Protesters in Wisconsin cause $7.5 million in damage to State House

[bodecea]

Give those shells to Abby at NCIS and they would know in 15 minutes who they belonged to! But I would like to hear the reasoning why Dem's who are pickiting would throw bullets aroun in the grass, what would they be doing this for? Or why would someone do this to make it look like someone else did it? any ideas?

And what's the big deal about bullets anyways? Bullets and tape....evil! evil! evil!

Absolutely nothing until you are on the business end of a gun with one in the chamber.

Immie

But don't people have the right to carry guns and bullets at political rallies and people saying otherwise hate the 2nd amendment?

 

[Jarhead]

I read well enough to notice quite clearly that you have yet to point out where Obama, et al stopped anyone from speaking their mind. Perhaps you forgot?

Better said this way...

You lied.

If you read a few posts down you would have seen that RW and I were not talking about anyone stopping anyone from protesting.

You would have, instead, noticed that RW and I were debating how politicians make those that protest and think differetnly than they do, come across as more "evil and destructive" than they really are.

So....you lied when you said you read enough to know....becuase if you did uyou NEVER would have seen wherte I said they stopped them.

Thats the second time in a week I caught you in a lie.....

You have an honesty issue I see.

Sooo...you are denying saying what I highlighted you saying.....and I have an honesty issue?

Nice spin.

Nope. I do not deny what I said.

But as I said....you cherry picked that line and applied it to the context you opted to apply it to.

When I pointed thast out to you, you lied and you said you read enough of the thread to know the context that I meant it and it was the context you claimed I meant it.

But as I said...if you truly read the thread, you would see it was meant in anbother context.

So without the spin.....

Did you truly find the post where the true context of the line was found...or did you lie and simply claim that you did?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I already feel sorry for the janitor who has to clean up all the feces spattered on the restroom walls&floors. Far Lefties probably used the restroom floors when the toilets were clogged up due to the last liberal who pooped and wiped,and then flushed! (gee,even by the time normal people are four years old,they know better to poop,,then flush,,then wipe,,then flush again !!!)

Lifetimes are spent cleaning up the mess left behind by the Marxists. Nothing new here.

That is what Walker is doing in WI.

 

[Jarhead]

I guess you are right

Maybe they should just take a $1.98 can of GOOP and remove those nasty tape stains

Yeah...they should....but there is no political expediency associated with that kind of action.

Gee...I wonder why Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the others didnt just let people who disagreed with them speak their minds as they did...

Oh wait.....there would have been no political expediency attached to that action either.

Wonder why you didnt criticize them as you did Walker?

Oh wait....there would be no partisanship associated with that action.

Here it is again....only bigger. But maybe you really didn't say it?

Hey....little boy...

Enough with the childish games...

 

[bodecea]

Better said this way...

You lied.

If you read a few posts down you would have seen that RW and I were not talking about anyone stopping anyone from protesting.

You would have, instead, noticed that RW and I were debating how politicians make those that protest and think differetnly than they do, come across as more "evil and destructive" than they really are.

So....you lied when you said you read enough to know....becuase if you did uyou NEVER would have seen wherte I said they stopped them.

Thats the second time in a week I caught you in a lie.....

You have an honesty issue I see.

Sooo...you are denying saying what I highlighted you saying.....and I have an honesty issue?

Nice spin.

Nope. I do not deny what I said.

But as I said....you cherry picked that line and applied it to the context you opted to apply it to.

When I pointed thast out to you, you lied and you said you read enough of the thread to know the context that I meant it and it was the context you claimed I meant it.

But as I said...if you truly read the thread, you would see it was meant in anbother context.

So without the spin.....

Did you truly find the post where the true context of the line was found...or did you lie and simply claim that you did?

Really? I cherry picked? I didn't leave the rest of your post up? Just cherrypicked?

Hmmm....I don't think so.

 

[Jarhead]

If thats the best ya got RW...

Then you aint got much.

We got a $7.5 million estimate that Gov Walker evidently believes is credible

Show a lot about:

1. His motives to paint protesters as vandals
2. His inability to handle basic fiscal decisions

Yeah,,,,
sure...

Painting protestors in a negaitve light is a brand new concept to politicians.

I saw that 7.5 million and I simply said to myself....sure......another politician trying to make those that disagree with him look evil.

Sort of what Pelosi Did with the tea partyers.
Sort of what Reid did with the tea partyers.
Sort of what just about every democrativ politician did with the tea partyers
Sort of what that spineless congressman did with the protestor that he falsely claimed spit at him...the lying bastard....
Sort of what the GOP does to the DEMS
Sort of what the DEMS do to the GOP

SORT OF WHAT YOU DO NEARLY EVERYDAY with the tea partyers....but I digress.

But you see...the difference between you and I?

I am not ready to give the folks on my side a free pass like you are.

I will criticize all of them for the childish games they play.

Yo....little BODECEA child....
Here was the context it was siad......
See above you lazy lying little child.

 

[Jarhead]

Sooo...you are denying saying what I highlighted you saying.....and I have an honesty issue?

Nice spin.

Nope. I do not deny what I said.

But as I said....you cherry picked that line and applied it to the context you opted to apply it to.

When I pointed thast out to you, you lied and you said you read enough of the thread to know the context that I meant it and it was the context you claimed I meant it.

But as I said...if you truly read the thread, you would see it was meant in anbother context.

So without the spin.....

Did you truly find the post where the true context of the line was found...or did you lie and simply claim that you did?

Really? I cherry picked? I didn't leave the rest of your post up? Just cherrypicked?

Hmmm....I don't think so.

cherry picking an entire post and not applying it in the context it was written is cherry picking.
No go away.....you are out of your league with me.
I do not debate liars.....

And you lied when you said you reviewed the thread....as I showed you below.

 

[bodecea]

I already feel sorry for the janitor who has to clean up all the feces spattered on the restroom walls&floors. Far Lefties probably used the restroom floors when the toilets were clogged up due to the last liberal who pooped and wiped,and then flushed! (gee,even by the time normal people are four years old,they know better to poop,,then flush,,then wipe,,then flush again !!!)

Lifetimes are spent cleaning up the mess left behind by the Marxists. Nothing new here.

That is what Walker is doing in WI.

Tape marks....*snicker Brave Sir Walker!

 

[Wry Catcher]

Crowds of left or right leaning protesters are an example of mobocracy, something the founder fathers were wary of for good reason. We are a republic, democratic in the sense that we elect our representatives to exercise calm, reasoned judgment. Of course never in our history have our represntatives remained calm or ignored personal or parochial interests when making judgments.

Today however, elected representatives incite and cheer mobs who support their ideology for personal and parochial advantage - reason rarely enters into the conversation. We have become a circular argument, mobs cheer faux leaders who cheer the mob.

Sad.

 

[bodecea]

Nice spin.

Nope. I do not deny what I said.

But as I said....you cherry picked that line and applied it to the context you opted to apply it to.

When I pointed thast out to you, you lied and you said you read enough of the thread to know the context that I meant it and it was the context you claimed I meant it.

But as I said...if you truly read the thread, you would see it was meant in anbother context.

So without the spin.....

Did you truly find the post where the true context of the line was found...or did you lie and simply claim that you did?

Really? I cherry picked? I didn't leave the rest of your post up? Just cherrypicked?

Hmmm....I don't think so.

cherry picking an entire post and not applying it in the context it was written is cherry picking.
No go away.....you are out of your league with me.
I do not debate liars.....

And you lied when you said you reviewed the thread....as I showed you below.

Now you accuse me of lying when I obviously did NOT cherrypick...your entire post and any links from it are there to be seen.

Obviously, you have a rather reflective definition of "liar" besides not being too happy about your own words coming back to bite you. If you can't handle the mirror being held up to you, that is your own weakness.

 

[R.D.]

Tape marks....*snicker Brave Sir Walker!

Fortunately your low standards don't apply to everyone. I

 

[Immanuel]

And what's the big deal about bullets anyways? Bullets and tape....evil! evil! evil!

Absolutely nothing until you are on the business end of a gun with one in the chamber.

Immie

But don't people have the right to carry guns and bullets at political rallies and people saying otherwise hate the 2nd amendment?

I never made that argument during the events that people (whom I termed idiots) showed up with weapons at Obama's speeches. They had the right to be there with weapons. But knowing when to exercise a right and when not to are two different matters.

As for the other part of your statement, no, I don't think that someone who argues that people do not have that right hate the 2nd amendment. Promoting common sense restrictions upon rights does not equal hating that right. We have the right to free speech. We do not have the right to threaten or harass someone and claim that it is our right to do so and any attempt to squelch said speech is a violation of the first amendment.

Immie

 

[bodecea]

Absolutely nothing until you are on the business end of a gun with one in the chamber.

Immie

But don't people have the right to carry guns and bullets at political rallies and people saying otherwise hate the 2nd amendment?

I never made that argument during the events that people (whom I termed idiots) showed up with weapons at Obama's speeches. They had the right to be there with weapons. But knowing when to exercise a right and when not to are two different matters.

As for the other part of your statement, no, I don't think that someone who argues that people do not have that right hate the 2nd amendment. Promoting common sense restrictions upon rights does not equal hating that right. We have the right to free speech. We do not have the right to threaten or harass someone and claim that it is our right to do so and any attempt to squelch said speech is a violation of the first amendment.

Immie

I agree with you and never meant to say that you personally made such 2nd amendment arguments...but they WERE made and quite loudly that people have the 2nd amendment right to carry weapons at political rallies and anyone arguing against them being allowed to do so hates the Constitution. I wonder if it would be worth the effort to look up those threads and see if we have some of the same posters flip flopping on the bullets found in WI.

 

[Jarhead]

Really? I cherry picked? I didn't leave the rest of your post up? Just cherrypicked?

Hmmm....I don't think so.

cherry picking an entire post and not applying it in the context it was written is cherry picking.
No go away.....you are out of your league with me.
I do not debate liars.....

And you lied when you said you reviewed the thread....as I showed you below.

Now you accuse me of lying when I obviously did NOT cherrypick...your entire post and any links from it are there to be seen.

Obviously, you have a rather reflective definition of "liar" besides not being too happy about your own words coming back to bite you. If you can't handle the mirror being held up to you, that is your own weakness.

INteresting...

You completely ignored my post that proved you lied.

Yet you continue with the lie.
And now you are attacking the cherry pick...and completely off the topic of which you lied about.

But you see....I WILL NOT LET YOU GET AWAY WITH IT.

I will haunt you with it...until you back off you child.

The Lie was when you said you read the thread and knew the context of what I said.

I showed you the context of what I said and if you had read the thread you would have known otherwsie.So you lied.

Furthermore, the term cherry picked does not always refer to one line....it can also refer to a full post...and if you take that post and apply it to a different meaning, it is cherry picking a p[ost out of a debate and applying a different contect to it.

Just as you did.

So you are a liar, a deflector...and a child...all wrapped up in one.

 

[bodecea]

Tape marks....*snicker Brave Sir Walker!

Fortunately your low standards don't apply to everyone. I

I know...silly low standards of mine not going all outraged over tape marks. Geesh! I should be writing my congressman and having a royal fit over it!

 

[DiveCon]

I already feel sorry for the janitor who has to clean up all the feces spattered on the restroom walls&floors. Far Lefties probably used the restroom floors when the toilets were clogged up due to the last liberal who pooped and wiped,and then flushed! (gee,even by the time normal people are four years old,they know better to poop,,then flush,,then wipe,,then flush again !!!)

Lifetimes are spent cleaning up the mess left behind by the Marxists. Nothing new here.

That is what Walker is doing in WI.

Tape marks....*snicker Brave Sir Walker!

uh, no
budget issues

 

[Wicked Jester]

What, Bodecea was caught lying AGAIN?

Figures.

 

[JFK_USA]

What type of world is it when we can't believe Fox News biased reporting? Seriously I give the Onion more crediblity than Fake News. You see in there "reporting" that they are painting protesters in Wisconsin as "violent" yet never any arrests. Fox "News" prey on stupid people like Wicked Jester and the rest of the conservatives.

 

[rightwinger]

Protesters to Governor Walker:

Stand back! We have Duct Tape and are prepared to use it!

 

[Immanuel]

But don't people have the right to carry guns and bullets at political rallies and people saying otherwise hate the 2nd amendment?

I never made that argument during the events that people (whom I termed idiots) showed up with weapons at Obama's speeches. They had the right to be there with weapons. But knowing when to exercise a right and when not to are two different matters.

As for the other part of your statement, no, I don't think that someone who argues that people do not have that right hate the 2nd amendment. Promoting common sense restrictions upon rights does not equal hating that right. We have the right to free speech. We do not have the right to threaten or harass someone and claim that it is our right to do so and any attempt to squelch said speech is a violation of the first amendment.

Immie

I agree with you and never meant to say that you personally made such 2nd amendment arguments...but they WERE made and quite loudly that people have the 2nd amendment right to carry weapons at political rallies and anyone arguing against them being allowed to do so hates the Constitution. I wonder if it would be worth the effort to look up those threads and see if we have some of the same posters flip flopping on the bullets found in WI.

I didn't think you were singling me out. I was just clarifying that I was not one of those who made that argument.

I know that they were made. I am pretty sure that RSG jumped down my throat on that one. Another one that I think did so, but not 100% positive it was this particular instance, was Lonestar_Logic. There were others.

Immie