Pyramids are impossible: Grok AI

[DennisPTate]

The accuracy is ten times higher than modern times buildings. Impossible to achieve with any means they could have had. That is evidenced by the fact that the earlier constructions are more sophisticated than the newer, according to Grok AI.

From what I have read on this topic I would say that Grok AI is a lot more honest than the supposed experts are. We don't want to admit that we humans are no where nearly as superior or as clearly "Apex Predators" as we like to think that we are.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Egypt’s Oldest Papyri Detail Great Pyramid Construction | HISTORY

Egypt’s oldest papyrus fragments, which detail the construction of the Great Pyramid of Giza, have gone on public dis...

www.history.com

Notations on buildings in France dates their construction to 1944

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If true, Grok AI just says what every human in his right mind would also conclude: Pyramids are way too complex for ancient Egyptians to build. It also says they are way older than they tell us. It says thousands of years of constant rain are required to cause the erosion. And there was no rain for thousands of years there, except for some exceptions.

They’re probably at least 24,000 years and were built by a prior technologically advanced civilization, long since vanished

 

[Augustine_]

View attachment 1251257

Notations on buildings in France dates their construction to 1944

Kilroy AI sending images from another timeline

 

[Hypatia415]

They’re probably at least 24,000 years and were built by a prior technologically advanced civilization, long since vanished

No they are not. Where do you get all this nonsense?

We know how the pyramids were constructed and experimental archaeology has replicated much of that. There are also hieroglyphic inscriptions still visible in the Great pyramid of Giza although much more recent graffiti has covered a lot of them.

Why are you and others so arrogant you cannot conceive that ancient peoples could have constructed these edifices?

And where did you get the notion that:

"Pyramids and the Sphinx, likely that these too were already there when the Egyptians showed up"

From where exactly did the Egyptians show up?

 

[Bleipriester]

No they are not. Where do you get all this nonsense?

We know how the pyramids were constructed and experimental archaeology has replicated much of that. There are also hieroglyphic inscriptions still visible in the Great pyramid of Giza although much more recent graffiti has covered a lot of them.

Why are you and others so arrogant you cannot conceive that ancient peoples could have constructed these edifices?

And where did you get the notion that:



From where exactly did the Egyptians show up?

It is not even possible to build one with today´s means. Why don´t you take this into account?

 

[Hypatia415]

It is not even possible to build one with today´s means. Why don´t you take this into account?

Of course it is possible. Why do you believe nonsense?

 

[Bleipriester]

Of course it is possible. Why do you believe nonsense?

It is not. Today´s accuracy can´t match the Pyramid´s accuracy.

 

[Hypatia415]

It is not. Today´s accuracy can´t match the Pyramid´s accuracy.

Says who? Unless of course you are suggesting the ancient Egyptians were more technologically advanced using bronze and copper tools than present western societies!

 

[Bleipriester]

Says who?

The video.

 

[Hypatia415]

The video.

The video is nonsense. Why people think AI used in things like this must be infallible never ceases to amuse me.

 

[Bleipriester]

The video is nonsense. Why people think AI used in things like this must be infallible never ceases to amuse me.

It is the grand picture. You have some extraordinary explanation for every aspect of the pyramid. That is simply too much.

I asked Grok. Read here:
Text

 

[Hypatia415]

It is the grand picture. You have some extraordinary explanation for every aspect of the pyramid. That is simply too much.

I asked Grok. Read here:
Text

Oh for goodness sake read some serious Egyptologists' works.

 

[Bleipriester]

Oh for goodness sake read some serious Egyptologists' works.

The topic also includes their work. For the most part they can only conclude what the Egyptian authorities want to.

 

[Hypatia415]

The topic also includes their work. For the most part they can only conclude what the Egyptian authorities want to.

Do you really imagine that international Egyptology is in thrall to the Egyptian authorities? Is that another of your conspiracy theories?

 

[Bleipriester]

Do you really imagine that international Egyptology is in thrall to the Egyptian authorities? Is that another of your conspiracy theories?

Your logic is lacking, not mine. Egyptian pyramids aren´t international but located in Egypt. And the Egyptians don´t want other cultures or aliens to be responsible for the pyramids but Egypt.

 

[Lockback]

It is not. Today´s accuracy can´t match the Pyramid´s accuracy.

I love how folks are so enamored with the history they've learned, they're not willing to examine things to the point they realize that what they were taught couldn't have happened.
The technology used to construct the pyramids (and many other things) is far too advanced to have been done by ancient rudimentary societies. There's a whole past we don't know about yet, partly because we've smugly accepted the standard explanations.

 

[Hypatia415]

Your logic is lacking, not mine. Egyptian pyramids aren´t international.

Egyptologists are!

And the Egyptians don´t want other cultures or aliens to be responsible for the pyramids but Egypt.

Because no other culture is responsible. Nor are present day Egyptians the same people as those of that ancient culture. Over the millennia there has been an influx of peoples from other regions of the world including Greece and Arabia.

 

[Hypatia415]

I love how folks are so enamored with the history they've learned, they're not willing to examine things to the point they realize that what they were taught couldn't have happened.

History as with all disciplines reassess its theories when new and attested evidence is brought to light.

Conspiracy theories about lost civilisations, aliens with lasers, and heaven knows what else have bubbled around these ancient structures since at least the 1960s.

The technology used to construct the pyramids (and many other things) is far too advanced to have been done by ancient rudimentary societies.

Dynastic ancient Egypt was hardly a "rudimentary" society.

There's a whole past we don't know about yet, partly because we've smugly accepted the standard explanations.

Are you going to allege the Gingerbread House once stood in the Black Forest? How about an expedition to find the castle where a princess and her court slept for one hundred years!

 

[Lockback]

History as with all disciplines reassess its theories when new and attested evidence is brought to light.

Conspiracy theories about lost civilisations, aliens with lasers, and heaven knows what else have bubbled around these ancient structures since at least the 1960s.



Dynastic ancient Egypt was hardly a "rudimentary" society.

Are you going to allege the Gingerbread House once stood in the Black Forest? How about an expedition to find the castle where a princess and her court slept for one hundred years!

You can attempt your mockery, if you wish.
It falls on deaf ears. The technology to build the pyramids to the exacting, incredibly minute standards we see today didn't exist then as explained by standard history. The ability to move incredibly heavy granite hundreds of miles didn't exist then as explained by modern history.
Sorry, pal. It doesn't add up.