What AI isn't

[EdwinAMartin]

It's just a better search engine, is all, not real intelligence. The AI search results are usually just summaries and usually also include the links to its sources, so the summaries should include those as well. Nothing wrong with that per se.

 

[Bleipriester]

All decisions are made by people, the people who designed the software, chose the rules, selected the data, the decision to use it during warfare, those are the actual and only decisions, all decisions are made by humans.

You still refuse to understand.

 

[Bleipriester]

an actor might simulate performing an operation, but he isn't actually performing an operation.

AI does. The way it does it is actually not relevant for the result.

 

[Churchill]

You still refuse to understand.

No, I refuse to agree with you.

 

[Bleipriester]

No, I refuse to agree with you.

That is the same most of the time

 

[Churchill]

That is the same most of the time

Several people have made an effort to explain stuff to you, you're not interested in learning, so that's the end of my interaction with you.

Have a nice day.

 

[Bleipriester]

Several people have made an effort to explain stuff to you, you're not interested in learning, so that's the end of my interaction with you.

Have a nice day.

Yeah, you too.

 

[rosends]

AI does. The way it does it is actually not relevant for the result.

but though the AI gives the appearance of decision making, it is really simply coming to an algorithmic conclusion.

 

[Bleipriester]

but though the AI gives the appearance of decision making, it is really simply coming to an algorithmic conclusion.

I never disputed that. I said from beginning that it is just software with no life in it. But this AI is this complex that it will be installed in a human body shaped robot. The final result might be - one day - that there will be "synths", robots that cannot be distinguished from actual humans. Still dead machines they are but you won´t know.
What I am trying to say is that there is no point in belittling this software. They even get IQ ratings. The currently smartest LLMs are GPT 5.4 Pro (Vision) and GPT 5.4 Thinking (consider this name: thinking) with an IQ of 130 each.

Tracking AI

Tracking AI is a cutting-edge application that unveils the IQ Scores of frontier artificial intelligence models. Explore and analyze the IQ Scores of AIs with our intuitive platform, designed to foster transparency in the world of artificial intelligence. Stay informed and uncover the IQs...

trackingai.org

Also look up the history there to see how quick the AI develops. It will soon be smarter than any human.

 

[rosends]

I never disputed that. I said from beginning that it is just software with no life in it. But this AI is this complex that it will be installed in a human body shaped robot. The final result might be - one day - that there will be "synths", robots that cannot be distinguished from actual humans. Still dead machines they are but you won´t know.

this, I agree with and I fear that that day, the moment when a person can't tell the difference, is fast approaching. This however, speaks just as much to the laziness and stupidity of the average person as it does about the complexity of the android's programming

What I am trying to say is that there is no point in belittling this software. They even get IQ ratings. The currently smartest LLMs are GPT 5.4 Pro (Vision) and GPT 5.4 Thinking (consider this name: thinking) with an IQ of 130 each.

Tracking AI

Tracking AI is a cutting-edge application that unveils the IQ Scores of frontier artificial intelligence models. Explore and analyze the IQ Scores of AIs with our intuitive platform, designed to foster transparency in the world of artificial intelligence. Stay informed and uncover the IQs...

trackingai.org

If we can agree that there is no actual "reasoning" going on, just the appearance of reasoning then I'm more than happy to belittle the people who rely on AI as if it is a reasoning being.

 

[Bleipriester]

this, I agree with and I fear that that day, the moment when a person can't tell the difference, is fast approaching. This however, speaks just as much to the laziness and stupidity of the average person as it does about the complexity of the android's programming

If we can agree that there is no actual "reasoning" going on, just the appearance of reasoning then I'm more than happy to belittle the people who rely on AI as if it is a reasoning being.

We do not agree. It is reasoning. Just not the way humans do but with similar results. Those who need AI to create a text should not create a text in the first place. But AI can way more. It will be applied everywhere.