Proof Of The Bible

[Viktor]

Proof Of The Bible - Google Groups

groups.google.com

Research proves that the historical portions of the Old Testament are very accurate. Some of the New Testament has been verified, too.

 

[surada]

Proof Of The Bible - Google Groups

groups.google.com

Research proves that the historical portions of the Old Testament are very accurate.

Like what for example?

 

[Indeependent]

Like what for example?

Did you look at the Link?

 

[surada]

Did you look at the Link?

Yes. It's another discussion group.. or beginning of one.

 

[Viktor]

Did you look at the Link?

That yoyo never read the bible.

 

[surada]

That yoyo never read the bible.

I've read the Bible a half dozen times. What stories in the Bible are historically accurate?

 

[Indeependent]

I've read the Bible a half dozen times. What stories in the Bible are historically accurate?

You don’t know the language and it needs to be studied, not read.

 

[surada]

You don’t know the language and it needs to be studied, not read.

Oh I have studied it intently. Which Bible stories are historically accurate?

 

[alang1216]

Proof Of The Bible - Google Groups

groups.google.com

Research proves that the historical portions of the Old Testament are very accurate. Some of the New Testament has been verified, too.

I don't know anyone who thinks there is no real history in the Bible. Only a very few think everything is true. Like most things, the truth is somewhere in between.

 

[JoeBlow]

Proof Of The Bible - Google Groups

groups.google.com

Research proves that the historical portions of the Old Testament are very accurate. Some of the New Testament has been verified, too.

The only thing anyone cares about is whether the big things in the bible are true. Like how man came about, proof of any miracles, proof that Jesus rose again and became a zombie, the parting of the sea, the Flood... you know, the big stuff, got any proof of any of that?

 

[surada]

I don't know anyone who thinks there is no real history in the Bible. Only a very few think everything is true. Like most things, the truth is somewhere in between.

Herod didn't kill all the baby boys.

 

[JoeBlow]

Herod didn't kill all the baby boys.

There was no 40 day flood.

 

[Moonglow]

There was no 40 day flood.

According to Sumerian history there was in the Epic of Gilgamesh.

 

[DukeU]

There was no 40 day flood.

But, there was big bang, correct?!?

 

[JoeBlow]

According to Sumerian history there was in the Epic of Gilgamesh.

There is no archeological proof for such a worldwide flood. No matter what someone pounded out on a rock, lol.

 

[JoeBlow]

But, there was big bang, correct?!?

Science can't see all the way back to the Big Bang, so we can only theorize what happened.

 

[surada]

According to Sumerian history there was in the Epic of Gilgamesh.

That too was a myth based on real flooding of the Euphrates river basin.

 

[Woodznutz]

You don’t know the language and it needs to be studied, not read.

Best read as a historical novel first, then studied.

 

[Woodznutz]

Herod didn't kill all the baby boys.

He killed a few Benjamite kids around Bethlehem. If he had killed Jewish kids there would have been an uprising.

 

[Woodznutz]

There is no archeological proof for such a worldwide flood. No matter what someone pounded out on a rock, lol.

Why would there be?