Your comments do rather ask for it.
It has been explained.
There are several quite rational theories as to how that was achieved.
It does but you prefer aliens and long-lost and unknown civilisations. In other words, the comforts of unreason
Believe what you will.
I am not the one indulging in fantasy. That you evidently did not read the links I gave tells me all I need to know about your position on this matter.
I really couldn't care less what you think, pal.
Do tell us all what hyroglyphics might be? Or did you mean hieroglyphs?
You might want to not act like an asshole. But I see that's impossible for you.
It doesn´t matter. They are the Egyptians and are proud about the pyramids. And if you want to conduct an excavation or something similar there you need their approval. You even need an explanation for why no Pharao was found inside.
And they jealousy guard those sites. There's a reason ...
Something is wrong with these buildings, that is for sure.
With every post your "I'm An Asshole" count goes up.
The structures and various other ancient sites are a good source for tourism.
That is true of all countries with ancient sites.
Sarcophagi are there but we know that tomb raiding was carried out even in ancient times. Thus the body may have been stolen for the artefacts buried with it. Or it may have been moved to prevent it being looted and was located somewhere else and has, so far, not been found.
www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk
Your alacrity in resorting to ad hominem remarks is duly noted.
Ooooh! Now what might that reason be dare one ask?
Your creepy obsession with me has ended.
Can't answer the question eh?
Even more when aliens made them.
Few of them have wild stories twining around them.
I know the explanations. Robbers can´t go to the Pharao´s grave and steal his body, though. And they get no buyer.Sarcophagi are there but we know that tomb raiding was carried out even in ancient times. Thus the body may have been stolen for the artefacts buried with it. Or it may have been moved to prevent it being looted and was located somewhere else and has, so far, not been found.
Tomb Robbery Papyrus (Papyrus Mayer A)
Papyrus Mayer A is a legal document containing a portion of evidence at the trial of the tomb robbers at Thebes. It consists of a single sheet measuring 1430 mm x 425 mm, cut vertically into two portions, of length 795 and 635 mm respectively, and inscribed on both faces. In addition to the...
Papyrus Mayer A is a legal document containing a portion of evidence at the trial of the tomb robbers at Thebes. It consists of a single sheet measuring 1430 mm x 425 mm, cut vertically into two portions, of length 795 and 635 mm respectively, and inscribed on both faces. In addition to the cutting of the papyrus into two pieces some trimming has been done along the edge, for on the verso there is a line of hieratic running across the top which has been so mutilated that the upper halves of its opening signs have been cut away. The two separate sheets of which the document now consists have been covered back and front with a semi-transparent paper (papier vegetal) that gives an appearance of brown varnish. Following the Second World War an attempt was made to remove the paper covering from one sheet. This process was not successful and now one sheet is now torn and extremely fragile; with the other sheet just having one mark where the paper has been removed. Some infrared photography was done in September 2006. The date recorded within the text corresponds to years 19 and 20 of Ramesses XI Menmaatre-setpenptah (ruled about 1103/1099-1070/1069 BC). The papyrus consists of a series of short reports into the examination of the accused in two separate series of thefts, one from certain gilded portable shrines, the other from various tombs in the royal necropolis. Earlier stages of the investigation into the robberies in the necropolis, held before the same judges, are given in a papyrus in the British Museum (pap. BM10052) written in the same hand and style.
And The British Museum Images
Oh lord! Do you really believe that nonsense?
The pyramids were remarked upon as ancient wonders by Herodotus - I assume you have heard of him?
The artefacts would have been of more interest. If the body was looted it was likely dumped somewhere.
I did not say that. I said such stories will boost tourism. But however, since we do exist, how can you rule out the existence of other human like civilizations out there?
I looked it up. I guess his stuff is based on hearsay:
Sure, agreed. But you will still have to explain why nobody cared.
Plenty did care.
