Real estate insiders bewildered by judge’s $18M valuation of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago: ‘Would list at $300M’

[progressive hunter]

Trump did testify for the case and defendants offered reasons for their valuations.

He wasn’t denied any rights.

You just never read the decision and are lying about it.

either provide his testimony or STFU,,,

as I said,, if this is all you have for a politically motivated prosecution you will have to do better for me to get concerned,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Trump did testify for the case and defendants offered reasons for their valuations.

He wasn’t denied any rights.

You just never read the decision and are lying about it.

another thing I would like to know is what the the defrauded party have to say in their complaint??

 

[Marener]

either provide his testimony or STFU,,,

as I said,, if this is all you have for a politically motivated prosecution you will have to do better for me to get concerned,,,

Part of the testimony is even quoted in the decision.

another thing I would like to know is what the the defrauded party have to say in their complaint??

Their opinion is irrelevant.

But you lied about Trump not having a chance to testify.

 

[progressive hunter]

Part of the testimony is even quoted in the decision.

Their opinion is irrelevant.

But you lied about Trump not having a chance to testify.

and since this is a civil case whats the dollar amount the defrauded are asking for in their complaint??

 

[WorldWatcher]

I asked for trial testimony,,,

Court rejects Donald Trump’s bid to delay trial in wake of fraud ruling that threatens his business

The decision clears the way for Judge Arthur Engoron to preside over a non-jury trial starting Monday in Manhattan in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ civil lawsuit.

apnews.com

It's part of the court record used by the Judge on summary judgement.

There was no trial on this item, Trump and the Prosecution both requested Summary Judgement.

One of the items is covered under the summary judgement. The Judge didn't rule on thoses, so the other items are still scheduled for trial.

Trump tried to delay the trial, but his attempt was rejected by the appeals level court. So it's on for Monday.

WW

 

[progressive hunter]

Court rejects Donald Trump’s bid to delay trial in wake of fraud ruling that threatens his business

The decision clears the way for Judge Arthur Engoron to preside over a non-jury trial starting Monday in Manhattan in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ civil lawsuit.

apnews.com

It's part of the court record used by the Judge on summary judgement.

There was no trial, Trump and the Prosecution both requested Summary Judgement.

One of the items is covered under the summary judgement. The other items are still scheduled for trial.

Trump tried to delay the trial, but his attempt was rejected by the appeals level court. So it's on for Monday.

WW

so they ruled him guilty before the trial even begins???

that doesnt sound right,,

 

[WorldWatcher]

so they ruled him guilty before the trial even begins???

that doesnt sound right,,

He asked for summary judgement and he got it.

Don't blame me that he didn't like the results.

WW

 

[progressive hunter]

He asked for summary judgement and he got it.

Don't blame me that he didn't like the results.

WW

he asked before they refused to allow his explanation,,,

 

[WorldWatcher]

he asked before they refused to allow his explanation,,,

They allowed his explanation. The court found it worthless.

You seem to be under the impression that the only information presented to the court is via in-person testimony at trial. That is incorrect, there are motions and evidence presented with the motions all the time.

Such as motions for Summary Judgement where you explain your position.

Trump waived a jury trial. Trump requested summary judgement. The fact the results went against him is irrelevant to what he requested.

WW

 

[progressive hunter]

They allowed his explanation. The court found it worthless.

You seem to be under the impression that the only information presented to the court is via in-person testimony at trial. That is incorrect, there are motions and evidence presented with the motions all the time.

Such as motions for Summary Judgement where you explain your position.

Trump waived a jury trial. Trump requested summary judgement. The fact the results went against him is irrelevant to what he requested.

WW

as I said,, youre going to have to do better than this,,

 

[WorldWatcher]

as I said,, youre going to have to do better than this,,

No need for me to do better, I'm not Trump.

Trump has been found civilly liable under one item of fraud in the state of New York, I don't have to prove anything. The New York AG already proved it to the Judge.

Trial will start Monday and will have two main things:

• Determination of guild or innocence on the other 6 or 7 items (don't remember which off the top of my head),
• And the civil penalties that will be engorged. (Trumps revocation of business certificates has already been imposed.)

WW

 

[progressive hunter]

No need for me to do better, I'm not Trump.

Trump has been found civilly liable under one item of fraud in the state of New York, I don't have to prove anything. The New York AG already proved it to the Judge.

Trial will start Monday and will have two main things:

• Determination of guild or innocence on the other 6 or 7 items (don't remember which off the top of my head),
• And the civil penalties that will be engorged. (Trumps revocation of business certificates has already been imposed.)

WW

so they found him guilty and the trial hasnt even started??

something doesnt sound right about this,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

 

[progressive hunter]

 

[WorldWatcher]

so they found him guilty and the trial hasnt even started??

something doesnt sound right about this,,,

On one item yes, he requested summary judgement. The other complaints filed are scheduled for trial to begin Monday.

Sorry you haven't heard of it before.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Time to attempt to deflect to Biden again.

WW

 

[progressive hunter]

On one item yes, he requested summary judgement. The other complaints filed are scheduled for trial to begin Monday.

Sorry you haven't heard of it before.

WW

so they did find him guilty before the trial even started,,

dont you find something wrong with that??

 

[WorldWatcher]

so they did find him guilty before the trial even started,,

dont you find something wrong with that??

When they requested summary judgement?

No, why.

It's something that existed for centuries.

WW

 

[Crepitus]

The judge’s interpretation of the value of Trump enterprise is incorrect. He is not in the position to determine value. It will be appealed and tossed.

Jewish Hippie Obama supporter Judge Arthur Engoron
View attachment 834956

Exclusive | Real estate insiders bewildered by judge’s $18M valuation of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago: ‘Would list at $300M’

Justice Arthur Engoron’s ruling raised eyebrows by valuing the former president’s Mar-a-Lago estate at $18 million when comparable lots nearby ask much more.

nypost.com

The judge didn't assess anything. That's the tax assessment from the county.

 

[progressive hunter]

When they requested summary judgement?

No, why.

It's something that existed for centuries.

WW

convicting someone before the trial even begins is normal to you???

I have seen that in fascist or communist countries,, but never here in america,,