Read this democrats and realize people are waking up

[Marener]

There is one rule.

The United States Constitution. Simply because the left cannot interpret it correctly is hardly on them.

This court has taught us that the only rule is that the constitution means whatever you want to get what you want.

 

[Marener]

The Voting Rights Act is still intact. The SCOTUS has just returned it to its original meaning, minus the racism that had been put in place by the left.

The Voting Rights Act should NEVER consider skin color for anything. Full stop.

If you think the voting rights act was intended to keep black voters marginalized and out of political power, you’re an absolute idiot.

 

[Nostra]

The Democrats have learned, too late, to adopt Republican tactics.

And boy oh boy do the MAGAs not like taking their own medicine!

Show the class where Republicans have plotted to eliminate an entire court because it said they couldn’t be racist.

GO!

 

[Darkwind]

If you think the voting rights act was intended to keep black voters marginalized and out of political power, you’re an absolute idiot.

It was intended to ensure that every citizen gets a vote. It does not, nor should it ever have been, a mechanism for Democrats to gerrymander Congressional districts on the basis of color.

The Supremes got it right.

 

[Alicia J]

MSN

This writer is spot on, the democrats want to gut the Constitution and any court that rules against them, they want to eliminate the electoral college and create one party rule while they violate every law against it.

Who would have thought that senior members of the democratic party would plan to eliminate a court that voted against them and upheld a constitution? This is what the party has admitted to with this plan for Virginia's Supreme Court.

No one is going to care when we are all paying $7 per gallon for gas soon....thanks to dumb **** imbecile Trump.

Kiss Congress good-bye, Trump Cuck Party.

 

[Marener]

It was intended to ensure that every citizen gets a vote. It does not, nor should it ever have been, a mechanism for Democrats to gerrymander Congressional districts on the basis of color.

The Supremes got it right.

It went well beyond making sure everyone gets a vote. The intent of the bill was to prevent the kind of gerrymandering we see now going to be seeing in the states and will result in far fewer minority office holders.

Oh, and this court didn’t have a problem with a racial gerrymander in Texas.

 

[kflaux]

This is an AI response to the question "in what ways has the current Trump administration violated the U.S. Constitution?"

It's AI, so I wouldn't take it without a grain of salt, but it's a reasonable start toward a comprehensive answer.

________________________________________________

As of May 2026, the second administration of President Donald Trump has faced numerous legal challenges and judicial rulings asserting that various executive actions have violated the U.S. Constitution. These allegations primarily center on executive overreach, violations of civil liberties, and the erosion of the separation of powers. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Below are key areas where the current administration's actions have been identified by courts or legal experts as constitutional violations:

Executive Overreach and Separation of Powers [1]

• Impoundment of Funds: The administration has been accused of violating the Constitution's Appropriations Clause by unilaterally freezing or "impounding" funds already approved by Congress.
• Defiance of Judicial Rulings: Federal judges have noted a pattern where the executive branch flouts court decisions, such as continuing to deny bond hearings for immigrants after a judge ruled the practice unlawful.
• Unauthorized Military Action: The administration has faced criticism for initiating military strikes and hostilities abroad without obtaining the required Congressional authorization.
• Bypassing Congress via DOGE: A federal judge ruled that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) unconstitutionally cancelled over $100 million in humanities grants, as the department lacked the legal authority to override Congressional spending. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Civil Rights and Individual Liberties

• Birthright Citizenship: An executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship was blocked by a federal judge who cited it as a direct violation of the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to those born on U.S. soil.
• Due Process Violations: The use of the Alien Enemies Act to accelerate mass deportations without individual hearings was challenged; the Supreme Court recently ruled that individuals must be granted due process under the 5th Amendment before removal.
• First Amendment Retaliation: Courts have ruled against the administration for canceling grants based on the political or ideological viewpoints of recipients, citing a violation of freedom of speech.
• Punitive Federalism: The administration has been found to have violated Equal Protection requirements by selectively canceling federal funding for clean energy projects specifically in states that did not vote for President Trump in the 2024 election. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Additional Constitutional Concerns

• Foreign Emoluments: Concerns persist regarding the Foreign Emoluments Clause, which prohibits federal officials from receiving gifts or benefits from foreign states, particularly in relation to the President's ongoing business interests and international deals.
• Voter Protection: The administration has been accused of infringing on states' rights and Congressional authority by attempting to unilaterally change federal voter registration requirements.

 

[Darkwind]

It went well beyond making sure everyone gets a vote. The intent of the bill was to prevent the kind of gerrymandering we see now going to be seeing in the states and will result in far fewer minority office holders.

Oh, and this court didn’t have a problem with a racial gerrymander in Texas.

No, the ruling prevents the kind of gerrymandering that was being enacted.

They were making up districts on the sole basis of race. They even have a term for it. "Predominantly Majority Black"

That is a crime. The ONLY criterion for the Voting Rights Act is the number of bodies as apportioned by the population and census.

But I guess you racists are going to be racist.

 

[Marener]

No, the ruling prevents the kind of gerrymandering that was being enacted.

They were making up districts on the sole basis of race. They even have a term for it. "Predominantly Majority Black"

That is a crime. The ONLY criterion for the Voting Rights Act is the number of bodies as apportioned by the population and census.

But I guess you racists are going to be racist.

And yet SCOTUS was fine with Texas looking for black voters to divide them up and prevent them from being too concentrated in a district.

Sorry, you’re rewriting history. Building majority minority districts was exactly what the VRA intended. You can say that’s unconstitutional, but you can’t rewrite history and say it wasn’t the point.

Black representation in Congress is doing to drop. By a lot. That’s exactly what Republicans want but they’ll lie to themselves to believe otherwise.

 

[initforme]

I've decided to sit out November even though liars will tell us it's the most i.pirtant election as we hear every year. Blatant liars.

 

[Moonglow]

MSN

This writer is spot on, the democrats want to gut the Constitution and any court that rules against them, they want to eliminate the electoral college and create one party rule while they violate every law against it.

Who would have thought that senior members of the democratic party would plan to eliminate a court that voted against them and upheld a constitution? This is what the party has admitted to with this plan for Virginia's Supreme Court.

Trump is gutting the Constitution and any ethics he can and you love it!

Eliminating Electoral College favored by majority of ...​

Pew Research Center
https://www.pewresearch.org › ... › Politics & Policy




Sep 25, 2024 — 63% of U.S. adults say the way the president is elected should be changed so that the winner of the popular vote nationwide wins the ...

 

[Darkwind]

And yet SCOTUS was fine with Texas looking for black voters to divide them up and prevent them from being too concentrated in a district.

Sorry, you’re rewriting history. Building majority minority districts was exactly what the VRA intended. You can say that’s unconstitutional, but you can’t rewrite history and say it wasn’t the point.

Black representation in Congress is doing to drop. By a lot. That’s exactly what Republicans want but they’ll lie to themselves to believe otherwise.

They were not. That is just a lame ass talking point that has no basis in reality.

 

[Marener]

They were not. That is just a lame ass talking point that has no basis in reality.

They literally had the emails from Republicans saying they wanted to break up black voting populations.

But that’s okay.

Are you happy that there’ll be fewer black representatives in Congress?

 

[Concerned American]

This court has taught us that the only rule is that the constitution means whatever you want to get what you want.

Degenerate, DeRossi and O'Donnell made the move to greener pastures (no pun intended for the cows), I'm sure you could do the same. Meanwhile, we supporters of the US constitution are more than happy here in America.

 

[Thinker101]

No one is going to care when we are all paying $7 per gallon for gas soon....thanks to dumb **** imbecile Trump.

Kiss Congress good-bye, Trump Cuck Party.

Dang, are we going back to the Biden years?

 

[Marener]

Degenerate, DeRossi and O'Donnell made the move to greener pastures (no pun intended for the cows), I'm sure you could do the same. Meanwhile, we supporters of the US constitution are more than happy here in America.

You’re delusional.

 

[Concerned American]

You’re delusional.

I'm not calling for ignoring the constitution -- YOU ARE. You also resemble that ^^ remark.

 

[eagle1462010]

Dang, are we going back to the Biden years?

Bin Biden did the shit on purpose. Attacking oil companies day one.

Killed the Keystone pipeline day 1.

 

[22lcidw]

The Voting Rights Act was a response to what happened in the South after Reconstruction.

SCOTUS is taking us back to a time when black people were excluded from political power by the white majority.

African Americans can vote.

 

[22lcidw]

And yet SCOTUS was fine with Texas looking for black voters to divide them up and prevent them from being too concentrated in a district.

Sorry, you’re rewriting history. Building majority minority districts was exactly what the VRA intended. You can say that’s unconstitutional, but you can’t rewrite history and say it wasn’t the point.

Black representation in Congress is doing to drop. By a lot. That’s exactly what Republicans want but they’ll lie to themselves to believe otherwise.

All the Progressive Socialist Communist states that gerrymandered over decades you have no concern for.