DustyInfinity
Platinum Member
I have a simple Midwest Viewpoint. My dad became a teacher when he got back from Vietnam, and my mother worked as a dental tech. They worked hard, they saved money, and they sacrificed to take care of their kids. To me, that is the core of traditionalism. Families working, saving, and succeeding. We never had a lot of money, and my parents worked long hours, but we were happy. Why is this way of life wrong? Why do we need to go to universal programs? I have heard politicians on the left say it is impossible to succeed if you were not born rich. Why? Could someone tell me why we are moving to a heavier government service political model? I think we can encourage traditional success while still helping the poor. It would seem that universal programs would prevent traditional success and harm way more people than it would help. What am I missing?