We aren't saying we know god doesnt exist. .
?????...what did you think "there is no god" meant?........
If you are going to believe a story don't you think you should expect some evidence? You can't provide any evidence. Just words. Your hypothis a god exists doesn't even qualify as a theory.
I'm watching yet another pbs show on the history of religion. It is amazing you believe any stories those people told. Not a word.
That bible you're reading completely made up. Time to evolve.
but he isn't saying God doesn't exist......lol.....
If christianity didn't exist you'd be quoting the Koran idiot.
You wouldnt have any reason to doubt it. The only reason you deny the Koran is it conflicts with your bullshit story.
Same thing happened between the Greeks and Babylonians. Each had a top god but they were completely different. Each side argued why their god was real and the other one not.
Neither side imagined they might both be made up.
Yea there's a heaven waiting for you where you live happy forever. Do you even hear yourself?
and all this is supposed to prove that you don't say there is no god?......
Miracles have not been demonstrated to occur plus the existence of a miracle would pose
logical problems for belief in a god which can supposedly see the future and began the universe with a set of predefined laws. Most alleged miracles can be explained as
statistically unlikely occurrences. For example, one child surviving a plane crash that kills two hundred others is not a miracle, just as one person winning the lottery is not. In the absence of any empirical evidence, all other claims can be dismissed as the result of
magical thinking, misattribution,
credulity, hearsay and
anecdote. Eye-witness testimony and anecdotal accounts are, by themselves,
not reliable or definitive forms of proof for such extraordinary claims.
Theists often fail to adequately
apportion blame when claims of their particular godās āinfinite mercyā or āomnibenevolenceā involve sparing a few lives in a disaster, or recovery from a debilitating disease ā all of which their god would ultimately be
responsible for inflicting if it existed.
Morality is a cultural concept with a basis in
evolutionary psychology and
game theory. Species whose members were predisposed to cooperate were more likely to survive and pass on their genes. Reciprocacy, altruism and other so-called āmoralā characteristics are
evident in many species. The neurochemical thought to regulate morality and empathy is
oxytocin. Religious texts are simply part of
many early attempts to codify moral precepts. Secular law, flexible with the shifting
moral zeitgeist, has long since superseded religion as a source of moral directives for the majority of developed societies.
Secular ethics offers a number of competing moral frameworks which do not derive from a purported supernatural source.
People need to believe in god / Without god people will do bad things is an Argument from adverse consequences. Just because something is perceived as having good consequences if it is true, does not actually make it true. The fact that religiously free societies with a proportionally large number of atheists are generally
more peaceful than otherwise is evidence this perception is incorrect.
Lots of people believe in a god.
Argumentum ad populum. The popularity of an idea says nothing of its veracity.
Geocentrism,
a flat earth,
creationism,
astrology,
alchemy and
the occult were all once pervasive beliefs. Furthermore, religions are culturally relative and, for the most part, are
inconsistent and mutually exclusive.
God created/caused the universe.
The First Cause Argument, or
Cosmological Argument is
internally contradictory and raises the following questions: Who or what created god?, Why should a hypothetical ācauseā have any of the common attributes of a god?, Why is the ācauseā a specific god?, Why canāt the universe be causeless too? and, most importantly, Why rule out all other
possible explanations? It is fundamentally a
āgod of the gapsā approach. Our current lack of understanding concerning the Universeās origins
does not automatically mean āgodā holds any explanatory value. Metaphysical and theistic speculation
are not immediately justified or correct simply because we lack a comprehensive scientific model. Uncertainty is the most
valid position and one can honestly say āWe just donāt know yetā.
Theists often state āGod is outside of timeā. This claim does not actually make their speculation correct. Instead, it brings with it a whole
host of problems and may be immediately dismissed as being without basis and a type fallacy known as
special pleading.