Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Yes.
Wow.
Not sure what's the best adjective to describe you.......
Ignorant.
Uneducated.
What's the opposite of well read?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.
And the reduction claim is based on burning methane vice coal and oil?Yes.
And the reduction claim is based on burning methane vice coal and oil?
I think it almost funny to see you sticking up for your fellow denier posters. I've just never been that interested in fracking. It produces gobs of cheap methane, pollutes water tables like mad and in some situations can actually cause temblors. I think that's enough to tell where I stand on the process. I'm not in favor of anything that increases the production of fossil fuels. And since methane is an extremely potent GHG and the primary source of the increasing levels of methane in our atmosphere is leakage, increased production and use of it is actually worse than using coal and oil.Wow.
Not sure what's the best adjective to describe you.......
Ignorant.
Uneducated.
What's the opposite of well read?
I think it almost funny to see you sticking up for your fellow denier posters. I've just never been that interested in fracking. It produces gobs of cheap methane, pollutes water tables like mad and in some situations can actually cause temblors. I think that's enough to tell where I stand on the process. I'm not in favor of anything that increases the production of fossil fuels. And since methane is an extremely potent GHG and the primary source of the increasing levels of methane in our atmosphere is leakage, increased production and use of it is actually worse than using coal and oil.
So what was the basic knowledge you think I missed?
But I've said it many times.So what was the basic knowledge you think I missed?
More methane = less coal.
More methane = less CO2.
But I've said it many times.
Expressing a 50-80% renewable and the rest NG.
Including in a thread specifically wanting talk about that Mix and what vas possible.
Few takers.How much of the Mix can Renewables be?
50-80% looks very possible to me. After that, it's very tricky. We have been adding renewables in Vast majority last 5 years: 2/3 (2016) - 85% (2021). How much of the mix is possible/can they ultimately be.. how soon. I posted this pair years ago as part of my series of the most Major issues in...www.usmessageboard.com
abu afak: ""50-80% looks very possible to me.ToddtserParrot: ""Only if we have 50% to 80% Nuclear.""
And
As I said to Flacalteen 8/17/22
A Day Ending in Y So Another Environmental Doomsday Prediction
FERC’s latest monthly “Energy Infrastructure Update” report (with data through June 30, 2021) reveals that renewable energy sources accounted for 91.6% – or 10,940 megawatts (MW) – of the 11,940 MW of new capacity added during the first six months of the year.Wind led the capacity additions with...www.usmessageboard.com
ME"....Some say '100%' is possible.
I Don't see it how but at current Power Gen rates we are and will be making Huge inroads.
I can see the above 60%-80% with NG back up.
(I own NG stocks and mostly NG-MLPs. As we say on Wall Street, 'I only get paid for being right.').."
NG burns cleaner.. except when it doesn't burn/leaks like hell.
And it's 30-80x more powerful as a GHG when it doesn't burn.
We are all still rooting for you to post a paragraph or even break the 15 word Barrier OCD Troll Vag.
`
That's it?Expressing a 50-80% renewable and the rest NG.
How much NG backup capacity will be needed with 50-80% renewable?
That's it?
11 words to my elaborated post.
Your usual Inadequate/Non-conversant POS Troll.
Pathetic Vag licker.
`
Just a small sample of how foolish the propaganda and kool-aid you are drinking.
View attachment 703894
Cost Of The Green Energy Transition: Who You Gonna Believe, Some Research Assistants From Oxford Or Your Lyin' Eyes? — Manhattan Contrarian
Over in Europe, and particularly in those countries in the vanguard of the green energy transition, the enormous costs of this folly have begun to hit home. In the UK, average annual consumer energy bills were scheduled to rise as of October 1 to £3549/year, from only £1138/year just a year ago. (www.manhattancontrarian.com
View attachment 703895
All the calculations for solar include the fact they don't operate at night... OF COURSE!
Wind does blow at night.
Battery tech and the above two sources get better every year.
Solar has gotten 85% more efficient since 2010. It really doesn't need incentives any more except to offset the influence of Big Oil.
That's what has enabled the Green Revolution we are seeing.
Oil, as we see right now, is controlled by the worst possible countries. OPEC+Ru.
Thus a good part of our current inflation.
Solar, wind, battery, will never go to $150 a barrel. On the contrary, they will get more efficient yet. (somewhat like Moore's Law)
`
Solar has gotten 85% more efficient since 2010.
Where did he assert that they weren't costs? And where are the costs for providing power when fossil fuel plants fail?NO! These costs for solar and wind COMPLETELY IGNORE THE FACT that these "supplements" CANNOT PROVIDE consistent power to the grid. THere are MAJOR costs involve in that or even FOOLISHLY attempting to fix that with the Unicorn Fart method of creating a battery ARMAGGEDON of toxic waste and strip-mining the WORLD for the rare components.
WHY do you constantly dishonestly assert that these are NOT COSTS!!!!!
That's complete horseshit. The development curve for solar efficiency PEAKED about 20 years ago. Only the manufacturing volume has brought prices down. WE KNOW how to MAKE solar PV 15% more efficient or more -- but THANKFULLY, even radical know-nothings about tech will AVOID use the Gallium-Arsenide panels that sent on the Mars rovers -- because of the amount toxic Gallium and Arsenic that would need to mined.
That's it?
11 words to my elaborated post showing I do understand the NG issue/back up.
Your usual Inadequate/Non-conversant POS Troll.
Pathetic Vag licker.
Perm Ignore would be justified, but I can't let maybe 10% of your stupid QUIPS by.
But keep posting/last-wording.
I'll just drop by once in a while and I'll leave you some Hemorrhoid creme for the damage I do.
I'm done with you now Vag-ster.
PS: My opponents oft have to post multiple times when they realize they lost/were inadequate.
See it alot.
Especially You, ding, jc456.. the 3 one-line/one-quip trolls.
So basically two points even tho you needed 3 post to make empty claims with No back-up/No linksNO! These costs for solar and wind COMPLETELY IGNORE THE FACT that these "supplements" CANNOT PROVIDE consistent power t.........
That's complete horseshit. The development curve for solar efficiency PEAKED about 20 years ago. Only the manufacturing volume has brought prices down. WE KNOW how to MAKE solar PV 15% more efficient or more -- but THANKFULLY, even radical know-nothings about tech will AVOID use the Gallium-Arsenide panels that sent on the Mars rovers -- because of the amount toxic Gallium and Arsenic that would need to mined.
That was a textbook example of the dunning effect. Congratulations.There don't seem to be a lot of brains inside your skull. Or perhaps English is not your native tongue. I challenge you to show me a published article on the subject that spells the term as you have suggested.
View attachment 704992
You must be confusing me with someone else.Could you just go ahead and tell us, in your opinion, how much fracking reduced US greenhouse gas emissions.
I worked in the industry for 37 years. It’s not spelled fracking. There is no “k” in fracture.You're a trolling Jerk but one would think you have seen enough english words to know..
You haven't seen any? Or you are so used to TROLLING for Trolling sake..
"""When adding ING What is the rule?To keep the /k/ sound intact, a “k” Must be added before the -ing ending.Rule 3: Add a K - - - - - - -
- picnic: There are many people picnicking in the park.
- traffic: A special unit was set up to combat the trafficking of drugs.
- panic: Calm down! Panicking won't help."""
English/Language Arts Help: Add -ING to Verbs by Dropping IE or Adding a K
Learn how to spell the -ing form of verbs correctly. This series details the rules and explains why they exist. We look at dropping -ie, as in die and tie. We also take a look at words like picnic, which require adding a -k before the -ing.www.brighthubeducation.com
`
Then you should have no problem whatsoever showing us some published examples of your spelling.I worked in the industry for 37 years. It’s not spelled fracking. There is no “k” in fracture.
I can’t control others thinking there is a “k” in fracture stimulation. I don’t have that much power.Then you should have no problem whatsoever showing us some published examples of your spelling.
And when I asked Google for the definition of "frac'ing" I got:
Did you mean: definition of fracking
And when I insisted that I meant "frac'ing" it gave me this:
Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
View attachment 705331
Fracking is the injection of a fluid at high pressure into an underground rock formation to open fissures and allow trapped gas or crude oil to flow through a pipe to a wellhead at the surface. This technique is used in natural gas and petroleum production.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/fracking#:~:text=Fracking is the injection of,natural gas and petroleum production.
fracking | Definition, Environmental Concerns, & Facts
https://www.britannica.com/technology/fracking#:~:text=Fracking is the injection of,natural gas and petroleum production.
Which would all seem to indicate that among the many things I'm sure you did for that 37 years in the fracking industry, spelling bees weren't one of them.