Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I let them figure it out themselves
None of my business
Pretti was fighting for his life
He was reaching for the magazines how do they know he didn't have a second weaponThey need to see the gun in his hand or him reaching for a fun. That was not the case
He wasnt able to reach for anything he was face down palms down we call this turtled. Cell phone in right hand and he was blind from the pepper spray. Am agent had his left leg in the air pinning his upper body down. Watch the best analysis of 3 videosHe was reaching for the magazines how do they know he didn't have a second weapon
He didn't stop fighting until the bullets hit him. He could have avoided that by stopping sooner.Yes, Pretti had "stopped" fighting because he was blinded and in pain from multiple application of OC spray to the face and was face down being restrained by 4-5 DHS Agents who were dragging him around and manhandling him as he delt with the pain, blindness, and breathing caused by the spray.
Something was going on. He clearly was not rational.(Is this where you now claim he * * MIGHT ** have hopped up on PCP so the spray had no effect?)
WW
You're making excuses.I think this makes sense, but am wondering what will be said about the fact that the police probably couldn't hear one another because of the whistles and racket.
Nope. The insurtectionist intervened in ICE's lawful actions.ICE was the aggressor not Pretti
5 seconds after being taken away is when there was an accidental discharge of Petti’s firearmThe latest report from the Federal government supports this was an illegal use of deadly force. After He was disarmed there was no imminent threat. 5 seconds after the gun was taken away he was shot by two agents. There were no furtive movements, and he was restrained, violently resisting yes, but unarmed. The agents screwed up.
In context Pretti had a violent encounter a week before breaking his rib, went to the protest/riot with a loaded gun, and was looking to get even. An act of total stupidity. But the use of deadly force was not justified.
![]()
DHS report says 2 agents fired weapons in Alex Pretti shooting
DHS report sent to the House Oversight Committee says two federal agents shot Alex Pretti and does not say that Pretti drew his gun.abcnews.go.com
5 seconds after being taken away is when there was an accidental discharge of Petti’s firearm
Which is what caused federal agents to open fire
And they were justified to do so
One video does show a discharge of Petti’s handgun that the agent was holdingThere is no evidence that Pretti's gun was discharged.
Have you seen a ballistics report? Maybe a crime scene photo of the shell casing? How about bullet damage to the road surface.
Now think through this.
The video's do not show a discharge. The officer (I'll call him Officer Gray for his coat) that recovered the firearm left the scrum with the firearm in his right hand.
Human nature and especially for law enforcement, instinct is going to be to look in the direction of a firearm being discharged to assess the situation and any possible threat.
Now watch the videos, at the time the first shot is fired, Officer Gray looked over his shoulder to his LEFT because that appears to be where the sound comes from. He was holding Pretti's firearm in his right hand, if that gun had accidently discharged he wouldn't have looked left, he would have looked right at the weapon in his hand that had just fired.
The "accidental discharge" theory make no sense. As a matter of fact video analysis shows that the officer in the blank mask behind Pretti that had just watched Officer Gray exit the scrum was the first to fire based on sound, pointing the weapon, and his arm recoiling do to his discharge.
Now if a ballistic report shows the gun was discharge and compares a recovered shell casing against gun markings? Sure, I'll agree there was a discharge of Pretti's firearm.
WW
DHS says no. But they're not providing any evidence so far. On the audio there's definitely one leading gunshot, followed by a bunch of others.One video does show a discharge of Petti’s handgun that the agent was holding
One video does show a discharge of Petti’s handgun that the agent was holding
He intervened to help a woman being abused by ICENope. The insurtectionist intervened in ICE's lawful actions.
DURRRRRR
So, this guy seems perfectly normal and stable to Democrats on here:
Just peacefully protesting and bearing arms as envisioned by the founders?
That's your story and your sticking with it?
No it doesn't.
First video, time hack 09:00
Second video, time hack 22:35
WW
That video was an obvious fakeIn the 2nd video your “expert” says he didnt see pretti’s firearm discharge
But I have seen video where it looked like a discharge to me
When Pretti, aka NumNuts’s gun discharged the other agents opened fire
Do ya’ think?That video was an obvious fake
Pretti made offensive contact during the interaction. That's assault on LE per your provided and quoted directly from your definition.All of that is assault???
Let’s start with the first one. “Getting pushed back off the streets”. How the hell is that considered assault?