to be made into laws, if YOU are going to push for that, too.

If we open the door for ONE CREED to start pushing BELIEFS through GOVT
then ALL CREEDS need to have equal access and treatment

G.T. you and I both agree and make it clear
this is NOT what we want.

So if we don't want Christians pushing faith based beliefs through Govt at our expense,
nor can we justify pushing LGBT faith based beliefs into public policy either.

However, G.T. if you insist on including LGBT beliefs in public schools and policies,
then be prepared for Christian beliefs to demand equal inclusion for their creeds as well.
It's only lawful to treat people equally, instead of discriminating on the basis of creed.

You dont get to call me liberal without having a conversation about my politics. Youve overstepped your bounds there.

Gay marriage IS equal access. Get over it. Newsflash..christians can marry too.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Is it anyones fault but your own that you dont understand what arbitrary means?

It was determined that basing it on "gender roles," and gender roles themselves, are arbitrary.

Theyre abstract.

Theyre not concrete things that literally exist.

The Courts determined that since its arbitrary to base something on a thing so abstract, the only other reason to deny two consenting adults from the same state institution would be bigotry, which converted it to a civil rights issue and Correll is an idiot. A bigotted one.

Dear G.T. and Correll

1. Clearly GENETIC gender is DIFFERENT from INTERNAL identity which is the faith based arbitrary part.
You can't PROVE someone's faith based INTERNAL choice which is part of their personal space, not for Govt to regulate.

But for SECULAR laws, just like laws determining if legal identity starts at BIRTH,
we have to AGREE on a LEGAL DEFINITION.

2. Up to this point, we based BOTH the "gender" and "human life"
AT BIRTH, to have an agreed scientific definition to use for LEGAL purposes and PUBLIC standards.

G.T. I love you, man, but the more you push for
ARBITRARY FAITH BASED internal identity (which are NOT GOVERNMENT's BLOODY BUSINESS TO BEGIN WITH)
you and other liberals OPEN THE DOOR for all the
Christian beliefs about determining life on FAITH BASED CRITERIA
to be made into laws, if YOU are going to push for that, too.

If we open the door for ONE CREED to start pushing BELIEFS through GOVT
then ALL CREEDS need to have equal access and treatment

G.T. you and I both agree and make it clear
this is NOT what we want.

So if we don't want Christians pushing faith based beliefs through Govt at our expense,
nor can we justify pushing LGBT faith based beliefs into public policy either.

However, G.T. if you insist on including LGBT beliefs in public schools and policies,
then be prepared for Christian beliefs to demand equal inclusion for their creeds as well.
It's only lawful to treat people equally, instead of discriminating on the basis of creed.

You dont get to call me liberal without having a conversation about my politics. Youve overstepped your bounds there.

Gay marriage IS equal access. Get over it. Newsflash..christians can marry too.

More of her inane convoluted and bizarre horseshit about how everyone can and should be accommodated and that being gay or trans is a " belief " equal to religious beliefs.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Here is another far right wing nut who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

In a commentary for The Daily Signal, the Heritage Foundation’s “news” operation, Anderson draws from his book “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom,” to argue that the law should enforce a “conjugal” view of marriage as opposed to a “consent-based” view:

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Anderson, an intellectual protégé of Princeton’s anti-equality scholar and activist Robert George, portrays himself as a civility-minded promoter of a “live and let live” ethos. As such, he doesn’t generally appear alongside blatantly anti-LGBTQ folks like Peter LaBarbera, who protested against marriage equality at the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Give me a fucking break!

 

[miketx]

Here is another far right wing not who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

In a commentary for The Daily Signal, the Heritage Foundation’s “news” operation, Anderson draws from his book “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom,” to argue that the law should enforce a “conjugal” view of marriage as opposed to a “consent-based” view:

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Anderson, an intellectual protégé of Princeton’s anti-equality scholar and activist Robert George, portrays himself as a civility-minded promoter of a “live and let live” ethos. As such, he doesn’t generally appear alongside blatantly anti-LGBTQ folks like Peter LaBarbera, who protested against marriage equality at the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Give me a fucking break!

Yeah man! They just want to be left alone and live their lives and do what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. That's why they have disgusting parades where they show everyone and children what they do in their bedrooms.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Here is another far right wing not who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

In a commentary for The Daily Signal, the Heritage Foundation’s “news” operation, Anderson draws from his book “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom,” to argue that the law should enforce a “conjugal” view of marriage as opposed to a “consent-based” view:

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Anderson, an intellectual protégé of Princeton’s anti-equality scholar and activist Robert George, portrays himself as a civility-minded promoter of a “live and let live” ethos. As such, he doesn’t generally appear alongside blatantly anti-LGBTQ folks like Peter LaBarbera, who protested against marriage equality at the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Give me a fucking break!

Yeah man! They just want to be left alone and live their lives and do what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. That's why they have disgusting parades where they show everyone and children what they do in their bedrooms.

Yes of course! This is to be expected. When you people can't come up with anything relevant or intelligent to say, you invoke those raunchy gay pride parades, or but sex, or what ever disparaging horseshit you can come you with.

Now let me ask you this? When and where was the most recent gay pride event where there was inappropriate sexual acting out on a large scale. Yes , in the past gays were militant and engaged in shock tactics because, like any downtrodden minority they had to call attention to their plight. Now that they have achieved a level of respect and legitimacy, that sort of thing is no longer necessary.

 

[miketx]

Here is another far right wing not who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

In a commentary for The Daily Signal, the Heritage Foundation’s “news” operation, Anderson draws from his book “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom,” to argue that the law should enforce a “conjugal” view of marriage as opposed to a “consent-based” view:

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Anderson, an intellectual protégé of Princeton’s anti-equality scholar and activist Robert George, portrays himself as a civility-minded promoter of a “live and let live” ethos. As such, he doesn’t generally appear alongside blatantly anti-LGBTQ folks like Peter LaBarbera, who protested against marriage equality at the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Give me a fucking break!

Yeah man! They just want to be left alone and live their lives and do what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. That's why they have disgusting parades where they show everyone and children what they do in their bedrooms.

Yes of course! This is to be expected. When you people can't come up with anything relevant or intelligent to say, you invoke those raunchy gay pride parades, or but sex, or what ever disparaging horseshit you can come you with.

Now let me ask you this? When and where was the most recent gay pride event where there was inappropriate sexual acting out on a large scale. Yes , in the past gays were militant and engaged in shock tactics because, like any downtrodden minority they had to call attention to their plight. Now that they have achieved a level of respect and legitimacy, that sort of thing is no longer necessary.

And yet that's exactly what you perverts do!

 

[emilynghiem]

Here is another far right wing not who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

In a commentary for The Daily Signal, the Heritage Foundation’s “news” operation, Anderson draws from his book “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom,” to argue that the law should enforce a “conjugal” view of marriage as opposed to a “consent-based” view:

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Anderson, an intellectual protégé of Princeton’s anti-equality scholar and activist Robert George, portrays himself as a civility-minded promoter of a “live and let live” ethos. As such, he doesn’t generally appear alongside blatantly anti-LGBTQ folks like Peter LaBarbera, who protested against marriage equality at the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Give me a fucking break!

Yeah man! They just want to be left alone and live their lives and do what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. That's why they have disgusting parades where they show everyone and children what they do in their bedrooms.

Yes of course! This is to be expected. When you people can't come up with anything relevant or intelligent to say, you invoke those raunchy gay pride parades, or but sex, or what ever disparaging horseshit you can come you with.

Now let me ask you this? When and where was the most recent gay pride event where there was inappropriate sexual acting out on a large scale. Yes , in the past gays were militant and engaged in shock tactics because, like any downtrodden minority they had to call attention to their plight. Now that they have achieved a level of respect and legitimacy, that sort of thing is no longer necessary.

Dear TheProgressivePatriot

If you don't like rightwing opponents labeling ALL LGBT members as perverts, then don't make generalizations either that all rightwing opposed to incorporating "same sex marriage" in state laws are "bigots."

You remind me of someone who hates hornets so much
they go out and stir the nest. And wonder why you get stung.

You know my position: If you want people to keep their beliefs
out of govt, then you have to respect the same standards.

If you want to interject YOUR LGBT beliefs into govt,
then be prepared for others interjecting their beliefs equally.

You get what you give.

I'm not making this up, that's just the laws of human nature,
karma, cause and effect.

Whatever beliefs you project and impose on others,
they will defend their beliefs to the same degree.

If you don't like them doing that to you,
don't do it to them. That's how justice works.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Government Over Reach "

* Limits Of Private Health Information *

Oh Christ! Seriously?? This is really stupid but I'll play. Then what about a woman who has had a hysterectomy ?

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act - Wikipedia

 

[Terri4Trump]

... raunchy gay pride parades.....

And you are the head cock gobbler, assmaster of ceremonies. LOL

 

[Lysistrata]

Is it anyones fault but your own that you dont understand what arbitrary means?

It was determined that basing it on "gender roles," and gender roles themselves, are arbitrary.

Theyre abstract.

Theyre not concrete things that literally exist.

The Courts determined that since its arbitrary to base something on a thing so abstract, the only other reason to deny two consenting adults from the same state institution would be bigotry, which converted it to a civil rights issue and Correll is an idiot. A bigotted one.

Dear G.T. and Correll

1. Clearly GENETIC gender is DIFFERENT from INTERNAL identity which is the faith based arbitrary part.
You can't PROVE someone's faith based INTERNAL choice which is part of their personal space, not for Govt to regulate.

But for SECULAR laws, just like laws determining if legal identity starts at BIRTH,
we have to AGREE on a LEGAL DEFINITION.

2. Up to this point, we based BOTH the "gender" and "human life"
AT BIRTH, to have an agreed scientific definition to use for LEGAL purposes and PUBLIC standards.

G.T. I love you, man, but the more you push for
ARBITRARY FAITH BASED internal identity (which are NOT GOVERNMENT's BLOODY BUSINESS TO BEGIN WITH)
you and other liberals OPEN THE DOOR for all the
Christian beliefs about determining life on FAITH BASED CRITERIA
to be made into laws, if YOU are going to push for that, too.

If we open the door for ONE CREED to start pushing BELIEFS through GOVT
then ALL CREEDS need to have equal access and treatment

G.T. you and I both agree and make it clear
this is NOT what we want.

So if we don't want Christians pushing faith based beliefs through Govt at our expense,
nor can we justify pushing LGBT faith based beliefs into public policy either.

However, G.T. if you insist on including LGBT beliefs in public schools and policies,
then be prepared for Christian beliefs to demand equal inclusion for their creeds as well.
It's only lawful to treat people equally, instead of discriminating on the basis of creed.

You dont get to call me liberal without having a conversation about my politics. Youve overstepped your bounds there.

Gay marriage IS equal access. Get over it. Newsflash..christians can marry too.

And LGBTQs who are Christians can marry, too!

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Here is another far right wing not who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

In a commentary for The Daily Signal, the Heritage Foundation’s “news” operation, Anderson draws from his book “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom,” to argue that the law should enforce a “conjugal” view of marriage as opposed to a “consent-based” view:

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Anderson, an intellectual protégé of Princeton’s anti-equality scholar and activist Robert George, portrays himself as a civility-minded promoter of a “live and let live” ethos. As such, he doesn’t generally appear alongside blatantly anti-LGBTQ folks like Peter LaBarbera, who protested against marriage equality at the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Give me a fucking break!

Yeah man! They just want to be left alone and live their lives and do what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. That's why they have disgusting parades where they show everyone and children what they do in their bedrooms.

Yes of course! This is to be expected. When you people can't come up with anything relevant or intelligent to say, you invoke those raunchy gay pride parades, or but sex, or what ever disparaging horseshit you can come you with.

Now let me ask you this? When and where was the most recent gay pride event where there was inappropriate sexual acting out on a large scale. Yes , in the past gays were militant and engaged in shock tactics because, like any downtrodden minority they had to call attention to their plight. Now that they have achieved a level of respect and legitimacy, that sort of thing is no longer necessary.

And yet that's exactly what you perverts do!

Is that supposed to be an answer?? Pathetic indeed!!

 

[miketx]

Here is another far right wing not who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

In a commentary for The Daily Signal, the Heritage Foundation’s “news” operation, Anderson draws from his book “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom,” to argue that the law should enforce a “conjugal” view of marriage as opposed to a “consent-based” view:

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Anderson, an intellectual protégé of Princeton’s anti-equality scholar and activist Robert George, portrays himself as a civility-minded promoter of a “live and let live” ethos. As such, he doesn’t generally appear alongside blatantly anti-LGBTQ folks like Peter LaBarbera, who protested against marriage equality at the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Give me a fucking break!

Yeah man! They just want to be left alone and live their lives and do what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. That's why they have disgusting parades where they show everyone and children what they do in their bedrooms.

Yes of course! This is to be expected. When you people can't come up with anything relevant or intelligent to say, you invoke those raunchy gay pride parades, or but sex, or what ever disparaging horseshit you can come you with.

Now let me ask you this? When and where was the most recent gay pride event where there was inappropriate sexual acting out on a large scale. Yes , in the past gays were militant and engaged in shock tactics because, like any downtrodden minority they had to call attention to their plight. Now that they have achieved a level of respect and legitimacy, that sort of thing is no longer necessary.

And yet that's exactly what you perverts do!

Is that supposed to be an answer?? Pathetic indeed!!

Yes queer it was,

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

" Government Over Reach "

* Limits Of Private Health Information *

Oh Christ! Seriously?? This is really stupid but I'll play. Then what about a woman who has had a hysterectomy ?

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act - Wikipedia

Oh for fucking Christ sake! What is this now? I know all about HIPPA . I gave trainings on HIPPA as an HR person for a state agency. I asked if a woman who has had a hysterectomy should be allowed to marry as a philosophical question. Let me rephrase. You contend that " reproduction" or the ability and willingness to have children should be a condition for marriage. The question then is -should anyone-any couple who is unable or unwilling to have children " in the usual way" be allowed to marry? Stop playing stupid games.

Another question that does not involve medical privacy. Should the marriage of a couple who does not produce a child in a certain amount of time for whatever reason be annulled?

And yet another. Is a child produced by a same sex couple-or any couple- by surrogacy or sperm donner any less valued that a child that resulted from heterosexual one on one sex? Answer the fucking questions!

 

[miketx]

" Government Over Reach "

* Limits Of Private Health Information *

Oh Christ! Seriously?? This is really stupid but I'll play. Then what about a woman who has had a hysterectomy ?

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act - Wikipedia

Oh for fucking Christ sake! What is this now? I know all about HIPPA . I gave trainings on HIPPA as an HR person for a state agency. I asked if a woman who has had a hysterectomy should be allowed to marry as a philosophical question. Let me rephrase. You contend that " reproduction" or the ability and willingness to have children should be a condition for marriage. The question then is -should anyone-any couple who is unable or unwilling to have children " in the usual way" be allowed to marry? Stop playing stupid games.

Another question that does not involve medical privacy. Should the marriage of a couple who does not produce a child in a certain amount of time for whatever reason be annulled?

And yet another. Is a child produced by a same sex couple-or any couple- by surrogacy or sperm donner any less valued that a child that resulted from heterosexual one on one sex? Answer the fucking questions!

Stop promoting the sickness of gays.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Here is another far right wing not who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Give me a fucking break!

Yeah man! They just want to be left alone and live their lives and do what they do in the privacy of their bedrooms. That's why they have disgusting parades where they show everyone and children what they do in their bedrooms.

Yes of course! This is to be expected. When you people can't come up with anything relevant or intelligent to say, you invoke those raunchy gay pride parades, or but sex, or what ever disparaging horseshit you can come you with.

Now let me ask you this? When and where was the most recent gay pride event where there was inappropriate sexual acting out on a large scale. Yes , in the past gays were militant and engaged in shock tactics because, like any downtrodden minority they had to call attention to their plight. Now that they have achieved a level of respect and legitimacy, that sort of thing is no longer necessary.

And yet that's exactly what you perverts do!

Is that supposed to be an answer?? Pathetic indeed!!

Yes queer it was,

Thank you for admitting and clearly demonstrating that you can't address the issue that I raised in a reasonable and articulate way

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

" Government Over Reach "

* Limits Of Private Health Information *

Oh Christ! Seriously?? This is really stupid but I'll play. Then what about a woman who has had a hysterectomy ?

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act - Wikipedia

Oh for fucking Christ sake! What is this now? I know all about HIPPA . I gave trainings on HIPPA as an HR person for a state agency. I asked if a woman who has had a hysterectomy should be allowed to marry as a philosophical question. Let me rephrase. You contend that " reproduction" or the ability and willingness to have children should be a condition for marriage. The question then is -should anyone-any couple who is unable or unwilling to have children " in the usual way" be allowed to marry? Stop playing stupid games.

Another question that does not involve medical privacy. Should the marriage of a couple who does not produce a child in a certain amount of time for whatever reason be annulled?

And yet another. Is a child produced by a same sex couple-or any couple- by surrogacy or sperm donner any less valued that a child that resulted from heterosexual one on one sex? Answer the fucking questions!

Stop promoting the sickness of gays.

Brilliant!! Just fucking brilliant ! Are you a 13 year old intellectually challenged special ed. drop out. ?? You sure sound like it!

 

[Dick Foster]

Here is another far right wing nut who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis who can't get past the same sex marriage issue and just leave people the fuck alone!

Heritage Foundation’s Ryan Anderson Insists Marriage Equality Must be Overturned | Right Wing Watch

In a commentary for The Daily Signal, the Heritage Foundation’s “news” operation, Anderson draws from his book “Truth Overruled: The Future of Marriage and Religious Freedom,” to argue that the law should enforce a “conjugal” view of marriage as opposed to a “consent-based” view:

And just who does that crazy ass think that he is to decide what marriage should be....for everyone!!?? Everyone has the right to decide what marriage is for themselves and only themselves. Here is some more of his crap:

Anderson, an intellectual protégé of Princeton’s anti-equality scholar and activist Robert George, portrays himself as a civility-minded promoter of a “live and let live” ethos. As such, he doesn’t generally appear alongside blatantly anti-LGBTQ folks like Peter LaBarbera, who protested against marriage equality at the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Give me a fucking break!

So at what point does everyone get to decide for themselves what law is or isn't pertinate to them? In order to maintain a society, there must be laws (rules) that everyone is required to obey. Like I've said before, I'm a live and let live type but I do tire of asshooes constantly whining and pushing the envelope then acting sanctimonious about it. If you werent out there contanstanty running your mouths about it, maybe you wouldn't get so much push back.

 

[rightwinger]

Was it difficult posting that with one hand?

It is from his private collection

why not just come out of your closet and ask for a copy?

Have you always been obsessed with gay porn?

So you are obsessed with gsy porn....figures ABNORMAL!

I know you are, but what am I?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Here is another far right wing nut who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis…

It's difficult to think of a better, more favorable endorsement of a man's intellectual and moral character, than for some morally-degenerate piece of perverted filth such as TheRegressivePervert to denounce him as a “far right wing nut who is apparently suffering from a religious psychosis”.